Some of us don't have all day to visit all the places we share our work on. I, personally do not have that many tabs that I can open up to share my work on. Please add it back. I was told that when it was up some people used it as spam. Can you explain to me and others here how it was used as spam and why HP Staff cannot fo get just those who are misusing the system?
Lady Guinevere, thanks for the suggestion. We took the Sharing box down for two reasons:
1. It was very little used. The people who are active participants in the Communities that were featured there have other methods (tools from those sites, copy/paste, etc.) to share Hubs with those Communities.
2. What use there was of the feature was often abuse. Using it to share your own Hubs in Communities where you are not an active participant is overly self-promoting, and that is not a practice that we endorse.
In the new Hub design we were trying to make the page simpler and easier for readers to engage. To clutter it with features that were not very often used (and prone to abuse) made it more likely that users would click on nothing.
I liked that feature too, Lady Guinevere. The share button was a convenience to those of us who do use it properly. It seems a shame to be penalized for those who don't. That and the bookmark feature that is no longer available. And the print feature. I often would print out hubs and take them to people (like my Mom) to read off line.
A lot of the things about the HubPages site that made it great are changing and being dropped. And strangely enough it coincides with the drop in traffic.
I agree Peg.
Why is Hubpages catering to those who do not use the feature respectably? Why are they not going after those who do not use it wisely instead of doing other things. That just doesn't make any sense. Show me where it was "very little used" versus those who misused it? I want numbers not guesses.
Do any of you in Management ever ask what features we want or don't want? Do any of us even matter to you?
You can still print. We made a style sheet in the html of the page that when you use Print from any web browser, it prints the page the same as the the Print button did. And, since the vast majority of web users use the print function of their browsers, it's one less item that was needed in the page.
Thanks so much for your response, really. It makes things a little more understandable when a "real" person answers an inquiry. Yes, I figured out how to print by using print preview then reducing the size until I get the number of pages I can live with. My point was that change is difficult and there are so many changes that are happening all at once to us here. So many of the features we liked seeing and grew comfortable with using...I will just have to get over it and move along now.
The options I miss the most in the "share" feature is the url with the tracker already inserted.
There was another option which provided a short url, this was good for sharing with limited characters, Twitter! If you use tinyurl, everyone thinks it is spam or infected.
Your URL is no longer counted as character on your Tweets, because Twitter automatically shorts the URL if it's too long and inserts it's own version of the URL.
Notice: t.co on your hubs or traffic sources. These are from Twitter.
There's still a Twitter share button the Hub.
Then travel to the bottom of the page and click on "link to this page" and you'll still be able to.
I do not see it, though I may be missing it. I just noticed an extra Adsense block at the bottom.
I did find the short url, thanks.
You still have to open pages to all the other social site you belong to and post it on them. As with the box it would automatically log you onto that site. A lot less clicks and tabs and windows to open. Some of us are not computer wizzes, not talking about me of course, but others out there.
The comment that it was easy to spam, that doesn't make any sense because they can still spam all over the place if they aren't active on those sites.
Hey Lady G,
The point she was making is that it's not harder to do the SPAM on other sites.
So why penalize the rest of us for doing what is so easily done by everyone else?
It should be fairly easy to access those sites individually if you use them on a regular basis. The point is you should only post your links on sites where you are active anyway as a community member. Otherwise it's justs spamming.
So that still does not make sense for us who do use it properly to get penalized for those who do not. It is up to those "other site" to do the correcting on their own site, not for HP to do so. HP should take care of HP, not be Mom and Dad over other sites.
I have what Haunty calls spam only until I learn how to use the site and get to know others and the software. I don't misuse it though.
Look, there are many who want this feature back and that is all the WE are asking.
Hey Lady G, sorry for the typo. Apparently it made my sentence's context out of whack.
Substitute- now for not. Not=now.
The option for the short URL is still available under HubMetrics
by Glenn Stok4 years ago
I think it would be useful to have a column added to the statistics page that shows the total number of shares for each hub (Tweets and Facebook likes). There is not enough room to add two columns. So this could be a...
by Mary Hyatt4 years ago
My feed is full of "shares" by a Hubber. HP recommends we do not share our own Hubs too frequently, why can't that apply to multiple sharings by the same Hubber for other Hubs. I don't think they...
by jellygator2 years ago
I've been disenchanted with some things here lately, particularly since my traffic went from over a thousand hits a day to about 1/3 of that. Today, I did more than just check in on my stats and actually checked out a...
by Don Bobbitt6 months ago
I don't get into these fights and disagreements with what HP does on a regular basis. But I looked at my Hubs and I only saw the four sites; Flipboard, Pinterest, Facebook and email in my share icons over the past week...
by Thallia Roberts4 years ago
While entering "pant..." I got an interesting hub title suggestion:"Smart Ass Thong Panties for Moms Product Review"Sure is an interesting topic! I suppose it would be fun to write about, but...
by Marcy Goodfleisch5 months ago
Hi, HP Team! I don't know if this has been suggested before or not, but can our fantastic IT team develop a way to automate the HP copyright language you've created for us? I have more than 100 pieces published here,...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.