Richard Prince's Art, Fair Use or Piracy?

$1.3 Million Krantz/Prince Marlboro Man Photo

Jim Krantz's 1997 photo "Stretchin' Out" taken for a Marlboro ad

Richard Prince's "Art"

In the 1970s Richard Prince became known as a pioneer in "appropriation art" by photographing other photographs, usually from magazine ads, enlarging them and exhibiting them in art galleries. One of his photographs from a Marlboro ad sold by Christie's for $1.3 million, a record for any photograph. The original of this picture as well as another copied by Richard Prince which sold for $332,000 by Christie's, was taken by Richard Krantz on assignment for Marlboro cigarettes ads. Mr. Krantz and others whose photographs Mr. Prince has "borrowed" have expressed concern over this use of their work. Mr. Krantz's advertiser clients in most cases own the copyrights to the photographs copied and sold as art by Mr. Prince. The Guggenheim Museum in New York is currently holding a 30-year retrospective of Mr. Prince's work.

The NY Times article by Randy Kennedy 12-6-07 linked below raises interesting questions about the nature of art, fair use and copyright protection. Apparently the working definition of art in the art auction and museum world includes photographs copied from the work of other photographers.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/06/arts/design/06prin.html?_r=1&ref=arts&oref=slogin


Richard Prince Photo, original or copy?

Lois Greenfield photo (right) and "Red Ribbon" by Jill Pankey (left)
Lois Greenfield photo (right) and "Red Ribbon" by Jill Pankey (left) | Source
Photo of a huge photographic enlargement of John Singer Sargent's "Madam X" which I ran across at Macy's department store recently.
Photo of a huge photographic enlargement of John Singer Sargent's "Madam X" which I ran across at Macy's department store recently. | Source
Madam X by John Singer Sargent
Madam X by John Singer Sargent | Source

Madame X or Portrait of Madame X is the informal title of a portrait painting by John Singer Sargent of a young socialite named Virginie Amélie Avegno Gautreau, wife of Pierre Gautreau. The model was an American expatriate who married a French banker, and became notorious in Parisian high society for her beauty and rumored infidelities. She wore lavender powder and prided herself on her appearance.

Madame X was painted not as a commission, but at the request of Sargent.[1] It is a study in opposition. Sargent shows a woman posing in a black satin dress with jeweled straps, a dress that reveals and hides at the same time. The portrait is characterized by the pale flesh tone of the subject contrasted against a dark colored dress and background.

For Sargent, the scandal resulting from the painting's controversial reception at the Paris Salon of 1884 amounted to the failure of a strategy to build a long-term career as a portrait painter in France.[2]

More by this Author

  • Afghan Girl With Green Eyes
    51

    The photo of the Afghan girl with green eyes by Steve McCurry first appeared on the cover of National Geographic magazine in 1985. Seventeen years later McCurry returned to Afghanistan and succeeded in locating the...

  • Manaus and Amazon Photographs   deedsphotos
    37

    Manaus is located at the confluence of the Amazon and Rio Negro at which point the river is several miles wide. I took my small fixed lens camera and a couple of rolls of Kodak Tri-X film on the boat trip and bus tour....

  • Irving Penn's Extraordinary Portrait Photographs
    32

    At age 90 Irving Penn, the dean of American potrait photographers, continue his work in New York City. As did Richard Avedon, Penn began at Vogue magazine in the 1940s. Penn's portraits span time and subjects unmatched...


Comments 9 comments

William F. Torpey profile image

William F. Torpey 8 years ago from South Valley Stream, N.Y.

This is incredible! I think I'll buy a camera -- actually I have one on my cell phone, but I didn't know how valuable could be.


Earth Angel profile image

Earth Angel 8 years ago

GREAT Hub Paul!! Thank you for sharing!! Beside writing, I create original watercolors and produce my own giclee's!! With just my tiny bit of expertise, and a four-foot wide format HP, I have learned to duplicate my own work so well even trained artists find it hard to tell the difference!! I deal with copyright issues all the time!! Not just for writing but for images as well!! And as you might imagine, I am a huge proponent of honoring the original copyright holder!! GREAT Hub!! Thank you for sharing!!


Ralph Deeds profile image

Ralph Deeds 8 years ago Author

Tnx for the comments!


nikki1 profile image

nikki1 6 years ago

wow, the second photo is a copy. Shame on Marlboros commerical. Can't stand those cancer sticks. They are a silent killer.Great article thou. Sorry for sounding negative at first. Have a great day.


Ralph Deeds profile image

Ralph Deeds 4 years ago Author

Richard Prince lawsuit focuses on limits of appropriation/fair use by artists.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/01/arts/design/rich...


Ralph Deeds profile image

Ralph Deeds 4 years ago Author

1-8-12Richard Prince Art Piracy Case in Appeals Court

Richard Prince piracy case in appeals court CriticalMob

With an appeal scheduled in the next couple of months, Richard Prince's copyright infringement trial ordeal has been one of the most important events to affect the world of art. The crux of the ruling hangs upon whether art appropriation is legal.


Ralph Deeds profile image

Ralph Deeds 3 years ago Author

4-26-13NYTimes--Richard Prince Wins in Fair Use Case

Appeals Court Overturns Case Against Richard Prince - NYTimes.com

In a case with broad implications for the art world, a court decided largely in favor of the appropriation artist, who made use of work by the photographer Patrick Cariou without permission.


Ralph Deeds profile image

Ralph Deeds 2 years ago Author

2-22-14NYTimes "Photographers Band Together to Protect Work in 'Fair Use' Cases" Patricia Cohen

Log In - The New York Times

"To many photographers, a federal appeals court ruling last spring that permitted Prince to use someone else’s photographs in his art was akin to slapping a “Steal This” label on their work. "The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit reasoned that as long as Mr. Prince’s work transformed the images into original art, he was not violating anyone’s copyright.

"But photographers are pushing back against that interpretation. Several membership and trade organizations have banded together recently to press their cause in Congress and the courts..."


yapity 16 months ago

Honestly disgusts me that Richard Prince's work is seen as fair use and original, and yet someone downloading songs and movies on the internet for personal use is a criminal.

Just goes to show you, copyright law is just about whoever has the most money. Richard Prince has money, so he can steal people's images as much as he wants.

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working