EVOLUTION OF PHOTOJOURNALISM

It was a photo which changed the way people looked at the Vietnam War. The sensational photograph of a totally naked little Vietnamese girl scampering for safety, with her skin on fire from napalm shocked readers around the world. Visuals profoundly affect us, but what makes photojournalism so arresting is its capacity to capture the intensity of the action. Henry Luce the founder of LIFE magazine, always insisted that photographs must be taken using “mind-guided cameras”. Obviously newspaper photography is different from say wedding photography or fashion photography. In all other kinds of photography, the accountability of the photographer is to their subjects. But in photojournalism, his accountability is to the public and to ensure that the photo conveys the news as accurately as possible.

Selection of photographs is on the basis of certain criteria, like timeliness, accuracy and objectivity of presentation. There is also a fourth element namely narration, which means the photos, should match the news content.

Growth of photojournalism is closely linked with the development of camera and the mind guiding it. The first great impetus was the introduction of Ermanox cameras in 1924 and the Leica in 1925. The Leica was particularly useful to capture the unfolding action. Realizing the potential of news photos Life, Sports illustrated, and the Daily Mirror began to make extensive use of it.

For the first time, photojournalism helped in conveying not only the sedate political actions around the world but also the more brutal wars fought elsewhere. It was the Crimean war which was first frozen into pictures. But the American Civil war had many chilling moments to show. Alexander Gardner had photographed the execution of the prisoners of civil war. The most interesting was the hanging of Mary Surrat, the first woman in America to be executed. It is a hot day and they show her waiting with other prisoners facing the gallows but with a parasol to shield her from the hot sun. There were others too who had photographed historical moments for posterity. Jimmy Hare documented the Spanish American wars. Horace W. Nicholls the South African War, Luigi Barzini, the Russo-Japanese War and Augustin Victor Casasola the Mexican Revolution. The First World War though well documented was censored, and so we may never know its more poignant moments.

The decades between 1930’s and 50’s is usually called the golden age of photojournalism. Some of the photographs of this period were in fact representative of the era and some even iconic. For example Dorothea Lange’s photograph of a migrant mother beautifully captured the desperation of the masses during the great depression. Closer to our time who can forget the piercing gaze of Shargat Gula, the Afghan girl who stared out of the covers of National Geographic magazine’s June 1984 issue.

By the 1970’s photojournalism was recognized as an art. There were numerous galleries showing exhibitions of the works of photojournalists, and museums having retrospectives. Works of news photographers like Don McCullin were shown in galleries around the world and people’s interest in this genre increased rapidly. With the advent of digital photography and citizen journalism, I believe that the golden age of photojournalism is yet to come

More by this Author

  • EVOLUTION OF INDIAN HINDU TEMPLE ARCHITECTURE
    16

    EVOLUTION OF INDIAN TEMPLE ARCHITECTURE Indian temples have been a source of attraction, not only as a place of worship for the devout, but also as an architectural marvel for the curious tourist. Indian temples with...

  • A BRIEF HISTORY OF INDIAN ART
    3

    A Brief History of Indian Art Indian art is a blend of the sensuous and spiritual and has its origin nearly five thousand years ago during the heyday of Indus Valley civilization. Often referred as the...

  • HINDU TEMPLES
    2

    Hindu temples were built not only with the intention of it being the nucleus of religious life, but also social activity. In south India most of the temples were built on a grand scale. The BRIHADEESHWARA temple in...


Comments 5 comments

Tolovaj profile image

Tolovaj 2 years ago

Interesting presentation of photojournalism and intriguing comments too. Looking at photojournalism as an art probably seems strange to some readers and I like your explanation with sense of aesthetics. I would also like to add aesthetics is not the only criteria.

In my opinion the most important part of art is ability to transfer feelings, emotions, cause reaction ... If we look at these factors, it is art without a doubt.


ram_m profile image

ram_m 4 years ago from India Author

Photography can an be art, but photojournalism has its limitation. A good photojournalistic cannot improvise or manipulate. But a good photojournalist must must have aesthetic sense to freeze the action taking place. As this comes only by good timing and practice,photojouralism is an art.


Plasmagician 4 years ago

Do you consider the photojournalist to be an artist? If so at what point do you think photojournalism evolved into fine art?


ram_m profile image

ram_m 4 years ago from India Author

Since every photograph is as seen by the eye and interpreted by the brain, I think every photograph has the potential to be senstional.However it truly becomes sesational only when when it is edited and given a particular slant,this I think is the dividing line between objectivity and bias.


ejemarines profile image

ejemarines 4 years ago from Northern California

Do you think sensationalism plays a big role in photojournalism?

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working