Obama is set to sign huge anti-smoking legislation which basically gives the FTC the authority to regulate tobacco. I'm not a smoker, but giving a government authority this much power in a retail trade makes me a bit nervous.
I'm of the mind that if someone wants to risk their life by not wearing a seatbelt, so be it. If someone wants to kill themselves by smoking, that's their call. Neither of these risk other people. Do they cost the taxpayers money along the way? Perhaps. But so do the millions of jobless young women out there having babies, and you don't see the government sterilizing them.
What are your thoughts?
I feel that smoking does put we non-smokers at risk. It pollutes our environment and studies have shown that second hand smoke does harm people. Also, smokers have more health issues and the costs of that health care are passed on to the public in various ways.
I do understand your concern about "Big Brother" and how far should our government be allowed to go? However, they pass these laws for the benefit of the whole.
I see your point about jobless young women having babies. And I certainly would not endorse a sterilization program. In both cases what I would heartily endorse are educational programs to prevent both.
by Ralph Deeds6 years ago
SENATE PASSES SWEEPING FINANCE REFORM BILL 59-39The Senate on Thursday approved a far-reaching financial regulatory bill, putting Congress on the brink of approving a broad expansion of government oversight of the...
by Reality Bytes4 years ago
Even though he stated he would veto the bill if it included the indefinite detention of Americans, Obama signed the NDAA bill in to law. Now an injunction is administered by a judge questioning the...
by Alexander A. Villarasa3 years ago
Nowadays, almost everyone and everybody seem to have something to gripe about ObamaCare. From the onset of its introduction to the American people, soon after Obama was elected President in 2008, the Tea...
by MikeNV6 years ago
Or should they just be voted on and made into law and "fixed" later.Maybe this is the new Government Paradigm.Make laws that only a select few are privy too... then just fix them later.That's an interesting...
by GA Anderson22 months ago
Probably a tough discussion to have, since the exact details can't be confirmed, but here are a few "understood" parts.1. "The deal" would have a limited life. Current gossip has it as a 10-year...
by fishskinfreak20086 years ago
Web-site/URL: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100308/ap_ … h_overhaul"President Barack Obama accused insurance companies of placing profits over people and said Republicans ignored long-festering problems when...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.