Virgin Galactic and Their SpaceShipTwo and White Knight System

For as long as man can remember, he has dreamed of going to the stars. It is only through the past 60 years that the ability to do so has flourished and developed. But not just anyone can go into space. Only a select few can go after years of training and even then only a small number of those who are qualified actually go. Sometimes, a private citizen was able to go into space but only after paying an exorbitant amount of money. For the average Joe, it is impossible to gain access to such an opportunity. But with recent developments in the private sector, maybe our chance is just around the corner.

SS1 attached to the belly of the White Knight.
SS1 attached to the belly of the White Knight. | Source

SpaceShipOne and Virgin Galactic

In the early millennium, a challenged was issued to the world by the X-Prize Foundation: get a spacecraft weighing a minimum of 595 pounds to a height of 10 kilometers twice in a two week period and you will receive $10 million. Known as the Ansari X-Prize, it was captured by SpaceShipOne (SS1) which was designed by Burt Rutan and financed by Microsoft’s Paul Allen. The first flight occurred on September 30, 2004 and was piloted by Mike Mewill, who took SS1 to an altitude of 337,500 feet after detaching from White Knight, an experimental design that took off like an airplane but separated from SS1 at 46,000 ft. He did encounter some spin issues as he made his landing but it was determined to be pilot error and not a mechanical issue. On the second flight SS1 was piloted by Brian Binnie. SS1 fired its nitrous oxide and rubber-based fuel rockets after detaching from White Knight to achieve a height of 367,400 feet, which was 40,000 feet more than the X-Prize required. Ironically, a preflight spill of coffee on Brian by his mother-in-law added about 12 ounces to the total weight and cost the team an extra 200 feet of altitude. Both times SS1 landed at Mojave Airport 24 minutes after rocket ignition (Svital 52, Rutan 31, 34).

Many major departures from traditional rockets were incorporated into the design of SS1 and White Knight. The biggest difference was how it took off like a plane and landed like one but required two separate craft to reach space. SS1 made use of drag to help slow down for landing by rotating its wings by 65 degrees. This also ensured that the craft would not overheat and it was also a stabilizing factor. The fuel mentioned earlier is a liquid nitrous oxide/solid synthetic rubber mixture that provides 18,000 pounds of thrust at about 3 g's of force. The rocket can be turned off and on at will and just takes a day to replace. (Rutan 32, 34)

Shortly after, Richard Branson of Virgin Atlantic teamed up with Rulan and Allen to form Virgin Galactic. This company aims to be the stepping stone into space for people who want to go but can’t afford how much NASA charges. Originally, the goal was for a 2007 launch of the fleet of ships that were to follow with the ability of people to pay $190,000 per person, but FAA concerns and design failures have held back production (52).

SpaceShipTwo in flight.
SpaceShipTwo in flight. | Source

SpaceShipTwo and the Spaceport

But recently the successor to SS1, SpaceShipTwo (named VSS Enterprise) launched with great success. It is the same concept as SS1 but is over twice as big, at 60 ft long. The same technology is used, with WhiteKnightTwo (named EVE) able to carry 35,000 lbs to an altitude of about 55,000 ft and then launching VSS Enterprise. Finally, when it wants to return to Earth, SS2 used the glide method to coast back to the surface. It is designed to carry space tourists and has both side windows as well as ceiling windows for a great view. If all goes as intended it will carry up to 6 passengers and up to 2 astronaut pilots ("Array", "Virgin Galactic").

EVE and Enterprise will be made of carbon composite materials, allowing for increased strength and decreased costs. For propulsion, EVE will make use of "four Pratt and Whitney PW308A engines" while Enterprise will utilize a special hybrid rocket. EVE will be a vastly different design from WK1 because it will have a central-docking area for Enterprise and a side fuselage on each side, allowing Enterprise to have more room to dock safely and to also increase turn-around time ("Virgin Galactic").

Enterprise detaches from EVE.
Enterprise detaches from EVE. | Source

Now it needed to prove it could fly. On October 10, 2010 VSS Enterprise successfully detached from EVE at 45,000 feet and glided back down to Mojave Air and Spaceport. No complications arose and pilots Pete Siebold and Mike Alsbury reported no difficulties in maneuvering the craft. This test came after 40 flights by EVE, 4 with Enterprise attached to it, to prove that EVE could function within norms ("VSS Enterprise"). Shortly after, a rocketed flight by Enterprise also proved successful.

Spaceport America housing EVE and Enterprise.
Spaceport America housing EVE and Enterprise. | Source

But where would one launch such a craft? In 2005, Virgin Galactic and the State of New Mexico agreed to build the Spaceport America. At $200 million, it was designed to be the launch and arrival point of spaceship flights for the company. At over 27 square miles, it certainly covers a lot of ground and provides all the framework the company needs ("Array"). It was finished on Oct. 18, 2011.

Disaster and an Uncertain Future

Halloween 2014 was a different kind of horror than the typical holiday entails. On its 55th flight and the first powered one in nine months, Enterprise was destroyed two minutes after separating from EVE over the Mojave Desert. One of the pilots did manage to eject from the craft but the other did not survive the incident. Initial reports saw people claiming to see Enterprise explode in the air. The blame was quickly placed on an experimental fuel-mix of thermoset plastic with nitrous oxide that had previously tested without any problems on Earth but had not been tested in flight before. Some even wondered if the rocket had undergone a hard start, or when an excess of fuel is in the chamber and the pressure buildup becomes too much (Hutchinson "One", Freeman, O'Neill).

Source

However, calmer heads (namely the National Transportation Safety Board or NTSB) were able to show that it was not the fuel that caused the disaster, for the engines and fuel systems were recovered intact and without the damage an explosion would have caused. As it turns out, the wings that normally allow the craft to use air drag to coast back to Earth were the culprit. Telemetry shows that for reasons unknown, the co-pilot who did not survive the crash released the safety lever on the drag wings, causing then to become free and deploy, thus ripping the spacecraft apart. Normally this premature release would not have been a problem but because Enterprise was not at full speed the wings were not held by aerodynamic forces and were able to cause havoc. It is important to note that the lever is normally released but only after Mach 1.4, for at this point the forces keep it down until a downarc in the trajectory occurs, allowing the pilot to abort if needed. Enterprise was only going about Mach 1 at the time of breakup (Klotz "SpaceShipTwo," Reyes).

The NTSB had a lot on their plate. Sure, they found out what caused the failure, but then they had to look into Virgin Galactic to see if a physiological or management issue was at play. It could have been pressure to perform to the fullest that got to the co-pilot, making him do something he normally wouldn't have (Hutchinson "NTSB"). Finally near the end of July in 2015 the NTSB released its findings. They concluded that the co-pilot who was killed in the crash made a fatal mistake that Scaled Composites did not consider humans to be capable of and therefore had not installed a failsafe to compensate. They had assumed that the co-pilot would follow the instructions of engaging the feathers at Mach 1.4, where aerodynamics would have prevented the cataclysm seen on October. Cockpit video shows the pilot unlocking the feathering system too early, despite protocol. Scaled Composites has promised to ensure this will not happen again (Geuss, Reyes).

VSS Unity revealed to the world.
VSS Unity revealed to the world. | Source
VSS Unity on the tarmac.
VSS Unity on the tarmac. | Source

The Path Redeemed

The move to get the program back on track took a big step when in February of 2016 Virgin Galactic debuted their new SpaceShipTwo. Named VSS Unity, it is the first ship fully built by the company following a restructuring from the fallout of the accident. As it turns out, 75% of the craft had been finished when Enterprise was destroyed, possibly helping to ensure that the company did not fold as it strived for a quick turnaround. And not to worry, for Unity will have many upgrades to its predecessor, some planed prior and some as a result of the tragedy, such as a computer release of the tail wing feature as opposed to a human manually disengaging it. Virgin Galactic doesn't want anymore failures to take away from their goals, and they are taking as many steps as is required to accomplish this (Klotz "New," Berger).

Works Cited

"Array." Overview – Spaceport. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 May 2014.

Berger, Eric. "Virgin Galactic moves on from crash, debuts flashy new spaceship." arstechnica.com. Conte Nast., 19 Feb. 2016. Web. 08 Mar. 2016.

Freeman, David and Macrina Cooper-White. "Virgin Galactic's SpaceShipTwo Crashes During Test Flight Over Mojave Desert." The Huffington Post. N.p., 31 Oct. 2014. Web. 02 Dec. 2014.

Geuss, Megan. "SpaceShipTwo crash: Aerospace company failed to consider human error, NTSB says." ars technica. Conte Nast., 28 Jul. 2015. Web. 17 Aug. 2015.

Hutchinson, Lee. "NTSB: SpaceShipTwo Broke Apart When 'Feathering' Activated Early." ars technica. Condé Nast., 03 Nov. 2014. Web. 02 Dec. 2014.

- - - . "One Confirmed Dead as Virgin Galactic SpaceShipTwo Destroyed in Test Flight." ars technica. Condé Nast., 31 Oct. 2014. Web. 02 Dec. 2014.

Klotz, Irene. "New Virgin Galactic SpaceShipTwo Makes Debut." Discoverynews.com. Discovery Communications, LLC., 19 Feb. 2016. Web. 08 Mar. 2016.

---. "SpaceShipTwo's Rocket Engine Did Not Cause Fatal Crash." Discoverynews.com. Discovery Communications, LLC., 03 Nov. 2014. Web. 02 Dec. 2014.

O'Neill, Ian. "Virgin Galactic's SpaceShipTwo Destroyed During Test Flight." Discoverynews.com. Discovery Communications, LLC., 31 Oct. 2014. Web. 02 Dec. 2014.

Reyes, Tim. "NTSB discovers pilot error in SpaceShipTwo investigation." Astronomy.com. Kalmbach Publishing Co., 03 Nov. 2014. Web. 04 Aug. 2016.

Rutan, Burt. "Rocket for the Rest of Us." National Geographic April 2005: 31-2, 34. Print. 29 Sept. 2014.

Svital, Kathy A and Eric Levin. “SpaceShipOne Opens Private Rocket Frontier.” Discover Jan. 2005: 52. Print. 12 May 2014.

"Virgin Galactic Unveils SpaceShipTwo, the World's First Manned Commercial Spacecraft." Virgin Galactic. N.p., 07 Dec. 2009. Web. 25 Sept. 2014.

"VSS Enterprise Completes First Manned Glide Flight." Virgin Galactic. N.p., 10 Oct. 2010. Web. 26 Sept. 2014.

© 2014 Leonard Kelley

More by this Author


Comments 1 comment

Suresh Chopane profile image

Suresh Chopane 2 years ago from chandrapur,maharastra,India

In next 10 years the will not be the monopoly of govt.s but many new companies will come Forward to fly into space and space tourism will florish..

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working