I see this term increasingly at writing sites online, and to me, it makes NO sense whatsoever. This is a somewhat lengthy post to make my point, but I do have a related question at the end.
Plagiarism is a violation of copyright; one person taking another's work and presenting it as their own. It is actionable in a court of law.
Since you cannot sue yourself, and you own the copyrights to your own works, it would seem obvious that you are free to use them whenever, however and wherever you see fit.
Unless you have published your work online with a publisher who requires signing over to them all the rights (in a 'work for hire' scenario--as with Demand Studios, e.g., which publishes on e-How and some other how-to and self-help sites), you still own your rights to your digital works.
Since Hub Pages is not a 'work-for-hire' site, and makes it clear that we retain all our copyrights and all rights to our works posted here, ownership of copyright is not the issue here.
If you have published a physical book with a traditional publisher, granting them, for example, "First North American Rights." there is a time limit before which you may not re-publish that content anywhere; that is in the contract you sign. Once the contractual time limit expires, you are free to re-use the work-you still own the copyright.
However, if you have, for instance, a blog, and use that material to re-post elsewhere, that is not plagiarism by any legal definition. You don't have to be a lawyer to know this; anyone able to read can figure it out.
The concept of so-called "self plagiarism" is so ludicrous as to be laughable. You simply cannot plaigiarize yourself!
That said, I do understand sites such as Hub Pages wanting original content, and not the same articles you've written once simply copied and wallpapered across cyberspace. I simply object to the terminology. It is incorrect.
I also understand that plastering the same content across multiple online sites can be detrimental vis-a-vis Google search and ratings, so I don't do it. However, this does bring up my reason for this post--that question:
I have already published, here on HP, a particular very brief poem as part of a colleciton of equally brief poems. I grouped them together with others of similar topic so as not to have that hub classified as "sub-standard" for being too short.
Yesterday, I re-worked ONE of the group, which was "almost" a Haiku, and turned it into an actual Haiku (it is very close to the same; I merely edited a few words for syllable count) It would do well as a stand-alone with a photo. If I publish that poem and photo in a hub of its own, would HP consider that as 'copying'?
Thank you for any clarification.
For lack of a better word, those that use the term, 'self-plagiarism' mean that one has taken one's work on another site and used it on a second site which wants only unique work - and not one's work that has been published on another site.
It's a misnomer. Probably, a word for it doesn't exist.
One could say that one only want's 'first rights' not 'second rights', but that's not quite right either...
by LindaSmith12 years ago
Apparently there are those who do not know what plagerism is! But I am sure they know that copying, pasting, maybe spinning an article written by another is not "Original Content." Plagerism is...
by Lionrhod16 months ago
So over the past few weeks I've been wanting to re-publish some of my old articles.Knowing that Google has a prob with duplicate pages I start looking up my articles on the web, and crud! My articles are ALL over the...
by Mark Knowles7 years ago
I am not going to drag up the recent massive plagiarism activity again, but - as you know Maddie - I have found that quite a lot of my hubs have been de-indexed and my traffic here is dropping despite publishing new...
by Caren White4 years ago
I just received an email from Hub pages accusing me of plagiarism. They have unpublished one of my hubs. That hub is entirely my own work based on my experience as a Master Gardener. I also work in a...
by akeejaho9 years ago
Well, this has got to be a first. I signed into HubPages because I needed to prove to myself that I could attract readers. I needed to prove this to myself. I have a few that read my things, and it...
by akeejaho8 years ago
I am kinda flattered, but mad as a wet hornet. Has anyone here ever heard of barryrutherford? Well, compare his Hub, Bipolar,more on this subject, and So, whats wrong with being bipolar? I mean, good...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.