Now that I have a camera with a half decent resolution I am considering making some of my pics available for microstock sites, I am attracted to the idea of another residual income, even if that income is modest.
I would be interested in hearing whether or not anybody else has used microstock sites for this purpose, and whether they have had success doing so; what level of earnings should I expect per year per 1000 decent quality photos?
If $1500 a year is realistic with a portfolio that extensive then I will give it a go; I'm not patient enough (and probably not quite skilled enough) to pursue macrostock sales, and I have read numerous accounts of people making substantially more through microstock anyway.
And what does better, raw photos or enhanced images? I am half capable on photoshop, but editing to such a degree takes time and is therefore likely an unviable in an environment which I should imagine is a numbers game just like Hubpages?
Any insight into your experiences, or alternative site suggestions, is most appreciated.
I started to do this a couple years ago but found that it was just as time consuming, if not more, than article writing.
I was interested because my neighbor was earning nearly $600 a month from an 800+ image portfolio across several sites.
If I were going to start now, I would create a blog and make a post with every image I wanted to upload to microstock sites with all the proper tags and possible uses for the images along with a shrink wrapping or watermark to protect them from thieves. And I would link the image to the microstock service that is hosting it. But make sure the blog is in proper format with categories, tags, permalinks, etc.
Raw images are preferred to enhanced images because the buyer will most likely want to do the enhancing. Some sites want and need vector images as well.
Here is a list of sites that I am registered with but never uploaded anything. (most of them have great photography tutorials and tips which I have found beneficial)
I am with shutterstock, but the same images the have been accepted by shutterstock have not been accepted by Istock. I have made $4.00 so far with only 8 images, but could use some advise. Should I just try to get my photos on all of the ones you posted?
Hi richard.." And I would link the image to the microstock service that is hosting it". How can you link images to microstock service?
I registered with http:/submit.shutterstock.com/ 1week ago.. they ask for 10 photos initially. So i was preparing 10 photos to submit.. But i have no idea as how does shutter stock pay for every photo. Any idea?
Unless you are a highly skilled and productive photographer, it may not be realistic to expect $1500 from SS in the first year. Don't forget, the micro stock market is highly saturated with many professionals.
I have realised that the standards are too high, I have found a few sites which take editorial pictures; they require no manipulation.
As much as I would love to mess around on photoshop all day I just don't have the time.
I have had 30 images accepted by an editorial stock site, so that's the direction that I will head in.
I had bad luck with shutterstock they pay less than all sites i researched, better off flippn burgers
There's another new stock site 123stock.co.uk, probably worth adding on there before it gets over crowded like the main ones
Hi Ryan I've been doing stock footage almost full-time for 2 years. I average about $1000US a month. It took a lot of time and work.
Online collection as of April 2016
Pond 5 5300, Shutterstock 4059, Videoblock 2401, Dissolve 3673, Pixta 154, Motion elements 5723
Online collection as of April 2015
Pond 5 est 3000, Shutterstock 3000, Videoblock 1000, Dissolve 2432, Pixta 1258
You may have shot a lot of footage, what what really counts is how many clips you have approved an on-line with the stock footage agencies. Here is a snapshot of my current collection. I started out with 500 clips that I submitted to Motionelements and have steadily increased my collection since January 2014.
I've just release a Free report for info for the past 2 years. More info Here
Getting 1000 photos loaded, keyworded, model/property released, and accepted by quality control would be an enormous task. If you do manage that your earnings goal is realistic if your pictures are of a diverse range of human models in commercial poses, of they are objects and landscapes, not so much.
The quality control is very strict these days both in terms of focus and technicals, and copyright on designed objects and model releases. I found it just too much hard work to get things loaded, although they were the best eaner of the sites I used.
Can't help you Ryan - it's a site I came across ages ago and looked over. Not that I was interested - I'm no photographer. I remember reading that they're picky about what they'll take. I suppose they want 'creative' over 'obvious'.
Hopefully someone will appear sooner or later and have something better for you.
Edit - I think they prefer raw images, so the users can Photoshop them etc to their own liking. The cleaner the better.
I would like to hear folks experiences too, not that I have a fancy camera but I do go on holidays, and I do have a camera (point and shoot, but I love her).
You can make money on Shutter stock,
but you need:
1. Several hundred images for submission,
2. They need to be 100% technically sound,
3. Be within their pixels resolutions needs,
4. Must be of "in demand subjects".
I take pictures of Disney, Universal Studios and SeaWorld down here in Orlando. Seems like those would be in demand, no?
Interesting. I didn't realise there was any cash in it / almost a scam. I do like the idea of properly SEO indexing them and driving some traffic though. thanks tp livewithrichard for the list of sites.
I have been with ShutterStock for a little over a year. I make money on a regular basis. But it is not easy. There is a big difference between taking photos and taking photos that will promote or sell a product. They are not looking for snapshots. Photos of flowers and sunsets are out unless you have something that is exceptional. Any people in the photos must provide a model release, and this is even if you can't see their face. Many buildings and public structures require a property release. No photos of cars, motorcycles, busses, trucks, etc. without a property release from the manufacturer. I could go on but I think you get my drift. Money can be made but it takes as much time and effort as writing, and I find the returns from writing to be more substantial.
Hope this helps.
I am not with Shutterstock, but I do work with iStockphoto and have made some money there. I don't know how demanding Shutterstock is, but iStockphoto is very and anything I submit has to go through an inspection which takes up to 10 days for approval. It's very time consuming, and I find it does take more time then writing articles, but there are many photographers doing this full-time. I think in order to be successful you must shoot commercial product and lifestyle shots, and you have to have an online portfolio of at least 500 photos to make a decent second income. I am not there yet....maybe one day. *sigh*
I am registered with Bigstockphoto, Fotolia,Dreamstime, 123RF and Stockphotomedia. The standards are very high and there is loads of competition so don't expect to make too much money. It is worth a go though - afterall the images would only be sitting on your hard drive with no earnings potential right?
Ryankett - I would be interested in the editorial sites you use. Any chance you can do a bit of name dropping? Cheers.
You can certainly make some money using stock photo sites. But the amount will depend on your effort. I have been with Istockphoto for four years and haven't made hardly anything, but I also don't put a lot of effort into it. To make money in stock photography you need a large database of images and you need to contribute photos regularly. The search engines on the major stock sites favor images with a lot of downloads and images that are newer.
Google Yuri Arcurs if you want to see what is possible in the stock photo world. He makes huge sums of money, but most of it is invested right back into his photography.
I have tried some of these stock photo sites with limited success. You need to have pictures that are of content that applies to stock photography and the pictures need to be near perfection. Since most of my photography is of nature my pictures aren't what stock photography is looking for. I still take pictures with the intent of adding to stock photography sites and find the feedback useful I have not invested the time that I can plan on making any real money at.
Great. Thanks this is good information. Indeed what I'm hearing is - as one person pointed out - it takes a lot of work - and is a "challenging" as article writing (online); so the choice is to make it work...if one decides to work at it. thanks. peace.
Yeah remember you get what you pay for an oversaturated greedy market like shutterstock will leave you very unhappy, better luck at fotolia or rtf
I've signed up for Shutterstock, iStock, Deposit photos, Fotolia and Dreamstime. Its been about 10 days since I joined and only earned 25c. I've posted over 100 images and only 42 accepted for sale on Shutterstock.
Also posted about 17 on Fotolia and but they accepted 14 images. Every site has its differences. Although the photos I've uploaded are very old and are not shot for stock photography. Simply trying to upload as much as I can from my hard drive since they're just sitting there. I will be shooting for the purpose of stock photography as soon as all the hard drive images are uploaded (at least the decent ones)
Even though 25c is barely anything, its a lot of fun when people actually buy your image and obviously appreciate what you've done. Seeing the rejections and what is accepted into the stock agencies are also a great learning curve to photography no matter what level you're at.
Url Minimum size notes Minimum payout
Alamy 17MB 100% Rejection
Bigstock doesn't say 100% Rejection
CanStock 3 - 20 5 uploads/day $50
Dreamstime 3 - ? $100
Fotoila 4 - 30 100% Rejection $50
RedBubble doesn't say auto Acceptance no minimum got 18 CENTS (who-hoo - NOT!)
Only RedBubble allows me to put on a gallery of all my works, all others, I have no gallery although I have been accepted by CanStock and Dreamstime, there ain't ZERO chance of getting money outta it. Check out my gallery @ http://www.redbubble.com/people/ptosis/portfolio
Besides Shutterstock requires you to pay them to put your stuff online. That's why I don't use shutterstock.
I have a question: HP Pavillion g6 "This device does not have a profile for whole screen color correction" sRGB.icc uncalibrated. Is this the reason it looks good in RawTherapee but too light in email or imaged viewer? Would buying a monitor calibrator fix this problem? Same image looks different depending on program. What should I aim for?
Shutterstock does not require any payments. Not sure where that idea came from. I have paid them zero, they have paid me just over $700 to date, mind you that is since 2006 (300 images in portfolio)
by seamus8 years ago
I'm curious where you all go to get photos. I used istockphoto.com sometimes and that can get pricey if there's nothing suitable in the half-price bin.For some subjects, I could use my own. For others, it's best to get...
by MargaritaB5 years ago
Can anyone advise the least expensive place to get photos or graphics with whitespace behind them. I know I can get free photos from dreamstime but I am looking at the more business oriented ones that you see on...
by cre8ivOne3 years ago
Can anyone point me to the page about acceptable photo websites? I have lost track of this page and my options. Thanks much!
by LindaSmith12 years ago
I understand Creative Commons and so forth. The question is about the Free photos that are allowed for commercial use, but they have ISTOCK across the image? ISTOCK is one of several places for free images...
by Glen4 years ago
Post them in here. Please don't post them in other threads, or start multiple threads for individual hubs, as it will quickly fill up the sub-forum and make it harder for people to offer advice when help is being...
by Eric Dockett11 months ago
In the blog post about moving away from subdomains Paul referenced comparing HubPages to competitors several times. To me, this indicates HP has identified certain sites as typical of the kind of site HP is attempting...
Copyright © 2016 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.