Here is a hub on a new reader feedback service that QAPped out. Any advice about how to get it over the bar would be appreciated.
I actually really enjoyed the hub! I thought it was well written and informative. The only thing I could possibly maybe sorta think of is that someone thought it came across a little to "advertiser friendly." I'm guessing it happens because someone didn't take the time to read thoroughly during the hub hopper. The only other suggestion I could possibly make would be maybe change the picture? In all honestly it could end up picking up traffic and being featured. Like I said I thought it was a good read and useful as well, so it's def a misjudgement on whoever's part.
I hadn't thought of it looking promotional. I will try and make it clearer that this is just something I came across online. I only found one other post written about it.
It's a little short for my taste, but provides all pertinent information and should pass word count tests.
First text capsule ends with a colon; although I do this myself I've often wondered if it is really acceptable.
Second capsule is too short. A subheading needs more than two sentences to justify it's existence.
Some criticism on wording; take it with a grain (or pound) of salt as I'm no expert here:
"Well the author pays $30 per review," could use a comma after "well" and none after "review".
"(reading books, that is)" While I find this perfectly acceptable, scorers may not.
"either 2 or 4 out of 5" Should the numbers be spelled out?
"and I ca be pretty judgmental" misspelling
"you can return it (of course you won't get paid)" might read "you can return it but of course you won't get paid
I'm trying to get into the mind of raters, probably not very successfully, so take this for what it's worth; probably very little.
Thank you very much for those proofing comments. I appreciate it!
Hi psycheskinner. Sorry to hear, I know the feeling from recent experience.
I read your hub and I agree with some of what others have said. I see how it could be read as promotional and it is rather short.
The information is good and your writing is obviously good; but we know that's not the issue.
I would add to the other critiques that it lacks visual appeal. Maybe add more images of books. Another suggestion is to add more text on the value of writer's reviewing each other's work as an opening paragraph. That would state the purpose of the article upfront and take away any misconception about you promoting the site.
A very interesting Hub that I felt is perhaps, too shallow a dive into the subject. I agree with Janshares that it would have a better feel with additional photos or graphics. I would love to see this expanded, as I was not aware such a service existed.
I think everyone caught what I saw: Potentially promotional and minor grammar errors.
If "overly promotional" isn't the real cause, the lack of media might be. When hubs are graded, one of the three big issues looked at includes good images that relate to the subject and visual layout appeal. You had one image, but I'd suggest adding more. Improving layout and subtitles might put you over that "6" needed to pass QAP.
by Mike Rogers5 years ago
Hello!Been "away" for a while, but spent a lot of time watching how Hubpages and the Google Panda wrestling match would shape up, and reading about the changes and additions to hub monetization by Hubpages.I...
by sofs6 years ago
This a hub that I have started to write about four days back.. I have written on this topic earlier and have done quiet a bit of work in this regard...but now I find that my thoughts will not flow..and I seem to be...
by Timothy Arends2 years ago
I decided to give hub hopping a try. I was curious to see how good (or bad) the hubs were. I found some good hubs, others not so much. After about my second or third hop, I came across a hub that read alright for the...
by Carolee Samuda4 years ago
(1) When we flag a hub the hub should become hidden from our screen. I don't think it makes sense voting since you already flag the hub. So that means when we flag the hub another hub will replace it. I flagged a hub...
by psycheskinner3 years ago
My latest 'overly promotion' warning is for three thinks to research articles on http://link.springer.com/This is a source of data I refer to, to back up scientific claims. I think it should be permitted?
by LongTimeMother3 years ago
I respect the work of many hubbers, but at the very top of my list is 'peeples'. I am a great fan of this extraordinary woman and when you go to her profile page you will see why. Peeples is now homeless. Follow this...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.