I don't check my traffic sources in my Hubpages account panel on a regular basis, but today was one of the days I did hae a look and am wondering if it is the same for other hubbers.
In my hub stats, it says I have just over 11k total views(not great but I'm working on it). Then when I hop over to the Traffic Sources section, it shows where the viewer came from. Here is the break down:
#1 Google 6,110
#2 Hubpages 1,329
#3 Yahoo 762
The next are all variations of Google including images .au, .co.uk etc.. and ezine articles. Then way down the list I see:
#12 Bing 57
I know Bing is gaining slowly in market share with all their advertising, and I am in no way claiming by my paltry 11k views that nobody uses Bing, but is there a trick for ranking on Bing? Does Bing not give a boost to rev share sites like Google does?
I am curious to see some Bing stats from other Hubbers(no need to post hard numbers if you don't want to), how far down the list is Bing for you?
Bing is approx #4 for me in traffic sources, if you combine google and yahoo variants. I've got a few Hubs that turn up very high for common search terms with them. Bing seems to like older, longer-established Hubs and isn't as warm to newer ones.
Looking at my stats, Bing looks like an epic fail. Microsoft should just buy Google.
Concur on the epic fail. I'd post my results as well but the "Myaccount" section of the site seems to be broken with the introdction of the contest.
If you bing the keyword "maps" you won't find bing maps, which is by far the best maps app on the web. So don't bother trying to figure out how bing works when they (MS) don't know how to make their own site show up in their own serps.
hubpages.com 196 1101 5217 16291
images.google.com 39 347 671 1219
google.com 45 181 603 929
bing.com 5 19 164 447
The above is exactly how my stats are presented on Traffic sources page. My total views are just over 23,000 views.
I just dont think the hubs traffic sources page is very accurate.
For a couple of months I used a URL tracker only for twitter.
It shows 3.2K views under URL trackers.
But under "traffic sources" only 230 views are shown?
On my traffic sources Bing sends less traffic than aol search or google germany! and is the 11th one down.
I also noticed that yahoo.mail sent me -1 views today
Conclusion, I never even open traffic sources, analytics is my friends instead
so I checked my sources under analytics, it shows 484 Bing views - compared to 430 shown by Hubs - thats really not that bad of a discrepancy
On HP I don't think Ive got one hit yet from Bing...
On one web page of mine thats established and gets about 1,000 hits per day I grabbed these stats.
Sources Visits % visits
I get more direct traffic than Bing's paltry 2.92% .. I don't even worry about Bing and very little about Yahoo. This web page ranks equally well in all 3 search engines, like top 3 or so on each. So it is a fair comparison.
Based on my keywords, ranking well on Bing isn't worth the effort. Google is all I care about. Yahoo is good for a quick fix when a hub / page is new and fresh, thats about it.
I feel so dumb, I thought you said bling and I was ready to rap gems. :
I am also doing terribly with bing. I have more views from digg.com! LOL
Anytime I see "Bing" I think only of Bing Crosby!
But bing.com is number six in my traffic sources.
Google is really the only search engine worth going for, on all my stats it regularly hold up a huge portion of my visitors.
You could try optimizing for Yahoo or Bing, but in both cases you are doing the same work you would for Google, but for a small percentage of the traffic.
Re "Google the only search engine worth going for" - I'm scared of having all my eggs in one basket. It would be nice to have traffic from Yahoo and Bing too.
Re optimizing for Yahoo and Bing being the same as for Google - if it was the same surely all three engines would be delivering the same search results as regards rankings? But they are not. So there must be something very different about their algorithms.
Bing- considers age of page, external linking, fresh content etc etc. Bing can only fetch traffic from computers where users are using IE a lot than any other browser.
by Marie Gail Stratford2 years ago
Most of my traffic from search engine used to come from Google. However, over the past month, my Hubs are getting more hits from Bing and Yahoo instead. In doing SEO research, I generally try to play to Google, so I'm...
by Drew Breezzy7 years ago
What are your top 3 traffic sources? not including hubpages
by cryptid4 years ago
Looking down my list of traffic sources I have two search sites (avg and comcast) that each say "-1" views over the last 24 hours. What in the world does that mean? I assumed it's a stats glitch or...
by Aficionada5 years ago
Ever since the switch to subdomains, I have seen specific subdomain names listed on the traffic stats for individual Hubs; and on the Traffic Sources Page, the numbers for HubPages have seemed to decline...
by Anas Shad4 years ago
While I was in the forums, i saw a lot of hubbers complain about the effect of the Google Panda on their traffic and earnings. Some even so disappointed that they were thinking about quitting hubpages. I was wondering...
by BeatsMe3 years ago
Hi, I have noticed that for a few days now, while the traffic stats are updating, our traffic sources are not. Has anyone else noticed this too?
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.