jump to last post 1-3 of 3 discussions (6 posts)

Can you believe this ? Watch this video

  1. thecounterpunch profile image58
    thecounterpunchposted 9 years ago
  2. Ralph Deeds profile image69
    Ralph Deedsposted 9 years ago

    Can I believe this? In short, "No!" I wonder who publishes this shit?

  3. Ralph Deeds profile image69
    Ralph Deedsposted 9 years ago

    Just what is the "New World Order?" And what's so bad about it? If the U.S. is trying to establish a "new world order" they have really screwed up in Iraq and the Middle East.

    1. thecounterpunch profile image58
      thecounterpunchposted 9 years ago in reply to this

      It's "defined" by Bush Father, Cheney and Clinton alike (Clinton even refered himself to Georges W. Bush Senior):

      "Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective - a new world order - can emerge...We are now in sight of a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders."

      -- Bush Senior


      What's agenda: a One World Government, that's explicit in the videos above. That's the aim of Globalization. And for pretexting Globalization they pretext Global Problems see Rockfeller's Newsletter 2006:

      United Nations will be this One World Government controlled both by the United States and Europe reenforcing the power they already share through the World Bank (always an American at the head) and the IMF (always an European at the head - see Confessions of Economic Hit Man: http://hubpages.com/hub/Confessions_of_ … ic_Hit_Man )

      Visit TrilateralCommission.org created by Brzezinski - author of "The Grand Chessboard - American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives" http://hubpages.com/hub/THE_GRAND_CHESSBOARD which is the blue print BEFORE 9/11 happened of US Irak attack today and Eurasia tomorrow) for David Rockfeller who is member for life and you will know who will manage this One World Government: Bankers and Businessmen Super Elites of the World - probably behind puppets elected with electronic votes at the United Nations.

      That's why people are fooled to believe that the United  Nations will be an opponent to Bush and Neocons / Neofascists: today the United Nations faints to be but that's just a Propaganda Ruse of Hegelian Dialectic (http://hubpages.com/hub/How_propaganda_works) to push public opinions notably Europeans (French are the first supporters of UN) to believe that United Nations as Super True Power will counter the Military Power of United States whereas that's exactly what the Global Elites want: French Intellectuals in Medias are often American Bashers and since Americans are portraited to be anti-UN, by opposition French are for UN as they think it will oppose US. This is just what you do with Kids when you faint to forbid them something and they will just do the contrary.

      People can be astonished that the United Nations is what the Global Elites want as One World Government but it's because they ignore History for United Nations is the descendant of the Leagues of Nations originally crafted under Colonel House also founder of the CFR organization directly linked to the Rockefeller:

      By the way the building of United Nations has been offered by Rockefeller and Rockfeller is symbolic of the Banking establishment. The Chase Bank of Rockefeller ( http://hubpages.com/hub/The_Chase_Bank and http://hubpages.com/hub/the_Federal_Res … f_New_York ) is now known to have been involved in Nazism see Declassified National Archives "Chase National Bank, Jewish Accounts, and Nazi Germany": http://www.archives.gov/iwg/about/press … -2004.html

      New World Order is just a remake of Fascism / Nazism / Communism: there's no difference between Bush New World Order and Communism / Nazism Order: the difference is just superficial, what people see whereas the design is the same as Writer Chesterton remarked it:

      "Capitalism and Communism are so very nearly the same thing in ethical essence, that it would not be strange if they did take leaders from the same ethnological elements"


      For New World Order is not so new: "Creating Order, Refing Order and Preserving Order"  has been set up in 1841 by Clinton Roosevelt - ancestor of the Roosevelt - who directly funded and inspired Karl Marx's Manifesto a few years later - through a newspaper they created and Karl Marx was on the pay of this newspaper) :

      http://hubpages.com/hub/Science_of_gove … atural_law

      As for the Ultimate Aim of New World Order it's the same as always: it's about Warfare for "The primary aim of modern continuous warfare is to maintain the stability of a hierarchical or pyramidal society." -- George Orwell 1984

      That is really according to Aaron Russo Interview about Nicholas Rockfeller who tried to recruit into the CFR - Council of Foreign Relations:
      http://hubpages.com/hub/Astonishing_Int … ockefeller

    2. thecounterpunch profile image58
      thecounterpunchposted 9 years ago in reply to this

      They have screwed up in OUR eyes, not in THEIR eyes: they have won big contracts paid with YOUR TAX money. That's exactly what John Perkins said - he was a former Chief Economist formerly recruited by the Secret Agency (http://hubpages.com/hub/Confessions_of_ … ic_Hit_Man) - in this video about Irak's supposedly mess:
      http://hubpages.com/hub/Google_Videos_o … ic_Hit_Man

      It's just the same money laundering scheme used by Big Corporations with the help of governments themselves for it happens in the whole world as revealed by the number three of former Cleastream Financial Institution here:

      With one single World Government the scheme will be even easier for them .

      Pumping People's tax has been used by Bush-Cheney to build their fortune through Halliburton Corporation http://hubpages.com/hub/THE_BUSH-CHENEY_DRUG_EMPIRE
      with taxpayer-insured loans.

      The recipe is as old as one can remember the "founding father of international finance": - title given by Forbes Magazine in 2005 - Mayer Amschel Bauer the first Rothschild:

      "Through his experience with the Oppenheimers, Meyer Rothschild learned that loaning money to governments and kings was much more profitable than loaning to private individuals. Not only were the loans bigger, but they were secured by the nation's taxes".


      So why do you think Irak is a mess for them ? It's huge profits. As for the consequence they pretend - believe them or not - it's kind of "unfortunate collateral effect" of Modern Finance.

    3. thecounterpunch profile image58
      thecounterpunchposted 9 years ago in reply to this

      What's so bad ? Here it is - and it is written in Black Ink by the same Brzezinski, Rockfeller and Bush Advisor, who has written the blue-print of Irak war and others in the future before 9/11 (http://hubpages.com/hub/THE_GRAND_CHESSBOARD).

      Battlefield of the Future: Brzezinski, Rockefeller and Bush National Security Advisor, is targeting Your Mind
      http://hubpages.com/hub/Battlefield_of_ … _Your_Mind

      Excerpt of his book "Between two ages" (you can buy on Amazon http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/ … amp;sr=8-1):

      "Technology will make available, to leaders of major nations, a variety of techniques for conducting SECRET WARFARE, of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need to be appraised.


      It is possible--and TEMPTING--to exploit, for strategic-political purposes, the fruits of research on the brain and on human behavior. ...Accurately timed, artificially excited electronic strokes could lead to a pattern of oscillations that produce relatively high power levels over certain regions of the earth.