I have a website <link snipped> which I started recently and have been slowly building it up with content. BTW, I love the show (hence why I created the site). Anway, someone recently commented on one of my posts with an offer to increase traffic through what looks like mainly back links:
It looks legit enough but I'm not too fond of the $40+ monthly fee.
Has anyone tried this service (or type of service)?
P.S.: This is not a sneaky way of promoting a service I own (or a friend owns). I know very about SEO. However, I will say that I am shamelessly plugging my sharktank site, either rightly or wrongly on this thread.
There are plenty of similar services out there. I went through a phase of researching them (most of them offer a free trial period). I tried a lot, and rarely even lasted the trial period!
The way they work is this. The service maintains a large network of blogs. You then write (or spin) blog posts to be posted on those blogs, containing links to your website.
As you probably know, backlinks are important to improve your ranking in the search engines. But there's no value in backlinks from poor quality sites - and on most of these services, the sites are very poor quality. Worse, Google is now actively seeking out these networks and de-indexing them - which means the service could go out of business at any time, and all your work will be wasted.
So the only networks worth joining are private networks which set very high standards for their blogs. They're hard to find now, because they don't want Google to find them - and they cost a lot more than $40 a month because they're so scarce. Out of the league of most of us!
I wouldn't touch it if it were free. In fact, if they paid me for it, I wouldn't go near it.
Try reading what is happening with Google Panda and Penguin regarding pointless spam back links.
About the best result you can hope for from this crap is that you won't get a Google penalty.
Just my opinion.
IF these people were so bloody successful, why don't they back-link their own content and make a fortune? Because it is all a giant con.
Still. That's just my opinion. There is a LOT of information about back linking out there on SEO forums. Google just changed the game.
Taking part in paid backling as a linker or linkee risk incurring Googlewrath.
I was a linker and got my PR3 blogslapped to 0 then 1, then TWO YEARS later I got it back to 3.
by GlendaGoodWitch2 years ago
Is there a way to restore our traffic after this Panda update?
by Marisa Wright2 years ago
I am always surprised that guest blogging is never discussed on HubPages. We all know it's important to have backlinks pointing to our Hubs and websites. We also know that Google is working hard to...
by Manthram3 years ago
Back-links are the main aspect of off-page SEO. There are several ways to get back-links. Social media, like posting your hubs to Facebook and Twitter, forum posting, and blog commenting are the most common. Just stay...
by wytegarillaz6 years ago
Has anyone paid for these backlinks at all and had benefits from them ?I keep seeing the advert so thought I would ask.Thanks
by Dr. John Anderson8 months ago
"John Mueller said that external links, links on your web site that point to outside web sites (or outbound links) are not a ranking signal. Just to be clear, links are a ranking factor - but you linking out to...
by lady luck8 years ago
Hey all....Is it worth it (traffic wise/ income wise) to put links to major sites in hubs? Like if you said, I read this article in Vouge (and made the word vouge a link), would that reap any benefits?Also....how would...
Copyright © 2016 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.