Hi there, friends! Today I'm very excited to announce the first winner of the monthly Editor's Choice bonus. (Each month for the next year, a different Editor's Choice Hub will be randomly awarded $50 as part of our recent Editor's Choice Upgrade.)
Hi Christy. I followed your link to the first lucky hub ... and have come back with a suggestion for you.
With all the talk about the qualifications and professionalism of the new editors, it seems appropriate to have at least one of your editors take a look at your random winners before making the announcement and subjecting them to scrutiny by other hubbers.
I'm not suggesting for a moment they should rewrite the winning hubs, but it would be helpful if they spotted errors like 'spoonfulls' and 'Snicerdoodles' and advised the hubber to make corrections.
When you brand a hub Editor's Choice, you imply the hub was selected by an editor ... who presumably read it and awarded their personal seal of approval. As I recall, the EC initiative began before the announcement you had editors on board. However you do have editors now, so I hope you'll ask them to proofread your next 11 random winners.
Having said all that, I am happy for Julia and offer her my congratulations.
Wondering where we stand with regard to a new accolade for having more than 5 EC hubs or even a way for people to see this special distinction publicly on our hubs. Right now, we are the only ones who can see it - on...
Whoo-hoo! I've just had one of my hubs (about the Cardiff Giant hoax) selected as Editor's Choice. I'm really pleased as it shows I'm doing something right. However, when I've looked through the HP Forum Comments about...