Angola -- Independence, Civil War, and Today
One of the major stages where the Cold War played out, Angola has remained war-torn into the 21st Century. The many factions, sides, and supporters get confusing very quickly. Here is an outline of major events, people, and issues -- in normal, human language, no crazy academic talk here -- to help you get a basic understanding of what has been going on.
Events Leading up to Revolution
- Portuguese moved into Angola while looking for routes to India and China
- Many of the soldiers, traders, and settlers took Angolan wives, creating a race of Afro-Portuguese. Resulting race became the prominent class in Angola
- Afro-Portuguese defended middle-man position by balancing natives and Europeans.
- Portuguese and the natives started a huge slave trade within Angola. More than 12 million forcibly shipped to America (Angolans selling their own people)
- Late 19th century, Afro-Portuguese threatened by presence of British in their interior
- Portugal exiled the poor Portuguese to Angola and gave them the good jobs and the money. As a result, less than 40% of Angolans had any income
Some Direct Reasons for War
- End Cuban military presence in Angola, fix tension between Cubans and Angolans.
- To keep the oil flow and income going through Angola.
- To give Angola its independence from Portugal.
Important Events in the Revolution
- Africa split up by Europe, Angola given to Portugal. Angolans worked to fight Portugal’s presence in 1880s to 1970.
- February 1961 members of MPLA, led by Antonio Neto, attacked Sao Paulo fortress and police headquarters in Luanda (the key port city in Angola).
- At the same time, series of attacks in northern Angola against Portuguese coffee growers. Led by the organization UPNA.
- 1960s -1974: Three main movements (MPLA, UNITA, FNLA) fought against Portuguese and each other with no clear results.
- In 1974 a rebellion against President Getano brought General Spinola into power.
- 1975 power shifted from conservative Spinola to younger, more left-oriented, USSR-educated officers (open doors for Angolan independence).
Jonas Malheiro Savimbi
- Born 1934, attended school in Angola, continued education in Europe.
- Joined the UPA/FNLA, fought for liberation from Portugal
- Signed a UN peace agreement to be presidential candidate in elections
- Rejected results of elections, reunited UNITA, and resumed civil war
- Supported heavily by the United States, but were some big problems when it came to diamond trade due to his corruption.
Role of the USA and USSR
- Neither of them started revolution; already problems in Angola long before Cold War
- US and USSR fueled problems in Angola: took sides and gave aid
- The Soviet Union:
o Backed the MPLA
o Had educated all Angolans of higher education, thus instilling Soviet ideas
- The United States:
o Used CIA to support National Front for the Liberation of Angola (FNLA)
o Several hundred million dollars overall
o Ultimately of no use to well-being of Angolans
o Congress passed act to ban aid to Angola (expired in 1986)
- First War with UNITA
o May 1991
o Signed deal promising to end hostilities
o Promised ceasefire within a month, demobilize forces
o Planned UN-monitored election to stabilize government
o But the time constraints were too strict, not enough time for total ceasefire
o Fighting continued
- Second War with UNITA
o November 1994
o More relaxed/flexible negotiations, no rushing this time
o UN gave $1 billion and several thousand peacekeepers
o UNITA disbanded into a political party (no longer military force)
o Fighting continued despite all these attempts
o Angolan forces wanted a form of socialism
o Push those ideas back to their roots: USSR
- Unsuccessful, no one “won”
o Fighting has continued
o Neither US nor USSR fully implemented/endorsed its ideology
o Angolans lost people, resources, etc, never gained freedom
You can write a "hub" like this and make money from the advertisements! Just join the HubPages community (it only takes a few seconds), and start writing about whatever moves you. It's that simple!
Justified American Intervention?
- Traditionalist: Yes
o Soviets should have no influence in Africa
o Needed to get their ideas away from impressionable people
o Concerned for interests of America’s future security
o Needed to protect Angolans from being subjected to communism
- Revisionist: No
o US mixed up in irrelevant affairs
o Just trying to “beat” USSR in endorsing ideology
o No real care for the people of Angola or their well-being
More by this Author
A look at the pros and cons, the laws, and the ethics of cosmetic modification in dogs.
From silent to soundtrack, follow the story of how music became an integral and significant part of our film experience.
There's a serious debate as to whether the Prius is good or bad for the environment. How can this be; shouldn't it be obvious one way or the other? Read to see the complex issues on both sides.