What if the South Had Won the American Civil War?

The United States After a Confederate Victory
The United States After a Confederate Victory

The Victory of the Confederacy

The civil war between the North and the South was a brutal struggle between two competing visions of America. Its outcome would determine whether the United States as a nation would survive, and whether the ideals of the Constitution, that all men are created equal, would triumph over the devastation of war.

The war dragged on for nearly four years, and was fought from one end of the continent to another. Entire cities were burnt to the ground, and vast armies met and fought for supremacy on the bloody battlefields of Gettysburg, Vicksburg, and many others.

In the end, the Confederate capital fell to Union troops and the exhausted and hungry remnants of Lee's army surrendered at Appomattox. The President of the Confederacy was captured a short time later, allegedly disguised as a woman, as he tried to flee to the coast to catch a boat that would take him to safety. The North's victory was absolute. The South was destroyed and irrevocably changed.

But the outcome had been far from certain. More than once the armies of the Confederacy had threatened Washington itself. And many of the great Union victories could have turned into routs if only a single variable had been different.

What would America and the world have been like if the South had won the war?

General Robert E. Lee - The Great Confederate General Who Led the South to Victory and Occupied Washington
General Robert E. Lee - The Great Confederate General Who Led the South to Victory and Occupied Washington | Source
A Confederate Victory Would Have Meant Continued Slavery for Millions of African Americans and Their Descendants
A Confederate Victory Would Have Meant Continued Slavery for Millions of African Americans and Their Descendants

Secession - Tale of Two Countries

The most obvious and immediate outcome of a victory by the Southern States would have been the splitting of the United States into two countries - the Southern Confederacy with its capital at Richmond Virginia, and a northern United States, much reduced in size and population.

The two countries would have been fundamentally different economically and culturally. The South, dedicated to the principal of state rights would have been a loose confederacy, and not a true union; much more like the European Union than the United States. It would have hung on to the institution of slavery, and most likely have continued to utilize slaves primarily in agricultural enterprises, mainly to grow cotton.

One of the great weaknesses of the Confederacy during the war was that it was not as industrialized as its northern enemy, and as a result could not produce cannons, rifles and ammunition as quickly or in as great quantities as the Union. If the South had won the war, or if for example, the North had allowed the southern states to secede without trying to hold on to them by force, the South would likely have never fully industrialized. Its primary economic activity would have been cotton production, which it would probably have sold to England, whose textile mills were at the time the biggest market for cotton in the world. The South would have remained a largely rural and underdeveloped country, focused on agriculture.

African Americans would have been condemned to many more generations of slavery. Some would have succeeded in escaping to the North via the underground railway, but the rupture of relations between the North and the South would have made those escape routes much more difficult. Occasionally there would be slave rebellions but these would be ruthlessly crushed by the Confederate Army.

The Northern United States would have survived but they would have been deeply wounded economically and psychologically, The burning of Washington by the victorious Confederate troops would have been a humiliation from which it would have been hard to recover. The capital would likely have been transferred to New York, only slightly damaged by the war and safer from Confederate attacks in the event of a war. Most likely the North would have continued to lay claim to the South and plotted and dreamed of another war to avenge its national pride and recover its lost territories.

The North's defeat would have plunged the country into a lasting economic depression and stifled the westward expansion of the country. Most likely Utah would never have joined the union but would have remained an independent Mormon nation ruling much of the West, and standing in the way of American western expansion. The tales of the Old West would have been very different.

The Effect of a Southern Victory on World History

In our time line, the victorious United States recovered from the civil war an emerged a world power within a few short years. Rapidly industrializing and blessed with ample space, the United States attracted millions of immigrants from Europe who changed the ethnic makeup of the United States from primarily anglo saxon to a mixture of races and nationalities, all contributing to the American melting pot. If the South had won the war, a deeply damaged North would not have been a beacon for the millions of immigrants who would stream through Ellis Island. The Statue of Liberty would probably never have been erected.

Lacking a safety valve to get rid of its poor, unemployed and unwanted people, revolutions would probably have broken out throughout Europe, but would likely have been suppressed by a congress of European nations acting to maintain the status quo.

Alaska - The Russian Bridgehead into North America.
Alaska - The Russian Bridgehead into North America.

A Russian Alaska

The United States purchased the territory of Alaska from the Russian Empire in 1867 for a mere 7.2 million dollars. The purchase was widely criticized at the time and sarcastically referred to as Seward's Folly, after William H. Stewart, the U.S. Secretary of State who had negotiated the acquisition of Alaska.A defeated United States would have lacked the funds as well as the confidence to expand northward. A victorious Confederacy might have had the money to buy Alaska, but it would have had no desire to do so. Cotton doesn't grow there, and the Confederacy would have had little interest in beaver pelts, then the main export of the territory.
As a result the Russian Empire would have retained its Alaskan possessions. If a Cold War had developed in future between the United States and Russian Empire or the Soviet Union, the two countries would have faced each other across an uneasy frontier in North America.
It is possible that the Russian Empire might have taken advantage of the power vacuum created by a Union defeat to expand its territories in the New World, bringing it into conflict with the British Empire over British Columbia and other parts of Canada.

The Kingdom of Hawaii - Never Annexed by the United States.
The Kingdom of Hawaii - Never Annexed by the United States.

An Independent Hawaii

The legitimate ruler of Hawaii was overthrown and the territory was annexed by the United States in 1898. The seizure of Hawaii was consistent with the American policy of westward expansion across the Pacific, which included the seizure of the Philippines from Spain. A defeated Northern United States would probably have lacked ports and naval bases on the west coast and would have never looked to expand into the distant Pacific. As a result Hawaii would have remained independent or might have been seized by Japan.

In any event the relationship between the United States and Japan would have been very different. Lacking possessions in Hawaii and the Philippines, the United States would not have been in competition with Imperial Japan. As a result there would not have been any war between the two countries. Japan would have had a free hand to expand into China, and China would never have emerged as a world power but would have remained a Japanese fiefdom.

Without American Help The British and French Were Left to Face the German Empire on Their Own
Without American Help The British and French Were Left to Face the German Empire on Their Own

The Arsenal of Democracy

The United States played a critical war in the outcome of both World War 1 and World War 2. The American intervention in World War 1 on the side of France and England helped to end the stalemate that had developed on the western front. In World War 2, American troops were instrumental in D Day and the ultimate defeat of Germany. Even before the United States intervened directly, its Lend Lease program provided the Russians with war materials and helped them withstand the German onslaught.

If the United States had split in two countries, the remnants of the United States would have had little interest in another war and would have stayed out of the conflict unless attacked directly. Most likely neither Germany nor Japan would have gone to war with the United States because an isolationist united states would not have expanded into the Pacific where it conflicted with the Japanese sphere of influence. Without American support in the form of weapons and soldiers, the first world war might have turned into a German victory or a stalemate.

Germany would not have been defeated in WW1 and would not have been subjected to the humiliating terms of the Treaty of Versailles, which contributed to World War 2. If there had been a second world war, Germany would have faced off against England and France, without fear of intervention from the United States. Britain would have been starved into submission by German U Boats and today most of western and Eastern Europe would be a German possession. However it is likely that the Holocaust would not have happened.

The Holocaust was the result of many social and political forces which combined to bring the German Nazi party to power. However the main force which opened the way for the Nazis seizing power was the economic devastation suffered by Germany as a result of its defeat in World War 1. If Germany had not lost the first world war, or if the war had ended with a negotiated peace, much of the anger and resentment which brought Hitler to power would not have existed. As a result the Nazis would not have been able to put their murderous ideology into practice.

Soviet Victory

The Cold War and The Communist Ascendancy

After World War 2, the west faced a new threat in the form of an expansionist Communist Empire led by the Soviet Union. The West led by the United States and Britain faced off against the Russian Bear and conducted proxy wars throughout the world, in Korea, in Vietnam and throughout Africa and Asia. Without American power including its nuclear deterrence, Soviet Russia would have expanded to a far greater extent, and might have even succeeded in spreading Communism throughout most of the world.

More by this Author


Comments 11 comments

Asp52 profile image

Asp52 3 years ago from England

Really enjoyed this hub, the world and it's history would have been very different if the South had won. I think that if the Unionists had lost the Civil War, a European power would have attempted to conquer the fragmented and disjointed states. Do you think that some Southern States would have left the Confederacy and become Nations such as Texas and California?


quotations profile image

quotations 3 years ago from Canada Author

@Asp52 - yes, Texas and California might have tried to become independent. However California at the time had too small of a population to maintain itself. It might have been annexed forcefully by the Mormon nation, who in our time line actually did expand into parts of California, before being annexed by the United States.

The fate of California and the rest of the West would probably depend on whether Texas remained part of the Confederacy or not.

If Texas separated, it would form a barrier against Confederate expansion. Texas would then look to the American interior such as Nevada for areas to expand into.

Another outcome of a Confederate victory is that the Confederates would probably try to annex Mexico completely or expand into Central America, as some had advocated before the War.


NateB11 profile image

NateB11 3 years ago from California, United States of America

This is definitely some major food for thought. It's almost a good argument for war, or, at least, not just letting things be as they are without taking action; not that I think war is good, and I think there's a major problem with countries going to war, especially with the amount of war going on today. But one wonders what this country, and the world, would be like if the South continued on as it was.

I can see the truth of what you're saying here, and the facts are all lined up with it. Interesting stuff, thanks for sharing.


quotations profile image

quotations 3 years ago from Canada Author

Thanks for the feedback. War is evil but often necessary and depending on who wins, it can be the lesser of two evils.


stessily 3 years ago

quotations, Your presentation is interesting. I appreciate your consideration of this question, as it's a question I've pondered from time to time. In a way, though, you could say that the South did win the war on certain planes. As a transplanted Midwesterner/New Englander, I have noted that there are areas of the South where it's as if the war's still going on; they hate "Yankees" on sight and have no intention of changing that attitude. Also, the War Between the States concerned the issue of states' rights, which are asserted, for example, in the different applications of federal programs across the U.S. today.

I've also wondered what would have happened if the North had just allowed the South to secede and form their own country.


quotations profile image

quotations 3 years ago from Canada Author

Good point Stessily. There is no doubt that some aspects of the Old South still endure. But fortunately there has been progress which I don't think would have happened if the South had simply been allowed to secede.


stessily 3 years ago

quotations, As I reside in Virginia, I am aware of many past presences here: George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Robert E. Lee, Stonewall Jackson, etc. I think about Robert E. Lee's "dark night of the soul" in which he paced back and forth, seeking for the right answer: Should he side with the South or the North? Both sides wanted him. His final decision pretty much insured that lines would be drawn for a lengthy war. Because of his decision, part of his state of Virginia broke off to form the state of West Virginia. REL was one of the main jewels in the South's crown. Seceding or not, the South was due for changes, one way or the other: the onslaught of the War defused a major slave rebellion which in and of itself could have brought in the North, presumably on the side of the slaves.

Definitely there has been progress, which becomes even clearer as readers compare your "what if" scenario with 20th-21st century events.


quotations profile image

quotations 3 years ago from Canada Author

Thanks stessily for your comment - Do you think that there would have been a widespread slave rebellion is the was had not happened? I was surprised that the slaves did stage a rebellion in support of the union. Given that most of the Confederate forces were at the front, it would have had a pretty good chance of succeeding, but as far as I know there were no large rebellions and a very small number of slaves even fought in the Confederate army.


stessily 3 years ago

quotations, All my reading, researching, studying, and discussions over the years tell me that a huge slave rebellion was looming; the South was a time bomb. Slaves who fought in the Confederate Army had many motivations, including a way of life via plantations which had some of the charm of medieval fiefs, such as a certain security, especially as relatives (legitimate as well as illegitimate) of plantation owners. The South still is a tight-knit place centered around family, where "We take care of our own" is a golden rule. In slave hierarchy, house slaves tended to fare far better than field slaves.

The Underground Railroad was a huge success. The UR was not just a path to freedom for escaped slaves; it also was an information highway, with messages being carried back and forth. Freedom was in the air. And there is something about freedom that, when glimpsed, felt, or experienced, is virtually impossible to shake off. It would seem that the UR brought a cohesiveness to the slave experience, so that disparate, small rebellions were no longer isolated incidents. One of the attractions of secession to the South was establishing immutable borders and thereby dismantling the UR. An end to the UR could end slave rebellions --- or so some liked to believe.


RonElFran profile image

RonElFran 3 years ago from Mechanicsburg, PA

I agree that a victorious Confederacy would have retained slavery as an institution well into the 20th century. In fact, I think the history of vehement Southern resistance to the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s and beyond shows that a Confederate nation would still maintain slavery today, in fact if not in name. I wonder if there would not be an "Iron Curtain" between the CSA and USA to prevent slaves escaping to freedom. That there might still be a Russian Alaska is really thought provoking. Good hub!


quotations profile image

quotations 3 years ago from Canada Author

Thanks RonElFran -- that's a very good point. I agree that the history of the Southern States into the 20th century and their shameful history of segregation and voter suppression, suggests that the South would have maintained slavery for as long as it could. If the Civil War had not ended it, then only a massive slave rebellion might have brought it down.

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working