Can someone claim copyright of a hi-def version of a public domain image?
I want to use images produced by the U. S. government and therefore in the public domain. They were digitized by a contractor that, IMO, often did a very bad job. Many of the images on the Library of Congress site (loc.gov) are lo-def, but hi-def versions exist. I found one hi-def I want to use at Corbis, which says it is "rights managed." But they often say that for images that are clearly in the public domain. I don't know how Corbis has a hi-def version when the only version available at loc.gov is lo-def.
However Corbis got their hi-def image, does the fact that it is a photo taken by a U. S. govt employee as part of their official duties mean that the hi-def version is just as much in the public domain as the lo-def version?
Corbis is claiming they have the rights and so you have to decide whether you want to ignore that and have them possibly take action against you --
IMHO for use on a hub the low def is sufficient
I don't see how anyone or any company can claim rights for any reason to a government photo.
By definition, those images "taken by a government employee as part of their duties" are in the public domain by default.
I don't see how any company can claim rights that have not been specifically granted to them by the government agency in question.
They chose to clean up the images on their own; that does not mean they own the image, IMO.
I'm not a lawyer, but that just seems sensible to me, and if they do or can claim such, it sure doesn't seem right or fair...
Corbis sees it differently, and fair use exception can only be definitely settled in court. They are an affirmative defense not a safe harbor.
To avoid any trouble, I would simply take the original public domain image and manipulate it myself instead of taking the work someone else has done on the image. Obviously you think that the hi def adds value.
by tamron3 years ago
I looked everywhere on bing but can't find if the images can be used or not and if they can be used who do you give credit too Bing or the link?
by Jeff Davis6 years ago
is it necessary to cite the origin of your photos if you downloaded them from somewhere? and is it necessary to copyright or somehow mark photos posted that you yourself has taken? thank you in advance for any input.
by mommyfreelancer7 years ago
Or do you really use your own? Some of the images I saw on some of the hubs looked like they were taken off the search engines. Am not very familiar with the policies, and it says that post only images that you have a...
by ruthwalker2 years ago
Hi there, joined HP a little while ago but only just got round to writing my first hub. It is going to be an historical piece but seem to be spending most of my time trying to find who owns copyright to the images I...
by Celina Martin3 years ago
Just wondering, is it necessary to mention source link while using photos from search engines. And, if I do will it be beneficial for my hub or not?
by Honey Halley4 years ago
Is it against copyright laws to take a photo of the cover or pictures inside my books to use in my hubs? or photos of portraits/paintings from unknown artists I have on my wall?
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.