Nuclear Weapons in Space

Nukes in Space?

Should nuclear weapons be allowed in space?

See results without voting
Smashing an Asteroid
Smashing an Asteroid
Nuclear explosion in space
Nuclear explosion in space
United Nations
United Nations

Asteroid Hazard

On the 13th December, at a meeting of the American Geophysical Union, Bob Weaver of Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, said that the latest models they are using, still show that a nuclear explosion would blow, an asteroid measuring 500meters long, into pieces small enough not to threaten the Earth.

He said that these explosions would be effective on the surface of the asteroid, unlike in the movies where they have to bore deep into the rock to place the bombs.

He said that, although other methods of avoiding an asteroid hitting Earth were being considered, like using an explosion, to nudge an asteroid away from Earth. He considered that blowing it to pieces should be considered in those cases where we get a year or less notice of an approaching hazard.

Today, we probably have the technology, to establish a nuclear defense against asteroids. However, when dealing with space and nuclear weapons, international problems arise.

I believe that the United Nations should set up an organization to deal solely with the possibility of an asteroid colliding with Earth. They should have experts in this field from around the world and the funds available to build a viable defense.

If these experts considered a nuclear option a necessity, then there should be agreements set up for the implementation, security and control of this option.

However appalling the thought we may have of nuclear weapons being in space, we should put them aside if, without them our species could be made extinct in the same way it is considered Dinosaurs were.

More by this Author


Comments 6 comments

sparkster profile image

sparkster 4 years ago from United Kingdom

Here's a relevant quote from my Mother Earth Prison Planet hub for a bit of insight:

Von Braun had claimed back in 1974 that the hidden agenda of the covert government would be to promote space weapons as

1st - A shield against the Russians

2nd - A defense against rogue nations

3rd - A defense against asteroid and meteors

4th and finally - Protection from an extraterrestrial threat


sparkster profile image

sparkster 4 years ago from United Kingdom

We have been here for millions, if not billions, of years and we haven't been wiped out by an asteroid yet!

Sure there is an asteroid due to collide with Earth in 2029 but I do not think that nuclear weapons are the answer.

Plus then there's the fact that the extraterrestrials are trying to stop us weaponizing space because they know we will become a threat. These weapons could also be used to target incoming extraterrestrial vehicles whilst we are told that they are asteroids.

Donna Hare testified at the Disclosure Project that the extraterrestrials would be used as the final threat against humanity in order to implement the weaponization of space - it's just not necessary.


rafken profile image

rafken 5 years ago from The worlds my oyster Author

seebasic. I think you are probably right. It sounds like someone is trying to keep a budget for his science program.


seebasic profile image

seebasic 5 years ago from Germany

For me this is unintelligible. That sounds like a constructed fear, according to a sales pitch.


CheyenneAutumn profile image

CheyenneAutumn 5 years ago

Travel - the only trouble with nukes to hit asteroids is that if we do hit and it is a large one - there may be hundreds of pieces coming in rather then one - or we may miss and then ....


travel_man1971 profile image

travel_man1971 5 years ago from Bicol, Philippines

Although, I voted for nuclear bomb to be used on asteroids posing danger on Earth; I think, the best alternative is to use laser to destroy incoming danger from space, such as asteroid.

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working