jump to last post 1-9 of 9 discussions (25 posts)

Banned for titties

  1. Jellyrug profile image60
    Jellyrugposted 7 years ago

    If i post a hub with a titties picture, no sex, no porn, just some titties showing, will I be in trouble?

    1. 0
      Sidney Rayneposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Yes I had a similar inquiry...in posting artwork and a few of my tattoo's I would be subjecting myself to possibly violating rules of pornography....though I think the premise may be a tad different...consisting of sharing art rather than posting a "titties picture"

    2. Ron Montgomery profile image60
      Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Only one way to find out.
      Have some balls, show some titties.

      1. Jellyrug profile image60
        Jellyrugposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        Help a brother out here man, I'm really trying to behave you know.

        http://i300.photobucket.com/albums/nn2/Jellyrug/Naughty.jpg

        1. Ron Montgomery profile image60
          Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago in reply to this

          That one's ok, try another.

          1. Jellyrug profile image60
            Jellyrugposted 7 years ago in reply to this

            OK, let's turn up the volume ever so slightly.

            http://i300.photobucket.com/albums/nn2/Jellyrug/Titties.jpg

    3. blondepoet profile image80
      blondepoetposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      http://i228.photobucket.com/albums/ee273/srporter_2007/funny.gif

  2. Maddie Ruud profile image81
    Maddie Ruudposted 7 years ago

    Well, one of the simplest rules is: No visible nipples.  Women in bikinis, non-sheer underwear, etc, is generally ok.

    1. Ron Montgomery profile image60
      Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      You couldn't have waited a few minutes? mad

      1. Maddie Ruud profile image81
        Maddie Ruudposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        Well, it's more efficient for me to prevent someone from publishing something that's going to have to be taken down anyway.  Saves both him and myself some time.  It's supremely annoying to have to scroll through pages and pages of half-naked pictures looking for a single stray nipple.

        1. 0
          dennisemattposted 7 years ago in reply to this

          sorry but thats funny. must be why u have the job and not ron

          1. Maddie Ruud profile image81
            Maddie Ruudposted 7 years ago in reply to this

            He'd leave 'em up. wink

        2. Ron Montgomery profile image60
          Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago in reply to this

          If you're to busy, I'd be glad to help.  Just direct me to the hubs that are suspected of displaying semi-frontal female nudity, and I will investigate them at once.  I promise to report back in a week or two.

          1. 0
            dennisemattposted 7 years ago in reply to this

            lol

      2. 0
        sbeakrposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        oh ron...thank you for making my day with your hysterical comment.

        i love a good titties post. always eye-catching.  big_smile

        what's the deal with 'omg! nipples!' for crap's sake? america's missing-nipples fetish is freakish. that's got to be saying something, but i don't know what.

  3. Lady_E profile image81
    Lady_Eposted 7 years ago

    I guess if they are completely bare, you might be banned. I published a Hub sometime ago with photo's of 2 nude women. One just about covered her boobies with one hand.

  4. bgamall profile image85
    bgamallposted 7 years ago

    I think Roman statues are ok. Just paint your booby lady white, like statue white, lol.

  5. Ron Montgomery profile image60
    Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago

    http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/ul/347-MonkeytitsW.jpg

    We may need a ruling here

    1. all_time_guy profile image73
      all_time_guyposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      no display of boobs, you are banned smile

  6. 0
    Sidney Rayneposted 7 years ago

    I would appreciate a ruling as I am not a fan of censorship sans gratuitous pornographic material....art should have the ability to be viewed in it's intended state

    No nipples....fair enough.

    http://216.77.188.54/coDataImages/p/Groups/13/13145/folders/25183/2419883deviltattooedited.JPG

    Granted there is a line with this subject...I don't care to cross it...but I also don't appreciate being subject to senseless censorship. However....I am more than willing to not post non-edited artwork of mine in exchange for not opening the door to this site being over run by naked pictures under the guise of art. Ruling appreciated.

    **Edit...removed non-edited image in accordance with the rules according to HubPage staff. Regards, Sidney

  7. Ron Montgomery profile image60
    Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago

    I reeeeeeeeeeeally hate to be the one to say this, but I think the point is that there are about 200 gajillion places on the web to look at titillating (insert joke here) content.  If much more was allowed than currently is, some of YOU people wouldn't be doing anything other than looking at pix when you visit the forums.

    1. 0
      Sidney Rayneposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Agreed...but for those of us that wish to share their work in the process of writing I think this remains to be a topical subject with shades of gray.

      1. Ron Montgomery profile image60
        Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        You write and expose your breasts at the same time? yikes

  8. Ron Montgomery profile image60
    Ron Montgomeryposted 7 years ago

    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_UEGy-8c06F8/SKx4TXnra2I/AAAAAAAAErM/wuHae_-vyIM/s400/nun10.jpg

    The next person to show the unholy blossoms will answer to us!

  9. Maddie Ruud profile image81
    Maddie Ruudposted 7 years ago

    Enough!  The original question's been answered...

Closed to reply
 
working