Job listings say the unemployed need not apply
By Liz Goodwin
National Affairs Reporter
Hundreds of job opening listings posted on Monster.com and other jobs sites explicitly state that people who are unemployed would be less attractive applicants, with some telling the long-term unemployed to not even bother with applying.
The New York Times' Catherine Rampell said she found preferences for the already employed or only recently laid off in listings for "hotel concierges, restaurant managers, teachers, I.T. specialists, business analysts, sales directors, account executives, orthopedics device salesmen, auditors and air-conditioning technicians." Even the massive University of Phoenix stated that preference, but removed the listings when the Times started asking questions.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/job … 43362.html
this is a form of discrimination and the corporations are weeding out older workers..its a lot like those who don't need money are offered loans mortgages and credit cards
This is a true story -- yesterday I saw an advertisement for a 25 hour per week part-time Administrative Assistant position here in my town, and it said "People with Full Time employment Need Not Apply". So I guess they are trying to help people who are unemployed?
Unfortunately employers do not want people with gaps in their employment history. However, it is not impossible to get a job without much employment history. You just have to work a little harder to get the job.
I heard about this on the radio the other day. Can employers do that?
I have been unemployed since April. Think i'm going to add freelance writer as my current job on my resume.
I have always heard that it is easier to finD a job when you already had one.
This is nothing new. Even before the recession, most employers only looked to the employed to fill their positions. Being long-term unemployed will make it almost impossible to ever work again.
I heard not long ago that "word" among those in hiring positions is that "if a person hasn't worked for a year it's because he doesn't want to work". That's complete and utter cluelessness about how looking for/wanting work really works; but that's apparently neither hear nor there in that particular field.
I am fairly positive that it is illegal to include that in the actual job posting. It is a same this happens. I am sure that employed candidates are preferred because employers believe they are "more valuable," but I think it is terrible. If the world's economy is to succeed, those that are unemployed should be considered first for jobs.
if you've been unemployed for a long time, that, probably, means that you've already lost some of your skills! Employer can pick and choose anybody, but should not openly reject people. It's digusting, indeed. Morally very degrading. Feels like a dead end.
by Grace Marguerite Williams4 years ago
IF YOU HAVE BEEN UNEMPLOYED FOR A LONG TIME, YOU ARE VIRTUALLY DAMNED, WELL IN THE EYES OF SOME EMPLOYERS! If you are unemployed for a long period of time, BEWARE! According to employment ads, many employers...
by Jim Hunter6 years ago
Thats ridiculous, if you can't find a job in your area in three years then move to where the jobs are. Unemployment is beginning to be a career for some people.
by Holle Abee6 years ago
I was hoping with the Christmas season, the jobless rate would improve. More than 28,000 retail jobs were lost in November, but according to the article, some people who might have been hired late in the month might not...
by kirstenblog6 years ago
Or would you accept a job where you are being asked to cover two positions, one of which is an hour away in decent weather (this is on foot, no car and I don't drive anyway) that will result in there being situations...
by Frankied6 years ago
I am 58 and 'retired'. A series of unexpected expenses has caused me to find a full or part time job. I have looked everywhere but to no avail. I am able and willing to work for a lot, lot less money...
by ledefensetech7 years ago
Can you believe it? The government may have actually underreported the real number of unemployed and underemployed.FYI, that last part is bunk. The real reason the "official" numbers are lower is...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.