I was reading the Hubpages " in the news" section, and spotted a familiar post that stated that they had loosened the " death grip" on us writers, from Panda.
However, it also stated that the changes would be fabulous for great writers, and detrimental for "weak" writers.
What I would like to know is what exactly is a "weak" writer, and by who's standards are they weak?
Oh, boy. I just saw that you signed up right about when the big "Panda slap" took place. I can't speak for either HP or Google; but for the most part, I think what is meant is that good writers will benefit versus people who don't bother trying to write something decent (by doing things like aiming for grammar grammar and spelling, trying to offer the reader something unique, useful, informative and/or entertaining). In other words, come up with something "decent". People who don't use the English language well, don't bother with aiming for good grammar and spelling, and just slap up something with a bunch of keywords and other SEO efforts put in but without anything particularly useful, unique, or informative - "weak writers". They're not looking for Shakespeare - just decent writing that someone puts some effort and care into.
"Who's standards": Since Panda it's very much been Google who has set those standards, and their list of guidelines/standards is on their site (as well as a lot of other places online). (I went to see if I could find the latest Google "guidelines", but I can't find them right this minute. )
In any case, with six months of Hubs (and "the Panda slap") out of the way, you're starting your next six months at a good time on here.
It's not something to get upset about. You might want to think in terms of online writing. A weak writer is someone who is unsuccessful, because they produce unoriginal hubs covering topic that have been covered a million times online. Or they may fail to understand the workings of search engines and use generic terms as keywords.
Oh no, I feel like that might be me in terms of the unoriginal stuff. But more recently, I can't remember, where but some forum or other. Google seemed to place the emphasis on where a searcher might feel confident on giving their credit card details etc.
Haunty. I am not upset my friend, but thank you for your worry over me. I merely thought it would be a good chatting point, as there are so many standards for different writing platforms.
Lisa, that was exactlt the sort of answer I was hoping to read. I am hoping the next 6 months will not only be lucrative but that I will grow significantly. As I have already promised my husband that I am working for free now, for future gain, and not for 20 pence a day. 8-)
Hollie, we can but learn so do not worry.x
Judging strength or weakness in writing is a tricky thing that can't be pinned down to just one or two simple things, and judging it in an online setting turns out to be even more difficult.
Web writers who are strong tend to produce or perform averagely to above averagely when judged on a wide variety of characteristics that all go into making successful web content. Conversely, weak writers miss multiple elements in that strange and ever-changing formula.
I think the term "weak writer" is rude personally, but I suppose there's a rating system constructed by website owners, managers, etc. I believe if you're writing from your heart, you're already a successful writer but again, if you're trying to be financially successful, there may be different rules:(
by JSParker5 years ago
I think HubPages is just a terrific opportunity for writers to write and make connections within the HubPages community. However, I am concerned about the quality of some of the hubs I see. Even if the...
by Eric Dierker3 years ago
There are actually some here that want more restrictions on what who can publish here!! They really want to hold back new artists and writers.Well excuse me Hitler's book burning Germany but no thank you. I grew...
by TIMETRAVELER22 years ago
I've been online for almost 4 years, 2 1/2 of which have been spent writing for HP. There are a few thoughts I would like to share with my fellow writers that I feel might be helpful to them.First, we should never...
by FaisalKhan21214 years ago
I say thank you Panda for helping to restore quality content to search engine results. Hubpages definitely has gotten better-- the spam is gone and the cream is rising to the top. Also, I'm making more money...
by sin_min5 years ago
Is their a to go person for editing or reviews of books?
by Phyllis Doyle Burns3 years ago
I believe HubPages would greatly benefit from implementing a stronger, more thorough training period for new members. I have been writing for the internet for over seven years now. I know that may not seem long to some...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.