# Apollonius

Apollonius was born in Perga in southern Asia Minor in about 262 BC. He spent most of his life in Alexandria where he studied under the successors of Euclid; though he did spend a few years in Pergamum in western Asia Minor at a new university and library modelled on that at Alexandria.

Not much else is known about the life of Apollonius.

Apollonius is best remembered as one of the great mathematicians of antiquity. He was named ‘The Great Geometer’, mainly because of his work on conic sections. His greatest work, named Conics consisted of eight books and contained some 400 propositions. The eighth book is lost, but the other seven have been preserved. The first four are in Greek and expand on the work on conic sections of Euclid and other mathematicians; the other three have come down to us as ninth century Arabic translations and are more specialised.

Apollonius was also an astronomer. In contrast to the model Eudoxus proposed to represent the motion of the planets using concentric spheres, Apollonius proposed two alternative models called epicyclic motion and eccentric motion. In the epicyclic scheme, a planet was assumed to move uniformly about a small circle whose centre also moved uniformly around the circumference of a larger circle whose centre was the centre of the Earth. In the eccentric scheme, a planet was assumed to move uniformly about a large circle whose centre also moved uniformly around the circumference of a smaller circle whose centre was the centre of the Earth. These ideas led directly to the scheme for the motion of the planets later devised by Ptolemy.

Apollonius died in Alexandria around 200 BC.

## A contribution of Apollonius to mathematics

Apollonius introduced the names ellipse, parabola and hyperbola for the three types of conic section, and obtained the conic sections from one circular double cone. If the double cone is cut by a plane, the curve formed by the intersection of the cone and the plane is called a conic section.

A circle is, of course, a special kind of ellipse, and is obtained by making a section through one cone parallel to the base of the cone.

Generally an ellipse is obtained by taking a section through the cone at a slight angle, and with all points on the curved face of the cone.

If the angle is increased so that the section goes through the base of the cone but with the vertex on the curved face of the cone and on the opposite side of the centre of the base of the cone, then we get a parabola.

If the angle is increased still further so that the section goes through the base of the cone and with the vertex on the curved face of the cone but on the same side of the centre of the base of the cone, then we get one branch of an hyperbola. The other branch is shown on the other half of the double cone.

Apollonius investigated the geometry of these conic sections and recorded them in his Conics . These ideas later formed the basis of the celestial mechanics of Kepler and Newton in the seventeenth century.

Peter L. Griffiths 6 years ago

A conic section is never a perfect ellipse which is a cylindric section.

lesbillgates 6 years ago Author

I disagree. An ellipse is indeed a cylindric section, but it is also a conic section. In projective geometry, a cylinder is considered to be a cone whose apex is at infinity.

lesbillgates 6 years ago Author

Peter L.Griffiths 6 years ago

By perfect ellipse I mean one which is symmetrical East-West as well as North-South, and is the shape of all the planetary orbits round the Sun as well as the artificial bodies round the Earth. A conic section is not symmetrical East-West and is therefore not a perfect ellipse. This error originates in Newton's Principia who frequently mentions conic sections but never mentions cylindric sections.

lesbillgates 6 years ago Author

To allay my doubts, I consulted a colleague. This is what he said:

'The ellipse (from a conic section or whatever) is perfect ... else it would not be called an ellipse. It is symmetric about both axes, etc, etc.

But when seen in relation to the cone, the ellipse's "center" (where axes intersect) does not match the cone's central axis. This may be the root of his confusion. He may think the ellipse is centered on the cone and thinks "the upper part must be smaller as the radius gets smaller".'

I hope this makes it clear. An ellipse from a conic section is completely symmetrical, and Newton did not make any mistake!

Peter L. Griffiths 6 years ago

The word ellipse originates from Apollonius of Perga who used it for his own purposes to refer to a conic section not a cylindric section. That is why I refer to the cylindric section as a perfect ellipse. The familiar algebraic formula for an ellipse refers to the symmetrical cylindric section not to the conic section which has no symmetrical centre for the intersection of axes.

lesbillgates 6 years ago Author

I am sorry that you continue to argue the point.

Apollonius himself in Book 1 Proposition 13 of Conics derived the formula for an ellipse from a section of an oblique circular cone - it doesn't even need to be a right circular cone. See http://www.lesbillgates.com/ellipse.html

for a copy of an interpretation by the renowned History of Mathematics scholar Carl B Boyer.

Peter L. Griffiths 5 years ago

Book 1 Proposition 13 of Conics fails to mention any location for the foci and is therefore not discussing a perfect ellipse.

lesbillgates 5 years ago Author

The formula obtained, which is equivalent to

(x-a)^2/a^2 + y^2/b^2 = 1

is that of a perfect ellipse.

To claim that Apollonius did not discuss the foci is a 'red herring'

This discussion is now closed. Any further comments that disagree with the facts will be deleted.

Peter L. Griffiths 2 years ago

Johannes Kepler in his little known paper on Conic Sections published in 1603 brings together the 5 conic sections known to the Greek mathematicians, the straight line, the circle, the ellipse, the parabola and the hyperbola, and wrongly supposes that his own discovery of the focus applied with pins and thread will clarify these conic sections. It is not until 1618 that Kepler recognises that the location of the Sun is the focus within the orbiting planets.