So when I hop, I often find hubs that are:
* Spun or poorly translated
* Overly Promotional
* Low Quality
* Deceptive or miscategorized
I have been just flagging them once, and noting in the comments that there's also a good case for the others.
My question is this: Should I continue as I have been, or should I start flagging the bad hubs multiple times if they're bad in multiple ways?
My suggestion is this: might there be a way to code the flag feature so that hoppers can "check all that apply?" Would this be helpful to the staff or make life harder? I ask as someone ignorant of both the code involved and the back-end process followed when a hub gets flagged.
Jeff, all flagging does is bring the Hub to the attention of a moderator. Telling the moderator why you flagged the Hub gives them a clue - but if the Hub truly needs flagging, it will be bleeding obvious to the moderator what the problem is, without you making any comment at all!
So I would definitely say - flag only once. Personally I would tick the most obvious transgression and not worry too much about commenting - they only have to break one rule to get unpubbed.
I'm sure flagging it once and adding a comment helps. I usually take a look at the profile to see if it's a pattern and flag the profile if necessary. But I don't use the hopper, I use the latest hubs feed.
If it's not obvious, I don't flag it.
Marisa is correct. You can add a comment that "also deceptive, etc." - the moderators do read the comments - but you only need to flag a Hub once to have a moderator have a look.
Jason - is there any guidance or clarification forthcoming on the website url titled pages? Or the website "review" or website "login" styles?
Yes - if the title is deceptive, meaning it doesn't describe what the Hub actually is, then it should be flagged as "Deceptive Title."
Website "reviews" are OK if that's what they are; website "login" is, in most cases, not.
by Mikeydoes6 years ago
In light of the Google algo change, it is now obvious and confirmed that hub-hopping is VERY important. I feel that if you publish here, you should hub hop when you can. As it should hopefully increase our revenue and...
by SmartAndFun4 years ago
I really don't like the "new" hopper and have not bothered to hop hubs since it came out several months ago. In the spirit of helping to clear up the backlog, however, I gave it another shot tonight.The...
by cosette6 years ago
Dear HubTeam:I know there have been a few forum threads about this topic, but hear me out please. By the way, this thread refers to the rating down of hubs, not flagging. I have no problem with the flagging feature and...
by Maddie Ruud5 years ago
I'm pleased to announce that the new and improved flagging reasons that I've alluded to recently have finally arrived. We have broken down some of the umbrella categories like "Substandard" into more...
by nell796 years ago
I'm just wondering as a newbie here (four weeks yesterday, if my math is right ) if it's common practice for hubbers to write hubs with the intent of ridiculing or tearing apart other hubbers? I've recently experienced...
by Melanie4 years ago
I prefer the old way to flag a hub (I don't remember when you changed it.)Back in the day the different "reasons for flagging" used to really stand out (and I could easily remember which reasons were in which...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.