jump to last post 1-1 of 1 discussions (5 posts)

I'd like feedback on my Hub: Rainbow Nature: Fungus

  1. Margaridab profile image76
    Margaridabposted 2 weeks ago

    Hi Hubbers,

    I'd like some help with passing the Quality Assessment Process. Will you please give feedback on my Hub Rainbow Nature: Fungus. What can I do to improve? Thanks!

    1. DrMark1961 profile image92
      DrMark1961posted 2 weeks ago in reply to this

      It seems a little disorganized. I think you should put the photo of the bioluminescent fungi, the description, and then the video all together. Do the same thing with the others too (instead of having all of the photos together, all of the videos together, most of the text in the big block at the beginning of the hub, etc.)
      Also, I think there are way too many links. (I have seen comments from other people on the forums that this does not affect the QAP process.) It would be better to provide most of the material in your hub, and then maybe a few appropriate links.
      Finally, a comment about the title, but it may have nothing to do with QAP. What is the hub about? Does the title reflect that? I do not think you will get much traffic with that title, and I would change it to something like "Amazing Rainbow Colors of Mushrooms". Not many people are going to bother reading "Rainbow Nature: Fungus". This is my opinion. If you like your title a lot, just ignore that comment.
      Boa sorte!

      1. Margaridab profile image76
        Margaridabposted 2 weeks ago in reply to this

        Thank you for your answer. I'm going to try your tips .  Reorganize, cut some links and change the title.

    2. theraggededge profile image92
      theraggededgeposted 2 weeks ago in reply to this

      You also need to know how to credit your Wikipedia/Wikimedia photos. Stating the source as 'Wikipedia' is insufficient.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia … _Wikipedia

      "You can use (free) images from Wikipedia on your own site, or anywhere you like. You can use images that are freely-licensed images, provided you comply with the individual image's license terms. While all article text is licensed under the GFDL, free images have several free content licenses to choose from. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Free licenses for the many possibilities. You can use them on any appropriate page on Wikipedia. You can even use them outside of Wikipedia, such as on a website, in printed material, anywhere! All "free" image licenses allow these uses, provided you follow the license's terms for attribution and usage."

      An example of individual license terms:

      "This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.    
      You are free:

              to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
              to remix – to adapt the work

      Under the following conditions:

              attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
              share alike – If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one."

      See that 'attribution'? Click on any Wiki image and it will take you to a page where you can see who created the image, how it is licensed and how to attribute the creator.

      1. Margaridab profile image76
        Margaridabposted 2 weeks ago in reply to this

        Thanks for the opinion! I'm going to better credit the photos.