The Malthusian Population Theory and Criticisms

Thomas R. Malthus (1776 - 1834)
Thomas R. Malthus (1776 - 1834)

Reverend Thomas R. Malthus was born in England in 1766. Throughout his later years of life, he was an enigmatic sociologist. One of his most popular topics is the theory on the growth and resources of the human population. This theory is known as the Malthusian Population Theory.

Rev. Thomas Malthus was of the view that the world's population was growing more rapidly than its food supple. He argues that the population increases geometrically (2, 4, 8, 16), but food supplies grow only arithmetically (2, 3, 4, 5). Eventually the growth of the population must slow down or it will be stopped.

Malthus stated that if this growth trend were allowed to continue, it would lead to widespread misery for the majority of the people. Malthus' recommendation for slowing the population growth he called preventive checks

What is birth rate?

Birth rate, also known as the crude birth rate, refers to the number of living babies born to every 1000 people in a population at a given time.

Crude birth rate is calculated by dividing the number of live births times one thousand people by the total population

(no. of live births x 1000) / the total population

Preventive Checks

Thomas Malthus described preventive checks as methods that peopleconsciously use to slow down the rapid growth of the population. He meant preventative checks to include late marriages, sexual restraint, celibacy, and spacing children further apart. All of which are meant to reduce birth rates. He denounced artificial means of birth control in marriages. He argued that by postponing marriages, couples could, and must take responsibility for the number of children they have.

This idea of his was aimed only at the rich as he thought poor people did not have the capacity to exercise sexual restraint. They would continue to procreate and the population would continue to increase rapidly and deplete the resources. Because of this, he was against poor laws, which gave the poor access to welfare benefits and, in his opinion, kept them poor. In order to eradicate poverty, he suggested jobs be created for them, and increase food production and educational opportunities

Positive Checks

If preventive checks were not observed, then the rapid growth of the population would be stopped by nature. Its tools would be what Malthus called positive checks. He claimed that the population would experience premature deaths. War, for example, would be an able tool for depopulation. Moreover, if war and other human devices are unsuccessful, epidemics, plagues, natural disasters, famines, and other pestilence will "with one mighty blow, level the population" (Malthus, 1798).

You can read the works of Malthus for more information

Simply put, Malthus figured the population was growing so rapidly that people would soon run out of food. In order to prevent this he recommended that preventive checks be put in place and practiced. Which means people should consciously reduce the number of children being born. If this fails, the growth of the population will be halted by nature (positive checks) by means of famines and diseases.

Criticisms

There have been many critics of Malthus who strongly disagree with his theory. Carl Marx for example, saw nothing wrong with the use of birth control and thought the problems would not arise due to population numbers, but due to the disorganization of the population. He stated that the problems stemmed from a capitalist system that oppresses the people.


Malthus failed to realize the possibilities of inventions, practices, and technological trends that help to monitor and improve the population's food supply (mass production).


There is also the issue of his refusal to accept birth control and the positive effects it could have on the growth of the population. Birth control is widely used and encouraged today for various reasons. Yes, it does help to slow down the growth of the population, but it also helps to prevent infections and diseases.


Poverty is a worldwide issue. While welfare is helpful, it is temporary and reflects negatively on the country's economy. If poor people are given the opportunity to better themselves through job placement and education, this will be beneficial to both the population and the economy. This is because they will be able to growth of many sectors.


With the growth of the technological and medical fields, there are decreased numbers of deaths from epidemics and sickly seasons.

What are your views on this theory? Do you agree with what Rev. Malthus has said? Or do you have a different opinion on the topic?

More by this Author


Comments 7 comments

elvis mawodzeke 4 years ago

Malthus failed to realise human potential to increase food production through the use of technology for example use of artificial fertilizers and irrigation .for example through the use of irrigation during the green revolution food supply was increased


Loi-Renee profile image

Loi-Renee 4 years ago from Jamaica Author

Hi Ore. You're right the growth pattern that he figured out was pure genius.


Ore N. Mavro profile image

Ore N. Mavro 4 years ago from Phoenix, Arizona

Yep..well he was a Reverend haha. I read about him before (in regards to "Malthusian Catastrophes") but I didn't know that...crazy. I still think that him figuring out population grows geometrically and resources arithmetically was pretty genius. It makes perfect sense to me.


Loi-Renee profile image

Loi-Renee 4 years ago from Jamaica Author

Yes, he does have a few good points. With so many things going around not using birth control or not proceeding with caution in anything sexual is a big risk. Then again, he did mention that intercourse was only to be between married couples and its only intention was for getting children.


Loi-Renee profile image

Loi-Renee 4 years ago from Jamaica Author

Funny you made that comparison Cardisa. I've been afraid of studying History all my life! I avoided it at all costs all through high school. :)

I don't think he actually believed in the people though, at least not the poor people. I don't think he gave the issue much thought. If he had, he could have come up with solutions that weren't as farfetched. The Neo-Malthusians were worse. They agreed that only certain classes should be allowed to procreate. In their minds, blacks and Chinese should be prevented from having children.

Can you imagine a world without them, or any other race for that matter!


Cardisa profile image

Cardisa 4 years ago from Jamaica

This hub reminds me of those of the hubber James A. Watkins. He is a history buff.

Malthus was trying to do the right thing the wrong way. He had no vision and could not see beyond the here and now and that was his problem. In my mind Marx was a visionary and he too had his flaws but he believed in the people. He believed that the wealth of the nation should be shared equally among the people. He did not believe in class barriers.

Malthus' idea of creating job was a great idea but his view that poor people could not control their sexuality was flawed as it was well known that women sought sexual gratification from their doctors as their urges were seen as a malaise....lol


Ore N. Mavro profile image

Ore N. Mavro 4 years ago from Phoenix, Arizona

I think the Rev had good points, minus the birth control bit. But apparently he was a fundamentalist Christian of some sort, so it's no surprise that he didn't believe in "wasting one's seed upon the earth". Shame, though. Other than that he was a solid thinker.

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working