trueness truth and trust

A Dialectic Paradigm


For Attaining


Rhetorical Truth ~


The Primary Dialectic Concept For Deriving Rhetorical Truth:

Might we attempt to use rhetoric to form the words of thought that might motivate the deeds that might will the development for the spirit-self-transcendence of our soul, mind, and body to a supreme magnificence?!

We often use our thought, word, and deed derived from our purpose, motive and intent to attract the attention intention that manifest, create and animates the egotistical life incidences, occurrences and experiences that diminish the worth of our very own transcendence capacity, ability and potential...


Deductive Argument Stating The Explicit Syllogism:

Establishing the Dialectic For Rhetorical Truth ~

Premise Proposition 1 - Thought, Word, and Deed are desires…

Premise Proposition 2 - Thought is to word as word is to deed; they are the forms for being expression used by body, mind and soul of the spirit-self for expression form and function of being...

Premise Conclusion: Thoughts form our being universe for they are the concept in its construct-design perfected, evolved and created by the emotion, desire and will of our being… Thoughts are holistic in the quality, attribute and nature of natural law for they perfect, evolve and create harmony, balance and equilibrium from the negative and positive aspects of the universe to form a neutral unbiased inclusive, civil and selfless existence universe... The challenge for humanity is to balance the negatively charged universe with its thought-energy to establish the synergy-equilibrium derived from inclusive civil selfless harmony...


Reasoning for Dialectic Paradigm:

All of the negative effort of humanity is for naught because we are of one-energy; and it abhors the restricted flow of its potential as selfish insignificance that does not facilitate the evolution of the whole... When we do not use a true dialectic means for designing the way to manage the task as a whole existence we diminish the potential of the whole system...

A standardized convention paradigm is needed to provide a dialectic trueness, truth and trust for the rhetoric of language, culture, and social discourse for the logic and argument of our thought, word, and deed ~

herein is the model: lego (discourse)` lexis (word) logos (argument)...



Standardizing Dialectic Discourse Paradigm:

Language, verbiage and speech needs a standardized convention paradigm for providing dialectic truth in rhetoric that formulates action, deed and its resulting response...

Argument Supporting Standardized Rhetorical Convention Presented In Paradigm for Obtaining Dialectic Truth In Discourse ~

Language is simply a means (convention) used to convey our desire, emotion and will that formulate the terms of thought, word, and deed...

The convention and principle purpose of logic motive and rule intent found in language quality, attribute and nature does not exist, as yet as a standard form... There is no set system of rhetorical rules establishing the quality of word, thought, and deed by some standard of dialect measure ...

The professions have evolved strict jargon; but they have no set expression, system-form; nor rule function controlling language in terms of quantity, attribute and nature of purpose, motive and intent conveyed, envisioned, or performed...

The science of rhetoric I propose provides a clear, concise and decisive end, mean and way to derive a rhetorical dialectic that defines the quality, attribute and nature of thought, word and deed in terms of inclusive civil selflessness...


What does this concept provide in the scheme of things?

  • Well, it means there is a way to end the abuses found in language usage and the deeds propagated by its bad information...
  • There is a way to order thought that eliminates the lies conveyed by false pretenses...
  • There is a means of controlling the attributes of thought word and deed by having a standard for the expression form and function of the quality attribute and nature of the language used to convey correspondence, information, and data message fact development...

Its not going to keep people from trying to deceive each other; but it surely will provide a mechanism for deciphering deceit so everyone is more aware of when and where the incident is occurring...

You see our words express the degree of our passion's desire and the intention of our will… Thought derives the passion in the deed performed by the body, mind and soul, so it is only logical that there should be a word order establishing the quality, attribute and nature of the way one expresses passions, feelings and intentions in terms of thought, word, and deed (its) spectrum of quality, attribute and nature ...



Conclusion, Outcome and Result:

This discovery is a convention for deriving and conveying an understanding of such that creates a science for the rhetoric of language that defines its dialectic truths; it is of the utmost importance as a convention in the design, conception and construct for every endeavor of social, artistic and scientific significance... The axiomatic algorithm rules developed and defined provide a syllogism, logic and proposition argument for deriving the dialectic truth and rhetorical quality of expressions, forms and functions of thought, word, and deed...

The triad fractal formulas are based on the root fractal of the thought set: desire, emotion, and will (DEW)... The DEW set compounds compose a consistent system and operation for rhetorical quality oversight... DEW thought sets are in unity with all aspects of word and deed application throughout the infinite existence application for which it was formed... It follows that words are a form of thought as are deeds... It also follows: Thought, words, and deeds express desire, emotion, and will in all discourse...

The discourse using fractal expression, form and function provides for the quality, attribute and nature so that rhetorical trueness, truth and trust can be ascertained as a matter of paradigm dialectic application... It simply requires the statement of purpose, motive and intent of each impact, cause and effect, thus providing a statement of proof, evidence and fact to base the quality attribute and nature of all discourse...


P.S... More thoughts are to follow as this theory is unfolded to display the extent of this understanding…

Note: The enclosed content text of the loua articles, post, blog, or hub herein are the intellectual property of TM dewtobe ® and lparchambault loua~8.24.2008© there is no authorization for use without direct permission from the author, loua.

2 comments

loua profile image

loua 6 years ago from Elsewhere, visiting Earth ~ the segregated community planet Author

Larry your remark 1):"Rhetoric is not a discipline which is hierarchically subordinate to dialectic". My response 1): Rhetoric is not a discipline tool that actually provides any structural integrity to begin with; its a wild-west show gun full of blanks, its just for the impressionist to wow the crowd... Its about smoking guns and much to do about nothing, its all about the showiness the impression that subdues the opponent for the right of impression it has no substance of its own, it borrows from opinion, fact, and fiction to substantiate its claims... It provides for building a plane but it has no means to level what is built as it has no standard dimensions that allows truth of the worth for the structure constructed... Now a dialectic is the tool that defines the needed integrity of the rhetoric; but it lacks the expansive property of the rhetorical market place, it is the qualifier of intrinsic value the chosen material to build the rhetorical structures used to evolve the senses...

I have used the dialectic tool to build the primary axiom for the science of rhetoric mechanism as a jig for fastening the meaning of words so that they might be used to fix the language in a three dimensional array that will prove the needed building blocks for human evolution..

My point is that all the notions built of rhetoric like law and order of social science are not subordinate to logic, this is kind of my point: to draw attention to the fact that our leaders are impotent in the erecting a system that orchestrates the management of the masses in an equitable fashion that provides a spring for the evolution of humanity... Without logic their effort is the repetition of the old deceit, duplicity and deception deriving the multiplicity of mistakes made over and over ad infinitum...

Larry your remark 2):The modalities of the links between rhetoric and dialectic must be seen in a somewhat different light: rhetoric and dialectic should be viewed as two complementary disciplines. My response 2): Efforts to establish clear boundaries or unequivocal conceptual or moral hierarchical relationships between the two disciplines fail under modern scrutiny, and that therefore, they must be conceived as being mutually dependent. Larry, its like diet is to exercise, as introspection is to conscience and as vision is to manifestation they constitute a lifestyle... A Dialectic (standard) is a Rhetorical Paradigm, they are different in that the dialectic is an emotional word as rhetoric is a desire word as paradigm is a will word... You can sense the feeling and awareness of the terms as they compliment each other... The lack of interest in this awareness is the founded in the desire to deceive, its recorded in many text as the avoidance of this discovery...

Larry your remark 3):This flies in the face of your premise #1 " Thought, Word, and Deed are desires ", when in fact they may be imperatives... My response 3):Indeed they are adjacent super set systems of all desire sets...

Larry your remark 4):Likewise, with premise #2 " Thought is to Word, as Word is to Deed "...Exchange Deed for Action ( practical knowledge ) and you have a conflict between theoretic knowledge ( Thought ), and practical knowledge ( Action/Deed )... The two are quite separate where the one seeks Truth through dialectic discourse, the other seeks Action through practical knowledge... My response 4): Larry, thought is an impulse; therefore it cannot be restricted to theoretical application, it is a fundamental imperative in all aspects of existence; its the primary derivative and term for every other action and term... Here is where the lack of convention is addressed: the deed is the desire of the emotional action of the will response... Words must reflex the primary set of desire emotion and will to reflex the truth... The ancients knew if they followed Aristotle's notion this consequence was inevitable, so they opted for retaining the deceptive nature and refused to develop a word convention... I am now again introducing the notion proposed oh so long ago; but I have the plan, goal and objective for the implementation, and the environment is almost right for its acceptance...

Larry your remark 5): Your argument is heroic in its attempt to convince humans of an impending self-imposed catastrophe, and I would agree your proposed solutions are logical and attainable, but for one major stumbling block : Human nature...Do you really think a significant number of humans would even begin to become intellectually engaged and contribute to implementing your well-reasoned arguments..? I don't think that is going to happen anytime soon... My response 5): I have no faith in the physical nature of the animal man; but I have the utmost confidence in the spiritual nature of the All of which we compose its ranks... Once the human brain is informed by the spirit of the All's intention it will comply as need be...

Thanks for the review Larry, as always your friend... .

Wishing you the best of holiday cheer... lou


maven101 profile image

maven101 6 years ago from Northern Arizona

Rhetoric is not a discipline which is hierarchically subordinate to dialectic. The modalities of the links between rhetoric and dialectic must be seen in a somewhat different light: rhetoric and dialectic should be viewed as two complementary disciplines. Efforts to establish clear boundaries or unequivocal conceptual or moral hierarchical relationships between the two disciplines fail under modern scrutiny, and that therefore, they must be conceived as being mutually dependent. This flies in the face of your premise #1 " Thought, Word, and Deed are desires ", when in fact they may be imperatives...

Likewise, with premise #2 " Thought is to Word, as Word is to Deed "...Exchange Deed for Action ( practical knowledge ) and you have a conflict between theoretic knowledge ( Thought ), and practical knowledge ( Action/Deed )...the two are quite separate where the one seeks Truth through dialectic discourse, the other seeks Action through practical knowledge...

Your argument is heroic in its attempt to convince humans of an impending self-imposed catastrophe, and I would agree your proposed solutions are logical and attainable, but for one major stumbling block : Human nature...Do you really think a significant number of humans would even begin to become intellectually engaged and contribute to implementing your well-reasoned arguments..? I don't think that is going to happen anytime soon...

Thanks for this clear-eyed and cognitive Hub, well-written as are all your other efforts here...

Happy holidays, my friend, to you and yours...Larry

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working