In the past there was a lot of debate about the potential advantages of placing a full width image at the head of the article. Paul E was a great fan of this, and many people promoted the idea. There used to be an extra ad that appeared when a large image was at the top. Some people argued against this as it reduced the amount of text above the fold. In the new layout, shifting the ad that used to be in the text area to the right column, was presumably done to reduce the number of ads above the fold. The new layout has changed things. Could staff and authors please provide an update of the relative merits of having a large image at the top, and other advice about image placement with the new layout. Presumably there are stats available for comparison. This includes Pinterest optimization. Thanks
Very good subject to bring up, janderson. I often put large images up in that space. I am very interested in an update on that. Thanks .
My personal view is that it depends.
The concept of the "hero shot" comes from online shopping. If someone is searching for a product or service, and the first thing they see on arrival at a webpage is a gorgeous photo of that product or service, then that's a very effective selling tool. The reader knows they're in the right place and will happily scroll down to read on.
However if someone is looking for information, and the first thing they see on arrival is a gorgeous photo that doesn't answer their question, is that effective? Will they scroll down to read the information or will they think they've arrived at a frivolous page and click back to find something more serious?
You have only a few words at the start of your Hub to "hook" the reader and persuade them to read more. If you're using a large image at the top of the Hub, your visitor can't see those words.
We haven't studied traffic/shares etc by image placement recently, but I think high quality media does improve the user experience.
I wouldn't say there is a hard rule. A lot has to do with context, your subject and the quality of the media. That said, I think a leading high quality photo is perfect for recipes and finished products.
by Person of Interest14 months ago
Yep, got a HubPro notice over a week ago. Still no editor invasion. Presumably it's an indication of niche inclusion. I like niche inclusion.
by Dr. John Anderson4 years ago
The recent Panda update produced a typical change in traffic for HP shown below.I have often wondered why the change is so immediate and consistent. As shown in the image below it would suggest that the change is not...
by lbsf12 years ago
Hi guysBefore the google update I was on around 140 views per day, now down to 40 and its not rising back again. I have always tried to write high quality articles (if anything my highest quality article is the one that...
by FaisalKhan21215 years ago
I say thank you Panda for helping to restore quality content to search engine results. Hubpages definitely has gotten better-- the spam is gone and the cream is rising to the top. Also, I'm making more money...
by Jonathan Wylie3 years ago
If you go back and update an article that is not getting many views, do you change the title? If so, does this change the URL, and basically make it a new article in the eyes of search engines?
by Boots Iacono4 years ago
The person who normally proofreads my work for me is out for the week... can someone please proofread:http://bootsiacono.hubpages.com/hub/Boo … hip-Statusfor me?Thanks in advance,Boots
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.