A select group of Hubbers (perhaps chosen by their Peers, or the Hubpages Elite) should have a little more power than the rest of us. When flagging it can take a day or two (due to the backlog) for an entry or a 'user' to be removed.
These 'special' users should be able to 'temporarily' remove content immediately pending review - as an example, there's a spammer on the forums - this type of entry is obviously going to be removed, so therefore some Hubber should be able to remove it now!!!!
Great SimeyC. You just said what I had in my mind for a long time. Let's see if HubPages takes this suggestion seriously, or not. To beat sockpuppets, or spammers, or psychopaths - we need people, and not a new software.
One thing- those people must be chosen very wisely. I have seen online moderators being just egoists, and not rational; and I have seen content and people being banned, just because they went over the head of the moderator. Fools do not like smart people. This is a proven psychology. Having no moderator is often better than having a bad moderator.
I do not know how those people will be selected! Tough job...
Well you have something like a three strike rule - three 'obviously' wrong 'flags' and they no longer have the privelege of having the 'power'....
I guess it's going to be very difficult to really implement something like this as it is going to be impossible to satisfy everyone with the choices.
Take out the 'obviously', please. If these special people are only going to shut down obviously wrong posts, then there should be mistakes at all. Anything just slightly out of line should simply be flagged for moderators.
Three 'flags' on something that shouldn't be flagged at all and it's obvious that the 'flagger' doesn't understand their task.
True!!! But the problem trying to get 'more power' to the people, is that there will always be someone who says 'Why did you pick that person?, they are biased'.
Perhaps have these people as 'anonymous'? Perhaps there are already some Hub-Elite that DO have the power....
I'm just trying to find a way of removing the junk quickly and efficiently - there are only so many moderators to go around and it can take a while to remove garbage...
I like this three strike rule - that will force them to think before banning 'anyone' or 'anything'. Clever thought!
I feel a great many members of this website will love when they find that they are secured in their psychology - that is - no one will hurt them in the forums. I can quote too many people who said just what we are talking here. It's not about satisfaction - it's about detection - and there is a place where everyone can see the Objectivity of the matter.
We just need moderators who can make that see.
You know HP proposed the same thing months and months back, they may even have implemented it. It would be hard to tell as there would be no reason to tell anyone about it.
Somewhere I picked up the idea that if your flags are consistently on posts that end up being moderated then your flags will receive quicker attention than those from someone that flags things that turn out to be all right.
I couldn't tell you where I got that, and it may not have any truth at all. Or it could be what you are talking about.
Cool - guess I missed that one! I hope it is in place!!!
@sunforged- You know HP proposed the same thing months and months back, they may even have implemented it.
What made HubPages not implement that? ...I am curious
And, what makes you think HP hasn't implemented, just not told anyone or who has the power to do so.
I would like to know a bit about their nomination-process...that bears psychological responsibility
you see, even the user may not know they "have the power" ... that would be the best way, wouldnt it?
can somebody tell me why is eror 404 on my screen when I trying to open my page from googlr search
by sunforged5 years ago
When one writes at "real" or traditional publications they work with editors.The qualifications to be an editor are pretty straightforward.The last 3 months of experience with moderation staff really begs the...
by Debra Allen4 years ago
Cagsil got banned for 7 days for providing help to new members. Well he complained about is as he should have and now he is banned for 3 months. Where in the TOS does it state that we are not permitted to...
by Rob Welsh4 years ago
I really - totally object to having my efforts to successfully produce high quality hubs, images and words, undermined by an anonymous and questionably qualified moderator, whom I would challenge to take the time to...
by Bronson_Hub5 years ago
Here's the hub in question, a humor piece on Valentine's day in the answer section: <snipped link>A moderator looking through the hubs personally stopped by mine, and without rhyme or reason, disabled...
by Julaha7 years ago
I think it should.Here is why.It will improve the quality of the HubPages. Currently, because Hubbing is allowed only in English, many people who are not comfortable with English are forced to write in English. This...
by qwark6 years ago
He is conspicuous because of his absence.He's a great writer.I miss his anti-religion banter!
Copyright © 2016 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.