Is it better to have a certain number of keyword phrases in your hubs, i.e. 3-4 keyword phrases?
OR is it better to do it by percentage like 2-6%?
If you use one of the other, what metric do you use? If you do it by #, how many do you use? If you do it by %, etc?
if you use a formula it won't read right. if it doesn't read right it won't produce. If your key words are your topic and you write about your topic you will have it covered.
Use a percentage, not a number. The number of Keywords should depend on the length of the article. Either way, keep the writing natural and the keywords will take care of themselves.
I just check that the main key phrase is in the URL, the titltle, description and the conclusion. Plus however many the text demands naturally in between. I couldn't cope with formulas so I'm glad people say it'll take care of itself.
If you find it hard to keep track of keyword density, then try to break up the hub into smaller subheadings. You can use one text capsule for each subheading, and let your keywords appear there.
Eg, Introduction to xxx
Why xxx is important
How to make use of xxx
They way I do it is write the article based on a certain keyword or phrase but do not concentrate on the number or % of use. Write the whole article so it makes since and reads well. Now when that is done go back and find where you can insert the phrase and have it still make sense to readers
I took one hub and re-wrote pieces of it as an experiment. I used 2% KW density. It reads just a little bit clunky, but not spammy at all.
There were a couple other KW tricks I had read about that I put in too, just to see what happens.
It is by far my most viewed hub. I get a few views from Yahoo Search, but 95% are coming from Google. (And, it's not the most interesting topic in the first place, so I'm real happy with it.)
I wouldn't worry about keyword density. I'd focus on covering the topic in detail and creating useful information. Almost always, information that is created naturally does better in serps than keyword pumped content that reads clunky.
The only keyword thing I pay attention to is how competitive the the phrase is. For example, getting traffic for highly competitive terms is often a stretch, so I prefer to find a niche keyword with less traffic, but a good opportunity to get some of it, then none of a large, but very competitive term. Make sense?
It does make sense
But at the same time, the hub I messed around with is the only one in that group that is not zeros every single day. I'm not about to rewrite any more hubs though.
Granted, my stuff is not really popular. But even with the keywords that I think should be getting some traffic, I'm striking out. So, clearly I am missing something
Thanks for the advice!
by Ru-an6 years ago
I heard someone say that if possible your hub title should be the exact keyword that you use as your main keyword, if you want to rank high in search engines. But that doesnt allow for a catchy title which will get you...
by Syed Hunbbel Meer5 years ago
How much density of keyword do you prefer in your articles? OR in other words, how many times you use your main keyword in a 500-600 words article? And do you also mix up other permutations of that main keyword? If yes,...
by Nathan Bernardo3 years ago
I guess it seems simple: Too many keywords, too often, in one article. But what if your title is nothing but keywords, yet they are relevant? Is that too dense? I understand that tricksters try to pack irrelevant...
by Thomas Byers8 years ago
I thought I would start publishing some search engine tips to help everyone to get some extra hits from the search engines.1. Long TailDo you know what the Long Tail is. Its where you use a 3-5 word title for your Hub...
by kschang5 years ago
With my own hub as an example... I won't show you the hub, but I'll just tell you it's my most popular hub. The hub was started in April of 2010 as sort of a joke, but steadily grew and grew, and grew. In September of...
by Susana S5 years ago
I don't think I'm alone in thinking that the main thing that has dragged hubpages down in this latest algo change is the amount of crappy content posted on here over the years. I understand the reasoning behind the...
Copyright © 2016 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.