From Garbage Dumps to Sanitary Landfills: An Overview of Waste Management Solutions

Even pre-historic man had to figure out what to do with its garbage. Few people, it seems, have ever wanted to accumulate trash in their houses. Up until recently, waste management solutions have included simply dumping trash out on the street, dumping it somewhere out of town, burying it, dumping it in a lake or river, or perhaps burning it.

The trash dump outside of ancient Jerusalem was perpetually on fire. It is not clear to me whether the fire was deliberately set and tended or whether it erupted from spontaneous combustion. In either case, the dump was named gehenna, which became one of the names for hell in the New Testament.

Trash dumps with or without fire must have been dangerous and unpleasant places. But they served the purpose adequately as long as most people lived in the country side and cities were not very large. Even throwing refuse in the streets must not have seemed too bad as long as pigs, dogs, vultures, and other free-roaming scavengers ate it. New Amsterdam forbade the practice in 1657, its successor city New York had to outlaw it again two hundred years later.


As cities became larger, and especially as the human race learned more about sanitation and disease, traditional waste management solutions became inadequate. During the Industrial Revolution, manufacturers began to add tremendously to the waste stream, and therefore to the problems of waste management. The new garbage included not only byproducts of the manufacturing process, but new products like metal beer bottle caps or disposable razor blades.

In the nineteenth century, municipal governments took over the responsibility for waste management solutions. Among new ideas, the first municipal incinerator in the United States opened in 1885. Twenty five years later, 180 other incinerators had been built, but 102 of them had already been abandoned. Most were inadequately built or poorly run, and in any case much more expensive than simply dumping trash.

By 1900, many cities had begun to collect and dispose of waste and to record how much they collected. Between food waste, dry rubbish, and ash from burning coal or wood, the average American generated 1,400 pounds of trash annually. Meanwhile, manufacturers continued to add new disposable packaging, advertising (including bulky catalogs), and products (such as paper cups).

An open dump
An open dump

In the 1920s, it seemed a good idea to "reclaim" wetlands by filling them in with dirt, garbage, and ash. Of course, rivers still served as a convenient place to dump trash, too--all the more so after the invention of the garbage disposal. Not for the first time in history, waste management solutions simply created other problems.

After the Second World War, marketers deliberately sought to make consumers (especially women) dissatisfied with whatever they already had. Advertising sought to induce them to dispose of possessions that were not yet completely worn out. Marketers also began to target children, counting on their determination to have their own way with their parents. Raising consumer spending in this way also raised the amount of trash that needed disposal.

The earliest municipal trash collections had required the separation of food waste from solid trash, but in 1960, Sam Yorty became mayor of Los Angeles, running on a platform to end that inconvenience. Before long, mingling compostable garbage with at least partly recyclable solid waste into one unmanageable mishmash became the national norm. To this day, Yorty's accomplishment hinders such waste management solutions as recycling.

At about the same time, the age old garbage dump began to evolve into the sanitary landfill. To combat noxious odors and proliferation of rodents at the dumps, the American Society of Civil engineers recommended compacting refuse and covering it with a layer of soil ever day.

The federal government became involved with waste management for the first time with the passage of the Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1965. Other federal environmental acts, including the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and the establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency soon followed. Following the first Earth Day on April 22, 1970, many Americans started looking for waste management solutions as eagerly as manufacturers had been adding to the problems.

Ironically, just a decade after Yorty's push to eliminate separating garbage, other jurisdictions began to encourage recycling. Oregon passed the first of several bottle bills in 1971. By offering cash for glass, aluminum, and plastic containers, it eliminated about 7% of its trash from the waste stream--a mere fraction of what could have been removed.

Sanitary landfill
Sanitary landfill

Turning old dumps into sanitary landfills actually created new problems. When it rained on old dumps, the runoff made it into rivers and streams, polluting surface water. Daily layers of dirt on composted trash may have seemed to solve that problem.

Unfortunately, instead of running off, rainwater soaked into the landfill. There, it combined with chemicals (often including hazardous wastes) to create leachate. Leachate can pollute ground water.

Formerly, scientists assumed that ground water was free from contamination. In theory, the ground filters out pollutants, so by the time even contaminated rainwater reached an underground aquifer, it would be clean.

As it turns out, landfill leachate concentrates contaminants so much that, unless the water table is very deep, the ground cannot absorb them before they reach aquifers. And aquifers provide drinking water for any place that relies on wells. The landfill, then, has merely added another waste management problem that needs solutions.

Building modern landfills entails installing some kind of impermeable lining, collecting leachate, and treating it before returning it to the environment. The processes of compacting, installing liners, and collecting and treating leachate makes sanitary landfills much more expensive to operate than the older trash dumps. They also require, but do not necessarily get, expensive maintenance long after they stop accepting new trash.

Today, Americans on the average produce 1,600 pounds of trash every year. If that seems a modest increase over a century, consider that in 1900, coal or wood ash from cooking and heating comprised the largest portion of household waste.

Much more than half of today's trash could be recycled, but 80% of it winds up in landfills. Can we expect new technology to provide more workable waste management solutions? Or will we have to work to reduce the amount of waste we produce in the first place?

More by this Author


9 comments

Gareth Edwards 6 years ago

Interesting article. I work within a consultancy group operating in Bulgaria, and we have been commissioned by several bodies to look at waste management solutions, both general and the issues of neutralising toxic waste from incineration and burning. Having never been involved in this area, it became apparent very quickly that waste ia a MASSIVE issue, and quite frightening at times, however if there is hope it is in some of the technologies that offer simple solutions, that if taken up by authorities would put a great dent in the problems of waste.


allpurposeguru profile image

allpurposeguru 6 years ago from North Carolina Author

Yes, Gareth, it is massive, and has been for a long time. I like to think of garbage as an infinitely renewable resource that can potentially help our equally massive energy issues. I don't claim any expertise in the area, but I'm reading and learning. I just blogged at http://www.allpurposeguru.com/2010/05/cost-of-conv... but some time in the next month I expect to write another hub.


Rae 6 years ago

Very informative article.


PegCole17 profile image

PegCole17 6 years ago from Dallas, Texas

Hello allpurpose,

Your article was informative and very readable. I learned several new things from this hub:the fires outside Jerusalem; that was interesting. And the reminder that we baby boomers created the disposable society.

"After the Second World War, marketers deliberately sought to make consumers (especially women) dissatisfied with whatever they already had. Advertising sought to induce them to dispose of possessions that were not yet completely worn out."

I remember returning glass soda bottles for refunds in the early 60s. Then along came canned sodas in vending machines. There was an immediately change in the trash can that was placed beside the new canned drink machine; it was often overflowing with cans. Just the beginning of waste mis-management and disposable items.


allpurposeguru profile image

allpurposeguru 6 years ago from North Carolina Author

Thanks, Rae and Peg. If enough of us boomers remember what frugal living used to be like, and dislike what wastefulness has done to us, maybe we can lead the way back by example. I lose track of where I've written particular comments, but the current "great recession" could ultimately have a good effect on our country if it makes people conscious of the cost of waste and try frugality again. That doesn't necessarily mean going back to glass bottles and deposits, but it does require recycling the cans--and clamoring for fountain drinks or coffee in recyclable cups instead of all that styrofoam out there.


Nancy Craft 5 years ago

Please go to my page on facebook, Thoughtful About Rubbish, and post on the wall to spread awareness. Please. The apathy in my part of the USA is huge.


allpurposeguru profile image

allpurposeguru 5 years ago from North Carolina Author

I like your page, Nancy, and I did leave a comment. I also noticed this post there. Thank you. All of us who care need to do what we can do to get the word out that taking care of the environment doesn't have to be a huge or expensive sacrifice for anyone so long as enough people become mindful of opportunities--and the necessity--of taking multiple small steps.


sage of tralee profile image

sage of tralee 5 years ago

We have a problem with a garbage dump, euphemistically called a landfill, here in Yamhill County Oregon, owned by Waste Management, Inc.

The bottom three pods are leaking into the South Yamhill River, and Waste Management wants to expand the dump into the surrounding farmlands which have Class 1 soils. this expansion, will be also down into the floodplain which floods every winter.

Our Commissioners are too corrupt and cowardly to stop them. The Land use Advisory Board has already ruled against this action, but the Commissioner and WM are intent on making it happen.

We have proposed a 0-energy/0-emissions hybrid enzymatic-plasma-arc trash-to-fuel plant which will consume the dump, still take in new trash in real time, and yield billions of dollars and hundreds of jobs for this county. Nothing doing. WM and the Commissioners have outright refused.

See more information and the history of the struggle here at http://www.wastenotofyamhillcounty.org/

Yr. Obed Scrivener

Kathleen


allpurposeguru profile image

allpurposeguru 5 years ago from North Carolina Author

Kathleen--Ouch! Keep plugging. Maybe you can elect new commissioners next time around--not that it will be easy, but something to work hard on and make common cause with groups interested in other green causes. Good luck.

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working