jump to last post 1-4 of 4 discussions (24 posts)

Which other sites should I write at?

  1. CyclingFitness profile image92
    CyclingFitnessposted 3 years ago

    Having spent 18months on hp with some success I'm starting to see the logic in diversifying to other sites

    Where do others recommend? I've had a look at squidoo and find the sports content to be far weaker than hubpages. Any other suggestions for where to write sports and health+ fitness content?

    1. Greekgeek profile image96
      Greekgeekposted 3 years ago in reply to this

      squidoo tip: If the content in one particular category isn't that great, that means your good content has a chance of climbing to the top and owning that category. This isn't an enormous advantage, but it is an advantage, since people browsing the categories will see (and rate?) lots of your lenses, search engines will see links to them from the category pages which may help them rank better, and it's possible your pages will appear more often in the "show related" box of the other pages in the category.

      The bottom line for that site is: can you create content that people are looking for, and can you make it interactive, with links to interesting related resources, products, or sports pages that readers are loiable to click on? Big payouts on that site come through reader engagement and clickouts. (Or, alternatively, treat Squidoo's in-house payouts as a nice bonus, and make the bulk of your income through affiliate links like Amazon and Zazzle so that you keep 100% of sales commissions. A lot of Squidoo members make more money that way, although I don't.)

      Different people have more earnings luck on different sites, but while I publish on four sites plus two blogs and have made a big push to diversify this year, Squidoo provides 80% of my not-quite-minimum wage. wink Surprisingly, since the September HP crash, my second-best earner is YouTube videos: I'd created a few educational videos and video product reviews to embed on my lenses, and forgot I'd monetized them, but now they're starting to pull a dollar or so of income a day.

      Which just means there may be a lot of earning options if you think outside the box. For me, there's three criteria I look for when pondering places to diversify:
      -- Does it let you retain copyright, or does it claim the rights to your material forever, so that you can't delete and repost it somewhere else if the site turns out not to meet your needs?
      -- Are earnings paid as a one time payment (like Fiverr), or does content keep earning month after month, long-term? Ongoing earnings tend to be small amounts each month, but can pile up over time until you've built up a meaningful income stream. Whereas if it's a one-time payment, you have to start over every month. Nooooo, I'm lazy, gimme my passive income!
      -- How likely is the site to stick around? Do a little background research, if you can, to learn who started it, how likely they are to hold on, or at least how long the site has already existed. The longterm earnings strategy only works if the site is going to endure.

    2. Marisa Wright profile image93
      Marisa Wrightposted 3 years ago in reply to this

      Greekgeek is right.  If you're looking for a site that's already got lots of content on your topic, you're thinking back to front.  You want a site that's weak in your field, so you can become the "guru" on that subject.

      Squidoo is probably the best from an income perspective.  It takes a bit more effort than the other alternatives, because they also have a version of the Featured/Idled process - which means you have to work to keep your Lenses active.  However it's not as harsh as the HubPages version.

      Greekgeek has a good Hub on what's involved:
      http://greekgeek.hubpages.com/hub/how-i … on-squidoo

      Other sites to consider are Seekyt, Wizzley, Infobarrel, Zujava, Xobba, PubWages, ThisisFreelance.  They don't have any process to feature/idle articles, which makes them more "set and forget".

      Good luck!

      1. CyclingFitness profile image92
        CyclingFitnessposted 3 years ago in reply to this

        Thanks Marisa and GreekGeek

        It may be time to have a look at Squidoo although I fear that it will not be a big money spinner for me in terms of the tier system of earnings. Amazon definitely tho

        Does anyone have experience of Demand Media- I know they provide for health and fitness sites like Livestrong.com

        1. CyclingFitness profile image92
          CyclingFitnessposted 3 years ago in reply to this

          Well I've published my first lens on Squidoo under the name cyclistliam although really feeling let down by what I'm seeing on the site. It seems like it's just a marketing tool for amazon and ebay. The amount of content is shocking in many of the sports and fitness articles which really let down a viewer coming to the site for information

          Many i'm looking at it wrongly again but if I search for information- I want information (with potential options to buy). Maybe the site will grow on me over time, we'll see. Otherwise it's a good potential backlink source

          1. Will Apse profile image91
            Will Apseposted 3 years ago in reply to this

            Info often trips the dupe content filter on Squidoo so writers have learned to write a lot of empty words. It is hardly the writer's fault.

            1. CyclingFitness profile image92
              CyclingFitnessposted 3 years ago in reply to this

              So the site has designed itself to be filled up with rubbish- and not information for a reader?

              1. Will Apse profile image91
                Will Apseposted 3 years ago in reply to this

                I imagine some people would disagree but you need to look long and hard for pages with any concentration of factual information. They like to talk about their 'originality pact' and say 80 per cent of the page must be absolutely original.

                So either you write about something very, very obscure. Or you really stretch out some copy-writing to go with your ads. Or you might be able to whip up a gracefully written, magazine-style piece around one or two simple facts that people enjoy but is not not much good for info seekers.

                I write for the money so I won't criticize the writers on Squidoo. I just think the institutional bias against data and facts is insane. Squidoo's super-powerful SEO is propelling so many poor, information deficient, pages to the top of the SERPs that Google could easily decide to hit the site with a manual penalty. Or it could just provoke more and more severe algo action against content farms (or user generated content if you think Squidoo is not a content farm).

                1. CyclingFitness profile image92
                  CyclingFitnessposted 3 years ago in reply to this

                  I'm not against writing for money- but from what I see there is very little writing with regards to sports and fitness related content which is my main interest and passion- which doesn't always involve selling a product- often it involves selling a point of view or workout for an athlete to use which doesn't necessarily bring in a revenue from ad- clicks or amazon purchases.

                  I'm going to see how a couple of specific cycling training lenses work on there as to providing information- it may be that such levels of information are more suitable to what I already do here on hubpages

                  With regards to the SEO which has raised profiles of poor pages- can you see this strength crashing potentially over time?

                  1. Will Apse profile image91
                    Will Apseposted 3 years ago in reply to this

                    This is Squidoo's 'lens of the day': httx://www.squidoo.com/skagen-men-s-titanium-black-mesh-watch.

                    I imagine lens of the day is designed to highlight content that Squidoo finds exemplary.

                    The two or three hundred words of text has one piece of info that you cannot find in the Amazon ad (wrist hair). Apart from that, it is an exercise in not saying anything that might trip a dupe filter.

                    If people are obliged to write for Copyscape rather than the reader this kind of page is one of the chief results.

                    And, yes, I would say that this kind of page does endanger a site. Fill a sub-domain here with similar and are guaranteed a visit from Panda.

                  2. Marisa Wright profile image93
                    Marisa Wrightposted 3 years ago in reply to this

                    In that case, you have two options:  you either stick to sites that pay per view (like the HP Ads program), or you concentrate on your own blog, where you can have a mix of helpful articles and sales pages (take a look at my website to see what I mean, there's a link on my profile). 

                    Personally I would strongly suggest the blog.  You have a subject you're both knowledgeable and passionate about.  It doesn't matte a d@mn whether other people already have blogs about the same topic - there's room for one more. PM me if you want some help getting it set up.

    3. Drive By Quipper profile image60
      Drive By Quipperposted 3 years ago in reply to this

      At which other sites should I write? Maybe you should stick around for awhile.

      1. CyclingFitness profile image92
        CyclingFitnessposted 3 years ago in reply to this

        Thanks Drive By Quipper, I never said I'd be going away- just looking at options to diversify. I've been very happy here on HP but at the end of the day I would like to make some more money (the aim is to at least pay my mortgage each month) so it pays to have your hands in a number of different pies.

  2. LindaSmith1 profile image60
    LindaSmith1posted 3 years ago

    Cyclling, the reality is that these sites pay by views, adsense which is ridiculous. Not going to make lots of cash on sites like this, unless you make it from affiliate marketing sales. The only other way is to go to various sites where you bid for jobs, wait til a client picks you to write articles for them,

  3. theraggededge profile image92
    theraggededgeposted 3 years ago

    CyclingFitness - I wrote for Demand Studio for over a year - about 150 articles. However, since they got very, very badly hit by Google, they have had to rethink their entire strategy. They pruned down the number of writers by their scores for grammar and research skills. No-one with a double score under 4 could apply for certain publications (which then became just about all of them). My grammar score was 3.9 and research score 4.2. Probably because I am British and we had to write 'American'. Their criteria for joining is now very strict.

    1. CyclingFitness profile image92
      CyclingFitnessposted 3 years ago in reply to this

      That's theraggededge

      I've noticed from what it's seen on Livestrong the content is very well written- but doesn't actually tell the viewer enough information. Which is a real shame as their content ranks highly with google.

  4. 0
    passion4fassionposted 3 years ago

    have you heard
    my lot have you seen this site its amazing site you can write post photos join forum and discuss  things  you learn at the same time you earn money