A Simple Definition of Laissez-Faire Economics

John Baptiste-Colbert (8.29.1619 - 9.6.1683)
John Baptiste-Colbert (8.29.1619 - 9.6.1683) | Source

Jean Baptiste Colbert

Jean Baptiste Colbert was a French statesman who has been given credit for creating an economic system in France. He descended from a family of businessmen and became a successful minister under King Louis XIV. Colbert acquired a lot of responsibility involving finances and managed affairs for the royal household. He also managed the merchant marine and the navy.

Colbert's aim was to build France's economy. Although he wasn't successful in his attempt to create royal trading companies that could compete with other countries, he made up for this in his achievement with the merchant marine and navy. He basically laid the foundation for what would be accomplished in the future.

Colbert believed that if he could effect the Dutch in how they dominated trade, that possibly France could take over that role. So when King Louis XIV invaded Holland for no justifiable reason, Colbert would support this cause. The war lasted for seven years and it affected the economy in France in the long run. This would be the last time that a minister would wear as many hats as Colbert.

Mercantilism

The term, mercantilism, stems from an economic system utilized by countries involved with trade from the 16th through the 18th centuries. These countries would export goods in exchange for precious metals, especially gold. Because gold was in such high demand, these mercantilist countries understanding wealth knew they could use the gold to acquire other types of merchandise. On products that were imported, a duty was imposed on same which would raise money for the government, which had a lot of control over the economy. Colbert was an advocate of mercantilism, the policies of which would slowly end with the birth of the industrial revolution and laissez-faire.

Essentially, mercantilism was built around the idea that countries participating with this type of commercial policy would gain power and wealth. However, under this type of policy, commerce was very much regulated by the government and as indicated above, the goal was to obtain a lot of gold and create monopolies in the trade market.

Laissez-faire

This subject may seem as dry as melba toast, but once familiarized with what it is and some of the history behind this notion, it becomes interesting. Additionally, if you do not know what it is, then you will have learned something new and the next time you hear the phrase in a conversation, you will understand what's being said.

The translation of French word, "laissez," into English means "let." The translation of "faire" from French to English is "do." The concept is that people in their business dealings should be allowed to do as they wish without any interference from others. This philosophy was born as early as the 17th Century.

The philosophy of laissez-faire grew out of France during the 18th century due to unfair economic practices of business. The concept of laissez-faire carries with it a freedom to operate a business that is not interfered with by the government and if so, at a minimum.

Without any operating restraints, the notion is that a well-adjusted operation would grow out of steady production and trade, which would benefit both the merchant and the buyer (or in the 18th century, a type of barter agreement).

By the time of the 19th century, laissez-faire became popular in the Western world; however, this philosophy would become interrupted by the behavior of commerce. When employees were treated poorly and with the lack of consideration for consumers, as just two examples, people began to re-evaluate laissez-faire. As countries became more industrialized, it was desired for the government to become involved to help protect employees as well as the consumers. Laws were created to protect people.

In the 20th century, laissez-faire would return some 40 years ago during the 1970s with the modernized term of "free enterprise." Odds are if you live in a laissez-faire country, then you live in a capitalistic society.

François Quesnay (6.4.1694 - 12.16.1774)
Fran├žois Quesnay (6.4.1694 - 12.16.1774) | Source

Francois Quesnay

Economists used to be referred to as "Physiocrats." Steering the boat for the Physiocrats was Francois Quesnay. The Physiocrats and others were under the reign of King Louis XV (ruler from 1715-1774). Because the Physiocrats believed that their economy's strength came from agriculture. As such, they wanted the the government to lower taxes on agriculture in order to achieve success and become a richer country as England. Allegedly, at that time was when Quesnay had created the term, laissez-faire. He firmly believed that economic growth in France would be a result of agriculture, and not from anything that was industrial. It would be Quesnay who would help to shape the subject of economics. Quesnay also believed that the reason why conditions were poorly in France was due to the policies of mercantilism and Colbert.

The government in France had so much power over the behavior of its manufacturers that they were not able to easily compete with other countries. As such, farmers had to pay a higher price for any type of machinery and the wealthy were enable to heavily tax the farmers to exhaustion. Quesnay believed the government regulations needed to be reformed and that taxes needed to be lowered. He also believed that traders should be able to freely trade.

Victor Riqueti-Marquis de Mirabeau (10.5.1715 - 7.13.1789)
Victor Riqueti-Marquis de Mirabeau (10.5.1715 - 7.13.1789)

Victor Riqueti-Marquis de Mirabeau

Victor Riqueti-Marquis de Mirabeau was a French political economist who was influential and involved with the Physiocratic economic philosophies. After serving in two wars, he studied political economy (doesn't that make you wish you took Economics in college?). Mirabeau wrote papers on his notions and was critical of the government's intervention and control. He also believed that wealth could be derived more so from agriculture than trade. He supported the ideas of the Physiocrats and believed that that tax system in France was archaic. Despite criticism, he was committed to his beliefs in what would benefit France economically.

Thanks for reading!

More by this Author


Comments 7 comments

ytsenoh profile image

ytsenoh 3 years ago from Louisiana, Idaho, Kauai, Nebraska, South Dakota, Missouri Author

Uh, no, bless you! Thanks for the read and terrific comment. Certainly laissez faire has evolved. I like your biological metaphor.


stuff4kids profile image

stuff4kids 3 years ago

Okay, that was interesting but I don't have a degree in economics. I can see (I think) the reasoning behind this system and the many ways in which it might be said to work.

However, things have changed a lot in the last several hundred years, not least of which changes is the impact of anthropogenic carbon emissions on the global environment. Could that be seen as part of the consequence of unbridled capitalism?

You see, we now know just how complex the web of life is and we should also realize that no one segment of the system can have all the knowledge necessary about the whole system in order to make properly informed decisions.

So 'laissez faire' now means leaving people to act unrestrained, through selfish motivations in a state of ignorance of the wider consequences of their actions. Unless, there is a unified system of knowledge-sharing and organization, based on science and mediated by a central State.

If you take a biological metaphor, the cells in the body must be controlled by the brain. Uncontrolled growth (the economics of capitalism) is the philosophy of the cancer cell, isn't it?

Maybe. Just some thoughts!

Bless you :)


SilentReed profile image

SilentReed 3 years ago from Philippines

Mercantilism and Imperialism went hand in hand during the periods you mention. The European countries ( the U.S. was a later participant) exploited their colonies in Asia, Africa, Latin America, (the middle east when oil was discovered) of their natural resources.Trading posts where establish by colonies of settlers. Ships brought raw materials back to their countries, and finish products on their return voyage to the colonies. Governments were heavily involved. They provided the forces for conquest and the security of colonizing settlers. The traders and merchants grew rich while government coffers filled up with the tariffs and levies imposed. This was a purely mercenary undertaking with no concern for the welfare of the native inhabitants.

" Free enterprise" supposedly means allowing market forces (demand and supply) to dictate the flow of resources and determine the price of goods. But we have seen the result of giving Carte Blanche without stringent monitoring to big Capital. The laissez-faire attitude of see no evil, hear no evil of government towards big business have only encourage them to manipulate market forces to line their own pockets, while millions lose their jobs and lifetime savings. Is there any difference between the Mercantilism of the 16th-18th century and Capitalism as practice today by global corporations? They both exploit people.


ytsenoh profile image

ytsenoh 3 years ago from Louisiana, Idaho, Kauai, Nebraska, South Dakota, Missouri Author

Billy, thank you. A degree in Economics? Good grief, kudos to you. I continue to learn away, learn away. Thank you for the read, and the compliment. Lots of fun researching it and translating it into something understandable.


billybuc profile image

billybuc 3 years ago from Olympia, WA

Thanks for taking me back to my college days. With a degree in Economics I definitely understood everything that you wrote about. Great explanation of a complicated subject.


ytsenoh profile image

ytsenoh 3 years ago from Louisiana, Idaho, Kauai, Nebraska, South Dakota, Missouri Author

Lily, thank you so much for the visit and your comment. Hope all is well! Have a really good weekend.


lilyfly profile image

lilyfly 3 years ago from Wasilla, Alaska

I love the fact that, the French are so like us, in defeating an enemy of equality, namely, the aristocracy, but I'm horrified about how cowed we've become against Wall Street, we can't take much more of our brand of economy. The worker is already on their knees. Thank you for an insightful read Ynetsoh!

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working