A Beginners Introduction Guide to Kierkegaard

The man himself
The man himself

"I have been to the brink of oblivion and I remember nothing more than a fermented desire to remember everything" --Waking Life

The Scientist and The Storyteller Metaphor and Language

In this article I will endeavor to outline Sǿren Kierkegaard for beginners. This article is meant to serve as an introduction and is by no means an exhaustive analysis of the writer, but hopefully you will have an understanding of the basics and a good direction for further reading.

Kierkegaard is my favorite philosopher because after reading his books I was able to reconcile religion or rather theology with philosophy. Some people prefer an analytic approach to philosophy, and although I have found much of this thinking very helpful it is a bit stuffy, who wants to decode symbolic logic all day? I am more interested in the use of metaphor and the telling of stories. Science creates a theory and assumes it as an end all answer until an anomaly arrives, for instance the unexplainable wobble in Neptune’s orbit is what lead to the discovery of Pluto. The theory was reworked to include the new planet, or whatever they decided it is now. With storytelling there is only a glimpse of the truth and the story never ends, and the words of a very wise professor have always stuck with me, “We are the stories we tell”.

Kierkegaard was able to help me know more about the intricacies of that human emotion we call love and the virtue called grace. He liked to tell stories and would never use his own name, rather pen names that reflected some meaning of the story. He had very Christian motivations and successfully masked them in his presentation, he only directly mentions Christian words and concepts when he writes under his own name in non-philosophical works. The fact that he is my favorite philosopher may appear odd then considering I practice Judaism. It shouldn’t matter that Aslan is a metaphor for Jesus, C.S. Lewis wrote some damn good stories. Plus many devout Christians like Kierkegaard, Lewis, and Tolkien bring the theology discussion to a point where a Jewish background has a useful concept map to work from that may actually be more adaptable than traditional Christian thinking.

Science uses terms that in philosophy of language are referred to as extensional. This means it is what is called referentially transparent. Any word that means the same thing may be substituted without changing the truth value. For instance, assuming Spiderman is a real person in the world I might say, “Peter Parker is a photographer.” or “Peter Parker can shoot webs from his wrists.” Regardless of if I use ‘Spiderman’ instead of ‘Peter Parker’ as the referential to the real entity the statement will not change in whether or not it is true or false. Then there is intentional language that is referentially opaque, if I were to say, “Harry Osborne believes Peter Parker is a great guy” and then were to replace Peter Parker with Spiderman as the referent, the statement would change from true to false. This inability to change the referent to something that means the same thing is noted by the presence of an intentional verb or hidden intentionality. In other words, to describe the sensation of pain is not scientific but requires a metaphor because the concept of ‘pain’ is inherently subjective in its nature and implies hidden intentionality. Since pain is very real to a lot of people, understanding it and stepping outside of the thesis of extensionality is an important endeavor as long as neuroscience, behaviorism and cognitive behaviorism cannot yet scientifically define it in extensional terms.

With that being said Kierkegaard and all philosophers who use metaphor to make their point get at things Science never can. The claim that the boiling point of water is 100 degrees Celsius is regarded as either true or false whereas a good metaphor is known to be literally false. “Las Vegas is Sodom” is only ever partially true, obviously the cities are not the same, one existed in Abrahamic times and the other is around today. The statement still means something and to use a term from President Bush, in metaphor we are getting at the truthiness of given claims. Confucius say, “Are you a man dreaming you are a butterfly or a butterfly dreaming you are a man?”

Rotation of Crops

Normally the phrase goes, ‘sickness unto health’ but in true existential fashion the title of Kierkegaard’s book is Sickness Unto Death. A lot of people at first glance see the existentialists as dark thinkers falling into the depths of despair. This may be true at times but to me it is the most inspirational kind of philosophy out there. In example one of my favorite Nietzsche quotes is, “The higher you soar the smaller you appear to those who cannot fly.” But back into the darkness, what is the ‘sickness’ of the human condition? Kierkegaard believed it was boredom. "Boredom is the root of all evil; the despairing refusal to be oneself."

It is this lack of fulfillment and our own wanton distraction that causes suffering in this world. The old proverb says that ‘the rich man is the one who is content with what he has’ and in Buddhist philosophy suffering is described as ‘the want not to suffer’ and even in Western Civilization the Roman Emperor, Marcus Aurelius, said as much in so many words. There is one proven way to not be bored and the answer lies in using the Biblical concept of ‘crop rotation’ as a metaphor. The Israelites were told not to plant the same crop every season and to leave the field barren once every seven years. If we transfer this practice to metaphorical ‘crops’ that represent our different life activities, we are able to escape boredom.

This is because a fundamental aspect of Kierkegaardian philosophy is the ability to know what you want. To quote Chuck Palahniuk: “If you don’t know what you want,” the doorman said, “you end up with a lot you don’t.” –Fight Club Chapter 5. For Kierkegaard desire is the first of what I will later refer to as triggers. This brings us to the whole idea of stages in life that operate in accordance to specific triggers. Before that discussion however it should be noted that there is some debate about the Kierkegaardian stages of life. Some believe that they are on a continuum and a person may be in multiple stages at once. Although this is an interesting reading for the purposes of this article it will be assumed that the stages are mutually exclusive of each other and operate in a hierarchical structure.

The Four Stages:

1) The Uninitiated: This is what I like to call being stuck on autopilot. A person goes through the motions of life but is not really living. They do everything they believe they are supposed to do without enacting the freedom of a true self. Kierkegaard himself liked to use the metaphor for this stage as ‘an ant in the ant-colony’. The word uninitiated is often used to refer to this concept but I believe it is a Platonic term that deals with something much deeper. Many ancient thinkers from Plato to Cicero, probably people even today, all belongs to a little cult vaguely known as The Mysteries. At some time they believed to have died or had some sort of out of body experience, probably with the assistance of a hallucinogen known as urgot. Afterwards they had a newfound love of life and firmly believed in the concept of ‘the transmigration of the soul’ which should not be confused with crude notions of reincarnation. For Kierkegaard initiation is leaving the world of ants in the colony and taking one step closer to being human.

2) The Aesthetic Stage: The trigger of initiation is desire. Only once someone realizes that there is something in the world they want but cannot have, are they capable of having a true self. Once desire enters the picture, the person will go about trying to fulfill these desires. Reason is the driving capacity for the aesthetic life, it is used to go about fulfilling desires. Some people may be stuck in this phase their entire life and know only selfishness, which is better I suppose than never wanting thus remaining a selfless cog in the human hive-mind.

3) The Ethical Stage: The trigger out of the Aesthetic into the Ethical is guilt. After living a life of satisfying desire the person will realize at some point the existence of not only the self but the other. Probably through the course of personal hedonism the aesthetic person has greatly wronged other people. Once guilt is felt the person can no longer selfishly fulfill their own desires, rather they co-align their desire with that of other people and work collectively to build a better world. Reason is important still and has its uses but the main driving capacity of this phase is ethical reasoning. Instead of merely asking, “is X possible?” the question changes to something like, “ought I do X?” Again, for many people the story ends here, in fact for most people this is where it ends.

4) The Religious Stage: Even living an ethical life is not enough. We seem so insignificant compared to the cosmos. We are nothing more than a speck of dust and anything we do, even a blessed ethical life, is ultimately meaningless. The trigger into the religious phase is not being satisfied with merely the ethical and yearning for something more. This is called despair. Unlike the other triggers merely knowing despair does not uplift one into the religious phase of life, it only renders the individual as what is called a Knight of Despair. This stage is very mysterious and it is difficult to say whether or not Kierkegaard himself would have claimed knowledge of it first hand or if it is merely theoretical. Very few people ever come to know this stage of life and those that do are Knights of Faith.

The Knight of Faith

This is my favorite part in Kierkegaard! He asks us to pretend for a moment that we are Abraham. God tells us to kill our son that we were promised generations through ‘as numerous as the stars in the sky and the sands by the sea’. If this were to happen today people would probably assume they were insane and go see a shrink. Abraham on the other hand does not even question God and simply begins to obey. He is going to commit an act that is completely irrational and unethical. If he kills Isaac the generations promised cannot possibly be born and murder of one’s child is typically considered a heinous sin. Abraham has faith and knows that somehow everything will all be alright. This is the famous Kierkegaardian slogan, the teleological suspension of the ethical. The knight of faith knows when to abandon all rational and ethical thinking for some higher cause. To use another Kierkegaardian metaphor, like a dancer doing a leap in the air they have one fluid motion and land perfectly in accordance with the dance. The leap is one of faith and the capacity to know when to jump is grace. I particularly appreciated this part because whenever something bad happened in my life, instead of like many atheists becoming bitter at God, my mother used to always say, “Just another one of God’s dancing lessons”.

The Seducer and The Married Man

In another book Kierkegaard relays a diary from a Casanova or Don Juan. This individual is stuck in the aesthetic life and takes advantage of women by bedding them once and throwing them away. He is trying to find that ultimate moment. He glimpses eternity and desperately wants to be ‘the final kiss of the movie’. This is what is known as romantic love. It is the ultimate anticipation usually heightened by challenges. The tale would not be a romantic one if the lovers were not star-crossed, there must always be a proverbial dragon to slay. In response to this diary a married preacher replies. He outlines what is called conjugal love. This is about appreciating what you have already had and loving someone for what has actually happened between you. Unlike the romantic lover the married man not only glimpses eternity but may live in it as his love lasts potentially forever.

The ideal situation is when there is great romantic love in the form of anticipation and romantic challenges and the moment it is realized and the final kiss of the movie happens, it immediately becomes a deep conjugal love of appreciation. So love is really a balancing act between anticipation and appreciation. What I find particularly interesting is that the girls being seduced by the Casanova are uninitiated and it is not until ‘they realize there is something they want but cannot have’ in the form of the seducer, that they are uplifted into the aesthetic stage of life and take one step closer to being human.In that light the infamous Seducer is really not a bad guy afterall, just another soul on the journey out of the ant colony.


Comments 12 comments

Laurie Smith 6 years ago

Thank you for putting this together. Up until I googled into your hub I couldn't find anything on Kierkegaard as concise and understandable to the uninitiated as your intro, not even close. In my brief but thorough search, I've discovered that the vast majority of 21st century philosophers philosophizing on the old masters are even harder to understand than the incomprehensible theories they are attempting to explain and simplify. You did a great job, and I've ordered the book you recommemded to get started. I am a novice creative writing student who has an idea to write a fictional story around Kierkegaard's philosophy (because like you, I've discovered he's my favorite).


Chris 5 years ago

Would you describe religious suicide terrorists as Knights of Faith? Are their leaps into the absurd admirable acts?


H P Roychoudhury profile image

H P Roychoudhury 5 years ago from Guwahati, India

The fact of philosophy of any religious faith is nothing but to know yourself and your instinct. Before knowing end when the philosophical thought is twisted by external force, the self get involved in terrorist or any other kind of activity.


Sethareal profile image

Sethareal 5 years ago Author

I think you missed the point entirely Chris, terrorists are hardly in the ethical stage. As Roychoudhurry points out they are governed by selfish motivations such as the glory of martyrdom or rewards in heaven. They are not Knights of Faith as seen by the results of their actions, they are Knights of Despair. They baptize no one as they actually murder others and themselves.


RNMSN profile image

RNMSN 5 years ago from Tucson, Az

wonderful hub sethareal! I agree too about terrorists being knghts of despair

I dont think there are many knights of fath/closest in our lifetime I feel was Mother Teresa but even she admitted to having many doubts of faith/that's why love her so much and mourn her passing/she was a beautiful soul

I know you are busy if you are working on your doctorate but hey!!! we hubbers need more of your work! you are an exceptional writer....:) so what are you doing at 0353 hours anyway? you're just sitting there at the computer anyway!!! so write dadgumit :)

sorry now you found me ?? well just wait!! the nagging gets beter :)

love to you

barbara b


dfager profile image

dfager 5 years ago from Federal Way, Washington

Great hub, I really enjoyed it. It would be interesting to do a study to compare the phenomelogical aspects and simularities of different existential philosopher's, stages of becoming oneself. I can see universal elements even in Eastern philosophy. (I'm not sure I understand what I just said, but I feel good about it) Finding universals in subjectivity, what sense does that make? I better stop before I bury myself.


RNMSN profile image

RNMSN 5 years ago from Tucson, Az

Definitions of phenomenology (n)

phe·nom·e·nol·o·gy [ f? nòmm? nóll?jee ]

study of phenomena: in philosophy, the science or study of phenomena, things as they are perceived, as opposed to the study of being, the nature of things as they are

philosophical investigation of experience: the philosophical investigation and description of conscious experience in all its varieties without reference to the question of whether what is experienced is objectively real

See full definition · Encarta World English Dictionary

well

that didn't help me :)

but I shore nuff loved those them thar purty words you all just sadied!!!! :)


RNMSN profile image

RNMSN 5 years ago from Tucson, Az

no for real, the second defintion is where I believe all the myth/fairy tales/Fey/Wild Ride, all of those...where they began

I see and hear these all the time

who is to say I am crazy/twisted?

after all

"two heads are better than one!" and where would we all be without people worse imagination or radio tuner is tuned into other cosmic radio waves ?


dfager profile image

dfager 5 years ago from Federal Way, Washington

I've had a favorite essay for years titled Phenomenological Existential Christianity. My current operating system won't read the drive where I saved the article. I thought Kierkegaard's leap of faith was a leap from objectively following Christianity to subjectively following Christianity. Kierkegaard talks about his personal Jesus. How could Abraham act if he wasn't convinced of his personal relationship with his God.

How can existentialism be objective? I imagine if you are studying it as a subject but not if you're applying it. But I know that I am crazy, I'm bipolar.


RNMSN profile image

RNMSN 5 years ago from Tucson, Az

so...hello there friend


John Sarkis profile image

John Sarkis 4 years ago from Los Angeles, CA

Love Kirk...voted up


Anonymous 3 years ago

The simplest proof that terrorists are not Knights of Faith is that their terrible acts are carried through to completion. In Abraham's story, God intervened at the last moment, and prevented Abraham from *actually* going through with the unethical. No such interventions on 9/11 and other terrorist attacks...

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working