take a photograph of a nightclub and use it as a illustration on your site without the owners permission? I don't see why not because its your own photo and its a public space..just wondering what y'all thought
I think so long as you don't put the club in a negative light, I think it's ok and so long as you have something useful to contribute to your photo, then I think that's fine, if there was anything wrong with doing this then the nightclub owners could object and the worse thing that could happen is they ask you to take it off your site, but that hardly happens for local pubs, clubs and stuff that would be actually and advertisement for the place anyway, free advertising I might add.
Absolutely! In fact notate that the pic was used and taken with the owners permission and notate his name.
Hey thanks wayne, Its not putting the club in a negative light.. I just used it as a background image..
Any image you take yourself you own, and is copyrighted by you. Therefor you can use it on your website anywhere you want, even if the article was negative.
I take pictures of Disney all the time and use them, plus all the other theme parks down here in Orlando. I can't use a Disney photo from their own site that they took, although you could put a link to their site with it.
But any I take myself I can use anywhere I want, any time I want. Same is true for youtube videos people take at events. You own that video and you own the copyright on it, as you made it.
So as long as you took that picture you could use it and say the place is a dump, it's your own picture you hold the rights to.
Any image you take is copyrighted by you, true.. BUT some big corporations actually file a trademark on the building.
If this is the case then you need the owner to sign a property release. Just because a building is in public doesn't necessarily mean you can publish your picture. There is an exception if its a new story. If you would profit in any way from the image you would need that property release for trademarked buildings. If I remember right sometimes artwork is also trademarked. I know with the Eiffel Tower no one is allowed to publish night time pictures of it without prior permission.
I found this out the hard way after I bought a professional camera and planned to take pics of all the major Hotels on the Las Vegas Strip to sell as stock photography on istockphoto.com. I have 1 approved picture on istockphoto. I have since sold the camera. It is very unlikely that your neighborhood bar or club has a trademark on the building.
@Bill Manning - As big as Disney is I would bet you dollars to dimes they DO have trademarks on their famous landmarks. Try printing up some postcards and advertise them for sale in the local FL. newspaper if your really want to gamble like your in Vegas. Mickey Mouse's peeps are gonna come to pay you a little visit.
If your pictures have people that can be identified and your going to profit from the pictures, like say a poster or postcard or even a web page with ads, guess what. You need a model release. You may own the rights to your pictures but you don't never own the right to publish people in your pictures for profit! Buildings, with no trademark you may.
iStockphoto's property release: http://www.istockphoto.com/docs/propertyrelease.pdf
CYA time - I'm not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV. I can not offer legal advice. You are advised to seek competent legal advice from a lawyer, or risk getting your @$$ sued
@mywebs I have never heard about copyrighting buildings before, that really is incredibly worrying!
It can and has been done.
The Eiffel Tower at night (with the lights on) is trademarked, apparently.
You need permission to use the image or to sell it. So other than happy snaps you can't try and make any money from it or use it for promotion.
Good job they disintegrated it in the recent GI Joe film and it must be true because they caught it on camera ....go Cobra!
http://www.patentcopyrighttrademarkblog … hitecture/
has some limited info about property release and how it relates to publically viewable buildings
and some very specific info about disney and trademarks..photos you would be getting on private property
by Jean Bakula5 months ago
Has anyone at Hubpages ever received a bill for using an Artist's work or a Photographer's Photo on a a hub? And if so, how much? I'm curious, because I've written to artists about twenty five times during my time...
by Sarra Garrett4 years ago
Ok, I'm so aggravated right now. But that's fine, I'll get over it. What in the world is a pixalated picture. I changed my pictures I can't count on one of my hubs and it was unpublished today. ...
by TINA V7 years ago
I believe on the value of confidentiality of online writers. Hubpages do provide that leeway to all hubbers to decide the kind of profile pictures to post. However, no offense to anybody but I just felt...
by ryankett2 months ago
Now that I have a camera with a half decent resolution I am considering making some of my pics available for microstock sites, I am attracted to the idea of another residual income, even if that income is modest.I would...
by Evan Martin3 years ago
I recently read the article posted by the site on picture and I am curious as to how strict people are with photo use, because when I search on commercially allowable photos on Google the results leave little to be...
by Dorsi Diaz5 years ago
I am working on one of my new websites - and I want to link back to my hubs here. How many times is this OK to do on a website page before it is overkill?
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.