More than 'likely' paradigmsearch will say that is the null set before raising it to the power of 2 or nothing = nothing. Yet with analytical geometry many times that formula is viewed as the sine or cosine raised to the power of 2 whereby the answer is 1. I think i was still in there before that prescribed time allotment.

Then again, we may presume infinity before raising by the power or 2 and we discover infinity.

Another presumption could be the theory of reciprocity and existence. A discussion can be found here at Theory of Reciprocity A Metaphysical Thesis by Jack McNally tying into the null set being raised to the power of 2. Then the discovery of 'nothing' occurs along with time, space, and the finite. The oddity is seeking entropy which can be compared/contrasted to death is the 'need' of a finite definition. In other words you can define the distance between two point up to the point, then you have to define the point. That leads to black holes and stuff like string theory, M-theory and on and on. The question many argue today is not the that infinity exists, yet more so what is existence in infinity and vice versa. Some say you cannot define the point. since the point cannot be found.

I like this definition best most of the time. It definitely defines the line. It defines the beginning. It defines the finish line too. The Choice