jump to last post 1-2 of 2 discussions (22 posts)

New Capsule: Picture Caption

  1. Will Apse profile image90
    Will Apseposted 18 months ago

    Picture captions, alt tags and image attribution are a mess on HP.

    Why not introduce a new capsule solely for captions and attribution, entirely separate from the picture and its alt tag?

    When a hubber uploads a picture, tell them to add an alt tag. It should be the simplest description of the picture that they can manage. Tell them it is for the benefit of the visually impaired (who use read aloud software) and nothing else.

    I would allow no more than 10 characters in the field to keep out anything remotely like keyword stuffing. No HTML to keep out linkspam.

    Ideally, a picture caption capsule would magically appear beneath the picture when it was saved to the page. Otherwise, just add the capsule as an option. Tell hubbers that the capsule exists in the alt tag instructions.

    The text would be no different to any other text on the page except smaller and sat up to the picture above it.

    The image attribution field would say source (as now) and deliver a nofollow link.

    1. Venkatachari M profile image84
      Venkatachari Mposted 18 months ago in reply to this

      I don't see any problem in the capsules. I am able to read the captions of images. And regarding links, they have removed the links to be visible to registered members while browsing on hubpages. Only visitors can click on the links and go to the source pages.
      But image captions are clearly visible if you incorporated the caption. It is visible beneath your image and also on the browser while hovering over the image. So, there seems no problem.

      1. Will Apse profile image90
        Will Apseposted 18 months ago in reply to this

        The problem is the alt tags. Years ago some blackhat SEO fiends discovered that you could boost a page in the SERPS by stuffing keywords into the alt tags. Google noticed and developed a way to penalize this kind of practice.

        Alt tags should only be used for the purpose they were designed for. HP pretty much encourages misuse by making captions into alt tags.

        1. Venkatachari M profile image84
          Venkatachari Mposted 18 months ago in reply to this

          I am unaware of this. I don't know what alt tags are.

          1. brakel2 profile image86
            brakel2posted 18 months ago in reply to this

            The alt tag is the description of the photo which the Google bots cannot see, thus the description. HP uses the caption for the alt tag. It can be confusing. I added the license to my capsules for the Commons, by the way, and it did not take long.

        2. relache profile image89
          relacheposted 18 months ago in reply to this

          I agree with you Will, but find it highly-unlikely HubPages is going to "wake up" and fix this, given how long it's been a known and complained-about issue. 

          Accessibility of the site is something admin says is key, but clearly money-making accessibility trumps universal access for visually-challenged readers.

          1. Will Apse profile image90
            Will Apseposted 18 months ago in reply to this

            HP have cost issues, and ease of use issues (they do not want to scare away new writers). I reckon the alt tag issue is important enough to put a small, extra step into the publication process.

            We will see what they decide. The last thing we want is cost issues crippling the site.

    2. makingamark profile image70
      makingamarkposted 18 months ago in reply to this

      The bit I don't understand about the whole captions/alt tags thing is how what HubPages has done can be reconciled to a source's requirement to attribute the picture and link to it for some images.

      Are they saying that no picture can have a proper picture attribution as required by its source (i.e. one which allows its use BUT only on the basis of proper attribution)?

      I've checked a few of mine and they seem to have lost their attribution links - which I routinely included.

      To my mind it's very poor practice.

      I also agree that your solution might be one way out of this craziness - except for the fact that the attribution should at all times remain linked to the picture - otherwise it runs the severe risk of becoming orphaned.

      I wonder if anybody on HubPages ever read the "orphaned image" debate re copyright?

      1. Venkatachari M profile image84
        Venkatachari Mposted 18 months ago in reply to this

        The attribution is not lost. It is there. You log out from your account and then visit the page. Then hover the browser on your images. You will find a letter
        " i " on the right hand at  the top corner of your image. Click it and you will see the link and attribution visible to you.

        1. makingamark profile image70
          makingamarkposted 18 months ago in reply to this

          But the "i" does not appear unless your cursor hovers over it.  In other words if you just LOOK at the image you see nothing.

          I would interpret this as meaning it is "hidden"

  2. Will Apse profile image90
    Will Apseposted 18 months ago

    As long as there is correct attribution somewhere on page and it is clear which pic is being attributed that is fine.

    HP are fine with attributions at the foot of the page, so they clearly understand this.

    The main issue is to keep alt tags clean of any spamminess. The secondary issue is persuading hubbers to do the right thing.

    A clear two stage process is a little more time consuming but it is (almost) foolproof. Even a first time user should understand what is happening and why.

    For anyone interested in the subject here are a few hundred pages on keyword stuffing in alt tags:

    https://www.google.co.th/webhp?sourceid … alt%20tags

    1. brakel2 profile image86
      brakel2posted 18 months ago in reply to this

      Writer Fox says description of photo should be in caption and very brief in length with no keyword stuffing. He also says, per SEO, not to have a title for the photo to avoid more keyword stuffing. I put the source and photographer and now, the license in the source box, or whatever the site requires.. Other sources quoted here mention a very brief description in caption. Example: Man drinking Diet Coke, or Swimmer Riding the Ocean Waves. alt tag

      1. Will Apse profile image90
        Will Apseposted 18 months ago in reply to this

        There is nothing wrong with captions that are just plain text, except perhaps that they can also encourage repetition of keywords.

        Having H2 headers in picture capsules, on the other hand  is bad practice partly because they encourage hubbers to add extra keywords to the page in an unnecessary way.

        I also think H2 headers are an especially sensitive area because Google gives them extra weight when deciding what the page is about.

        We can't be sure how Google operates its anti keyword stuffing algos but using an H2 is pretty much like shouting.

        I try to minimize the use of keywords in any possibly sensitive area like alt tags, H2 headers, bolded or italic text and anchor text.

        I wouldn't go mad on this, of course, you need to be give your readers the info they are looking for.

        Natural English usage should do the trick. Overly optimized old style SEO written pages are a bad idea these days.

        1. brakel2 profile image86
          brakel2posted 18 months ago in reply to this

          Thanks, Will, for this additional explanation. Now, if hubbers would use these suggestions, photo capsules could improve. You have been a big help.

          1. Will Apse profile image90
            Will Apseposted 18 months ago in reply to this

            I try. Sometimes...

            By the way, could you give a link to the Matt Cutts video?

        2. DrMark1961 profile image91
          DrMark1961posted 18 months ago in reply to this

          H2?

          1. brakel2 profile image86
            brakel2posted 18 months ago in reply to this

            H2 is a secondary heading, such as the photo title. Note; I just read an article with a video by Matt Cutts that indicated a photo should not have a title and that all words should be in the alt tag (description). Why does HP have a photo capsule title if that is true?.

            1. DrMark1961 profile image91
              DrMark1961posted 18 months ago in reply to this

              Thanks.
              That comment from Matt Cutts is interesting. Blogger, which is owned by Google, has a place to leave captions but also includes alt tags. I think they should be separate but both included.

              1. brakel2 profile image86
                brakel2posted 18 months ago in reply to this

                He said a photo does not need a title, so you are correct. Many folks apparently do use both. Keyword stuffing is the issue to avoid.

                1. Elsie Hagley profile image82
                  Elsie Hagleyposted 18 months ago in reply to this

                  Thanks for sorting this out, I now understand,
                  I will remove the titles from my photos as it is adding to keyword stuffing unnecessary.

            2. Will Apse profile image90
              Will Apseposted 18 months ago in reply to this

              H2 headers in picture capsules are, at the very least, an unnecessary temptation for hubbers to mess up!

              Some hubbers even use a pic at the top of a page which has the keywords in the H2 header and the alt tag/caption.

              They then start the text with the keywords...

              This gives you the keywords four times in straight succession before the end of the first sentence ---Title, H2, alt tag, first sentence. Not a great start.

              If people add an H3 sub header with keywords at the start of the text, that gives you 5 straight repetitions, four of them in areas Google pays special attention to.

              1. brakel2 profile image86
                brakel2posted 18 months ago in reply to this

                I cannot relocate that video, but the issue was about avoiding keyword stuffing, if you use a title tag for an image, as you explained above. I believe I erred if I said the video said to not use a title on an image.

 
working