jump to last post 1-2 of 2 discussions (4 posts)

I'd like feedback on my Hub: Architecture In Tulsa

  1. Joe Cinocca profile image79
    Joe Cinoccaposted 17 months ago

    Hi Hubbers,

    I'd like some help with passing the Quality Assessment Process. Will you please give feedback on my Hub Architecture In Tulsa (must be signed in to view). What can I do to improve? Thanks!

    I only have one link in the article.
    Originally, I had given credit on every photo. There were only 2 people to credit, so I listed them just once.

    Is there too many keywords?
    I don't understand what I am doing wrong or why this is considered "spammy".

    Please help.

    1. calculus-geometry profile image85
      calculus-geometryposted 17 months ago in reply to this

      HP broadened the scope of its definition of "spammy" to mean articles that appear promotional.  The way you've linked to that architecture firm in Tulsa is likely the problem.

      1. Joe Cinocca profile image79
        Joe Cinoccaposted 17 months ago in reply to this

        Is there a better way to present a link or do I need to go link free?

  2. relache profile image86
    relacheposted 17 months ago

    I found the content to be more like "buildings that I like in Tulsa" and not really a discussion of architecture.  There's no discussion of architects/ designers of the buildings, of style periods, etc. and the images are all casual snaps of buildings at a distance, which really doesn't show case the structures or building features.

    That's what "architecture in Tulsa" implies to me.

    This site wants magazine-style articles of near-magazine-style quality.