Foreign Laws in US Courtrooms
Judges see it more often than not. Foreign law influencing their own discretion and outcome, Usually, these cases are in the Family law arena-divorces and child custody issues where a US Court was influenced by a foreign court's decision. While most agree that a foreign court's decision has no binding impact on a US court, Judges admit it does impact and influence their final ruling at times.
Many states have now banned the use of Sharia Law and other foreign laws. Yet, on appeal, the Federal court cited it being unconstitutional because it targeted a specific religion-Islam and granted a temporary injunction. Of course, the American Muslims are irate about this because they are a target-well, if they are indeed practicing Sharia Law, I guess we do have a problem then. It should not be allowed. Period. There have been about a dozen cases where US judges had to considered a foreign court's ruling originating in Islamic law or traditions before making a ruling based on US law. The question is why, at all, consider what a foreign court ruled, especially when Islam tends to be biased towards men in most aspects from a Western perspective. I mean, American court rulings are not considered in their courts whatsoever. In one 1996 child custody case in Maryland, the appellate court ruled based upon a Pakistani court order that a 12 yr. old girl should go to the father, who live in Pakistan, rather than the mother, who lived in the US. The US ruling cited the influence of Hazanit, which gives the traditional preference of child custody to the father and typically used in Muslim countries. Hazanit favors the children staying in Islamic societies rather than in non-Islamic ones. The dissenting judge questioned about the fundamental rights of the mother under American law and why the other judges favored a foreign law. In 2009, another case, this time in New Jersey between a Moroccan couple. The woman was sexually assaulted by her husband. She sought a restraining order against him. The court refused basing it on the foreign law and custom under Islam that the man has a right to nonconsensual sex with his wife and he had no criminal intent because it was his belief. On appeal, in 2010, after more trauma had been inflicted on the woman, the Court reversed the trial court decision and issued the restraining order citing American law.
America is getting to be a little too mixed up with its melting pot. Yes, having people come here from across the world is fine and some customs had variety to America and are wonderful, but the law in America really must be that-American. Just as the language should be English. Mixing foreign law with American law is just going to produce chaos. So far, 21 states are considering have statutes forbidding any foreign law influence in a judge's decision.
More by this Author
Anyone who was between 8 and 20 yrs. in 1965 and was cognizant of the world around them knows instinctively 1964-1965 was a turning point. It set the stage for how the world be in the USA. Trying to convey this to those...
Drumbeat, at least in theory, had been planned as far back as 1897. Germany had always been fascinated with attacking America, a land insulated and buffered by two oceans. There was a desire to “break” this...
There are intentional fake news items to sway people, which were discovered in the 2016 presidential election. Then, there are stories with maybe unintentional consequences of being news.