jump to last post 1-3 of 3 discussions (8 posts)

An interesting article about Panda and the damage to websites

  1. Xenonlit profile image60
    Xenonlitposted 4 years ago
    1. wilderness profile image95
      wildernessposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      The first set of numbers has quite a disagreement with Quantcast, which shows a considerable recovery since post panda days.  Wonder what the difference is?

      1. Sapper profile image70
        Sapperposted 4 years ago in reply to this

        It really isn't that different from Quantcast. There was a recovery, but it's been slowly dropping ever since.

        1. wilderness profile image95
          wildernessposted 4 years ago in reply to this

          Sure there is a difference.  The chart numbers indicate no recovery since the Panda hit.  Quantcast says this March is just about the same as the March prior to Panda.  A large recovery from post Panda months.

          1. Sapper profile image70
            Sapperposted 4 years ago in reply to this

            While technically true, then it was steadily going up, now it's spiking up and down, and more down than up. In no way, shape or form equal.

  2. Xenonlit profile image60
    Xenonlitposted 4 years ago

    The writers of that article used another service to commission their study. Maybe Quantcast is counting something else.

    1. wilderness profile image95
      wildernessposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      It seems so; something about "search visibility" is more of what they're talking about.  Some internal measurement they've come up with rather than traffic.

  3. tirelesstraveler profile image83
    tirelesstravelerposted 4 years ago

    Indeed this is and interesting article.

 
working