Corvair Corsa or Monza: Nearly Identical Classic Cars

 There is a mystery or oddity about the Corvair Corsa and Monza built between 1965-1966. Some may not think it is odd or mysterious, yet logically, why did Chevrolet produce two cars that are nearly identical for the public?

Some feel it simply was a continuation of the Corvair line as was done earlier with the Monza and Spyder from 1962-64. Was Chevrolet trying to revamp the underpowered Monza for a more muscele car crowd? After all, the Mustand and Barracuda were the first of many in 1965. What was the motive? Did they actually think that Corsa sales would go through the roof, as it was the most expensive of all the Corvairs. Did they think that the public would not notice how similar they are?

The Monza and Corsa share identical bodies except to emblems and their placement. If you remove them, one cannot tell which is which from the outside. When you look at the interior, a Monza will have three large gauges on the dash. The Corsa will have several small and large gauges for a more sporty and racy look. The rest of the dash, except for the emblem is identical. The rest of the interior in either car is nearly identical also.

Engine wise, the Monza or the cheapest model, the 500, usually had a standard 95 or 110 hp motor, identified by two carburetors. The Corsa had the 140 or 180 hp motor with four carburetors or turbo. It was the engine that was its distinguishing feature.

Chevrolet tried to appeal to all parties, which made things confusing. You could buy the cheapest Corvair, the 500, with a 140 hp motor. You could buy the Monza with it also or the turbo. Of course, with neither car could you get the "racy" dash or the rear cove area painted that gray silver, which was another cosmetic distinguishing feature of the Corsa. That was Corsa exclusive!

So other than the dash and motor, Chevy tried unsuccessfully to sell both the Corsa and Monza body styles to the same sport audience in 1965 and 1966. What happened was that the Monza and its options outsold the Corsa line by three to one. The public was not willing to spend another $500-1000 for a car that was not that different. Some thought that even the engine of the Corsa, with only 30 more Hp than the Monza, was insignificant enough to warrant the added expense.Because both were identical in body, there was confusion in the mind of the public, which asked "why"? Some thought, Chevy tried to make the Corvair a muscle car, yet it was still underpowered when compared to a Ford Mustang 289 hp for around the same price.

After 1966, Chevy discontinued the Corsa model as sales did warrant it. They returned to the Monza line until 1969, with the option of having a 140 hp motor in the car. Today, a Corsa is worth twice as much as a Monza in the same condition, maybe more to those who collect them. A totally restored Corsa coupe can fetch between $5-8,000, a Monza, usually around $3000-4000.

Comments 10 comments

Rich  6 years ago

Note; you could not buy or order a Monza with the 180hp turbo - this was a CORSA exclusive option only.


perrya profile image

perrya 6 years ago Author

You are correct. Thanks.


Jason Stubblefield 6 years ago

The Corsa, as the top sport model also came with heavy duty springs, with a lowered ride height, quick steering arms (to decrease the number of turns full lock to full lock). The Corsa is also distinguishable from the exterior by two chrome grill inserts beneath the rear bumper. The Monza had a simple rolled pan. The corsa dash was functional as well with gauges for oil temp, head temp, boost (on turbo models), and a tach, offering those with performance driving in mind the opportunity to watch critical information.


perrya profile image

perrya 6 years ago Author

All true, still, but for the nuances, they are almost identical. Corsa had dual exhausts and sounds like a Harley cycle.


Jason Stubblefield 6 years ago

I forgot something in my last post, sorry. The corsas also came with a short throw shifter and bucket seats as standard.


Jason Stubblefield 6 years ago

Chevy never tried to make the Corvair a muscle car, or market it as such. It was a sporty subcompact. Even then the turbo Corsa would walk a mustang at highway speed, and leave one in the dust in a series of corners. All 140 horse cars had dual exhaust, and the turbo cars had a single exhaust exiting through the pan on the rt side, ALL other engines exhausts exited below the pan. That's one surefire way to tell a factory turbo car. I've ridden a few harleys, and owned a few corvairs, and the sound I'd most liken a corvair exhaust to is an airplane, not a poorly engineered 2 cyl motorcycle. No-one bitches that an si civic is nearly a civic. I guess that's because hondas are popular and Corvairs aren't. Go Sheep!


John 5 years ago

sorry dude, the turbo was a Corsa only option also...They were very popular with sales approaching two million. All pony cars should pay homage to their reason for existing, the Corvair. A late model Corvair draws a crowd everywhere with its sophisticated and timeless looks. Go look at a similar year Mustang....dated, isn't it?


perrya profile image

perrya 5 years ago Author

I know, I have 67 Monza. The turbo models did not sell well and are the rarest of any corvair, assuming they are running. yes, corvairs from 1960-69, sold nearly 2 million cars. The Corsa and Monza are identical in many ways, i know, I had a corsa.


bill 5 years ago

My 65 140 Corsa, could beat 289 Mustangs in a drag, and out run Vettes in a road race.


perrya profile image

perrya 5 years ago Author

But only in a short distance, in the long run, Corsa will lose.

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    More by this Author


    Click to Rate This Article
    working