and more beavers?I think it would because their would be more dams and less animals with long necks and those creepy black tongues.*Please note that no Giraffes would be terminated... they would be peacefully converted to beaverism.So what do you think the world could do with less of and replaced with more of?
I'd go for fewer prisons and more zoos.Oh, wait, in so many ways they're the same...
Maybe we should put the more hardened criminals in the zoos with some of the most dangerous animals and free up space in the real prisons for lessor offenders.
That doesn't seem fair to the dangerous animals. They're only violent by instinct, not by choice. I say fewer hippos (they're mean!) and more Kodiak bears.
Doesn't seem fair to the dangerous animals? It's completely fair to feed them isn't it?
Didn't consider that....helluva plan, Cags.
I like it
It sounded good Melissa.
I was going to say that the world would be better off without Nuclear Weapons, but since you want to talk about animals, I would have to say we need more Humpback Whales and less Killer Sharks.
We could just train beavers to eat giraffes. Problem solved.
Copyright © 2016 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.