Not quite time to get excited yet and the figures are still well down from what they were before the two slaps. But let's hope that it's the beginning of a longer upward trend, rather than just a blip.
The fluctuating stats for one hubber are almost meaningless, but I did notice that my viewing figures, which normally dip drastically at the weekend, actually went up this past weekend.
It is a long way back but any kind of start is certainly welcome. I was shocked when I looked at Quantcast a week ago. If I had any shares in the site I would have sold them.
Just as an afterthought, it looks like Hubpages has caught up with Squidoo.
That first panda slap literally sent the traffic over a cliff! Then the second one rubbed salt into the wound (sorry about the mixed metaphors). It's difficult to believe that a company with HubPages' experience won't be able to pull back some, if not all of its lost traffic, and hopefully that's begun to happen. Fingers crossed.
Here's the 2 sites Quantcast results side by side for comparison.
Hubpages (all time)
Squidoo (all time)
The graphs above have different scales so are a little misleading.
If you look at just the last weeks graphs you can see that Hubpages and Squidoo had roughly equal numbers of visitors over the last few days. If you look at page views, Hubpages has been noticeably ahead.
This could change of course, but I am hoping it doesn't.
It looks that a bit of bright light at the end of the tunnel. Hopefully all the hard work that Hub-hoppers and HP staff have been doing to clean the site up is starting to payoff.
I have noticed some of most visited hubs reviving a little.
I have faith that HubPages will recover.
The HubPages team has been hard at work trying to resolve the stressful smack we got from the big "G" panda. It's nice to know that it may be starting to spring back some. When it's all said and done, I have to believe HP will be awesome and on the top once again! Thanks for the visual aides Izzy, awesome!
Looking at the latest version of the graph for HP, it's now looking like it was just a week long blip. Sigh.
Three straight weeks of higher figures would be needed to show a consistent upward trend for the whole site, I reckon.
Still testing the lows... I suppose I'd better write another article. Another 20 views will surely help.
Perhaps we are stabilizing, but the real test will be now until Christmas.
I sincerely hope that things turnaround.
Yes Paul, we should not expect for some magic to happen but we should be sure enough that Hubpages will climb back to its previous place after a few months. It will obviously take time for a site like HP that had been hit so severely. Every black cloud has a silver lining and we have already got a hint of that around 12 days back from today. Best of luck to everyone.
Here's the last 3 months for HP by week:
Not sure how anyone can construe that as being any kind of "upturn." Matter of fact, I believe they've sunk to a new low.
Here's a comparison of the past 6 months for HP and Squidoo -- HP in blue, Squidoo in green. If you look at the numbers, HP is down over last month and last year, while Squidoo is showing positive growth.
Look at the date of my original post, Irohner, it was two weeks ago and it was in specific reference to the week preceding where there was a 20% pick up in traffic. Mine and others comments refer to that specific week.
It turned out to be a week long blip, as I pointed out a few days ago.
Paul - I was responding to Soni's post from two hours ago where he said that HP will "climb back to its previous place after a few months."
Wow, that's depressing... but kind of unsurprising to me personally, given my current traffic levels.
Tough to analyze fairly. I'm guessing before any upturn can be detected, HP will have to make up for a lot of lost revenue due to unpublished hubs. So, it would seem to me that HP is suffering from a double whammy right now: Panda, as well as fewer money-making published articles.
I wonder how much the removal of thousands of hubs from the high-performing spammers with the website "review" hubs have impacted this. There were at least 5,000 hubs removed as a few of the most egregious ones had their accounts banned or all their hubs removed.
Here is the link:
The smart ones added the word "review" or "information" to the titles to circumvent policy, but the quality of the hubs themselves are subpar (IMHO).
These guys had millions of views each, so that had to have hurt...
by Dr. John Anderson2 years ago
The 3 month Quantcast data for HP - US Pageviews is shown below. Looks like there has been an average 10% loss of 'Quota', (average traffic) since the start if the year. There is a significant loss in mobile traffic...
by topclass3 years ago
Many good quality pages are Idled (become unfeatured) via ‘Analysis of the how engaged readers are with a Hub over an extended period of time’ – essentially because they get low traffic.It appears that...
by Dr. John Anderson3 years ago
The recent Panda update produced a typical change in traffic for HP shown below.I have often wondered why the change is so immediate and consistent. As shown in the image below it would suggest that the change is not...
by Person of Interest3 years ago
I just compared the 3-month, Quantcast charts for HP and Squidoo. Based on trends, HP is now your better bet! I kid you not. Although Google is probably still not thrilled with all writing sites in general, I believe...
by Paul Goodman5 years ago
Is it just me or are HP no longer allowing their figures to be displayed by Quantcast? If that is the case then I am disappointed, especially after a member of HP staff made a specific point recently on the forums...
by Writer Fox2 years ago
If you do, how is search traffic to your articles there? Has there been a recent change from the Google Panda or Penguin updates? Would you recommend this site to other writers?
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.