I'm just following up on this discussion:
For the last two weeks I have read and monitored a lot of hubs (about 150 hubs) that have been labelled "Editor's Choice." Based on the ones that I read, about 90% of them I would NEVER read and the only reason I read them was purely for that label and also to see if I can get tips to improve my hubs and maybe get myself that prestigious label.
I've also seen several discussions of people that have that label complaining that their traffic has gone to the bin. So again I ask myself... "do these editor's wake up every morning and have a meeting of how to destroy hubs today?" Because quiet frankly I think this EC thing sucks. Take for example with the case of the discussion I mentioned above.
Her hub was positioned next to several hubs that had that label and I read all of the hubs and her hub was the best one and yet didn't have that EC title. So naturally a non hubber or a visitor passing by will not know that and they will opt to read the ones with labels because they look "cooler"
So now it seems to me that getting that label means "your hub is about to die a painful traffic-less death"
So for those of you that have EC labels, can you shed some light on here and tell us if your traffic improved or plummeted? I want to prepare myself in case I ever get that email that says "your hub has been selected" (which I highly doubt anyway).
My EC Hubs experience increased traffic over the non-EC Hubs most of the time. I still update them as needed, though - new pictures, that sort of thing.
All of my EC Hubs appear to be doing far better than the non EC ones at the moment.
If I received the monthly cash payout I would definitely feel it was worth opting in.
My chances might be better than my winning the lottery:)
The last staff report was that for any given hub being made EC versus being opted out did not effect traffic or earnings
You may see a difference between those selected for EC and those not selected, but that is about the kind of hub they are, not EC adding any value to the hub
Perhaps more interesting to note is that EC Hubs cover a very wide range of scores, One would expect them to score higher than the average hub but this is not always the case. Scores don't relate to views either apparently.
It will be interesting to see if that changes with the inclusion of the labels in the "related hubs" section. If it doesn't, the furor over those labels is misplaced.
It's not misplaced. It's justified by the mere intention.
The intention of the labels is apparently to reward those that put the effort into writing better hubs. And that justifies the outcry over them?
If that's the sole intention, then I rather regret the fact that none of HubPages' staff are creative enough to come up with a better idea.
Besides, those hubs are not necessarily 'better hubs'. In particularly because not all hubbers have opted into the program.
EC hubs are not better hubs but don't tell the thieves that. The main reason traffic stops on hubs that get tagged EC is because it's been copied somewhere in the nether world.
Personally, I find the EC hubs to be better on the average. There are lots of exceptions, both ways, but on the average they are much better than the average non-EC hub.
Wilderness - I have dozens of hubs labeled EC - and I am known for good content and good writing. I opted out recently for various reasons. Does that mean the hubs I wrote now have a lower quality than before? Does that mean they should be penalized because I opted out?
By the way - most were written prior to the "EC" effort & HP converted them to their own domain name when they created the program. My traffic went down, but I was trapped due to the AP program.
The reward for good writing should be for it to stand on its own merits, and not appear next to something that more or less says, "The editors picked this one! Read it now!"
Personally, when EC first came out, I read many of them. So, based on my reaction, EC matters because they get read by people looking for quality. Some of the EC hubs were awesome but some were very average. Calling them stellar will only disappoint readers and will not improve the image of HP. Several had spelling mistakes and one in particular, was paraphrased from a book read and having corrected many student papers, I can easily spot this.
HP has to raise the standards of what is stellar and clearly define these for the hubbers so they can aspire to that when they write.
I have three EC hubs, but all are over 18 months old. I feel they are all quite good quality and they have varying scores and traffic, though are far from being my highest traffic hubs (one actually has almost the lowest traffic of all my hubs). I don't seem to be able to meet the criteria any more for my recent hubs to be considered for EC. There seems to be pros and cons as to whether having the EC banner is beneficial.
by John Hansen21 months ago
I just received an email congratulating me for one of my hubs being selected as "Editor's Choice". It didn't tell me which hub was selected however and I checked my stats and there is no new hub labelled...
by Peg Cole18 months ago
I make it a habit to count my EC hubs just to make sure none have gone missing. (OCD) This morning I was surprised to see one of mine lost its designation overnight. There were no edits to it and it still has the same...
by Carolee Samuda2 years ago
I did a little experiment with opting into the EC program for three months. To begin with,last year one of my better performing hubs become Editor's Choice. That hub was getting an average of 20o+ views per day, peak....
by Lionrhod24 months ago
Now with all the fantastic hubs here, the likelihood that I'll be picked for Editor's Choice is pretty low.I've seen some scattered mention of how it works, but no definite clarity. So, for those of us who are new...
by Christy Kirwan19 months ago
Within the next few days, we will be adding some exciting long-awaited benefits to the Editor’s Choice program. Check out today’s Blog Post for the details.
by psycheskinner3 years ago
I finally got an EC for my highest scored hub at 94.
Copyright © 2016 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.