I published a hub a few days ago. It was one of the ones that took 24 hours to get featured.
Sure enough, Google dropped by during the pending stage. They graciously admired the noindex tag and departed.
Since being featured, Google has been by no less than three times. Yet, the article is still nowhere to be found on Google.
I was hoping for the article to be naturally indexed. For some intuitive reason, I figured that would have more weight than me asking Google to do it. Could be wrong on that, who really knows.
I'll give it another day or two. If still nowhere to be found, I guess I'll have to do the WMT thing.
Meanwhile, a peaceful Memorial Day Weekend for me it is. I hope the same for all.
"Not a week goes by when I don't see a website where somehow the "noindex, nofollow" meta tags have been inadvertently added to every page (or even just some pages) of the site." By Jill Whalen
"Completely drop a NOINDEX’ed page" Matt Cutts.
You may be right as some experts advise against using "noindex tags", even temporarily as it can cause traffic to stop or slow down to a trickle for some time after publication.
Now THAT really sux. This game is already tough enough without our deliberately shooting ourselves in the foot.
And a sincere thanks. I went ahead and informed Google of their depriving humanity of my latest endeavor.
Was it the one about PAA? Yup, it's not indexed by the G. My post on PAA about your hub, is what's showing! Heheh!
This is kind of a dumb quesiton I suppose , but where are you finding no index tags? I have never seen one but I could be looking in the wrong place
When your hub is in pending state, HP plasters a big, fat noindex tag on it. It then goes away when the hub is featured.
You can check if the noindex tag is lurking there at any time by right-clicking your hub and then selecting View Source. I then use the F3 browser search for "noindex" to avoid going blind looking for it.
It is like shooting yourself in the foot. The no index tag and messing around with the Hub Pages featuring and un featuring them is dumber than anything Hub Pages ever did. They should let everything flow naturally. This is what Google wants is natural flow. The robot tags are also messing with Google and its search patterns and crawls.
by Gary Anderson20 months ago
I thought if a hubpage was listed in Google search it was featured. But apparently that is not the truth. I guess I will keep the hubs up and run my own check on them.
by xpressrite2 years ago
So hubbers help? I had four hubs that went from the pending state to having the featured status. Originally they were all viewed on the page where you can hop hubs.Now I dont no where...
by Shauna L Bowling11 months ago
I recently had a hub un-featured for engagement, as the half-circle indicates. I think this is an unfair practice and should be eliminated entirely. Here's why I feel this way:Our hub traffic is often affected by the...
by Gemini Fox24 months ago
Published a hub on Oklahoma (please don’t get started on how it might be too generic – I had fun doing it). It became the template for my following hubs on Arizona and New Mexico. The Oklahoma...
by Paul Maplesden3 years ago
Hi there,I've been hearing discussions that noindexing hubs (because they are idled) impacts their backlinks in some way, and I'd like to find out if this is true.I've been researching this a bit online and have found...
by Faith Reaper3 years ago
I am just curious, all 92 hubs of mine are featured. In your opinion, should one delete (although Featured) any hubs where the score on a particular hub has eventually dropped way down from when it was initially...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.