jump to last post 1-6 of 6 discussions (20 posts)

The big brain is controlled by the little brain?

  1. ptosis profile image80
    ptosisposted 4 years ago

    No, I'm not talking about the fandangled mandangler. Your stomach has neurons - about the same as a cat's brain!

    So even though it's not able to give "specific and articulable facts" having a gut feeling is real because the blood goes from your stomach to your muscles.

    Here's the BBC story: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-18779997



  2. f_hruz profile image76
    f_hruzposted 4 years ago

    The brain is the basic hardware which also registers all kinds of physical sensations and emotional responses BUT it's your intellect - the software - which everyone can and should develop to the maximum of their mental abilities, in order to function at the most advanced level as an educated, cultural being who understands what their emotions or these gut feelings are telling them to first see where they are actually coming from, and not let themselves be driven by these impulses without first running them through our minds most advanced system of reflection and cognitive analysis, our intellect ...

    1. ptosis profile image80
      ptosisposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      I thought people only use 10% of their brains on average.

      if the software=soul=chemical brain functions (i.e. 'hardware')
      then there is no software.

      1. Cagsil profile image83
        Cagsilposted 4 years ago in reply to this

        That would be incorrect. The left side of the brain handles our logic, reason, sane reasoning and the right side handles all senses(touch, smell, taste, sight and sound) for storage.
        The brain itself is the hardware. The software would be consciousness. smile

        1. ptosis profile image80
          ptosisposted 4 years ago in reply to this

          Define consciousness - as fat as I know there is still not a definition that does not involve a soul.

          1. Cagsil profile image83
            Cagsilposted 4 years ago in reply to this

            Consciousness isn't a soul.

            So what is your point.

            1. ptosis profile image80
              ptosisposted 4 years ago in reply to this

              What is consciousness? I don't believe there is a definition yet other than "subjectivity, awarenes".
              The scientific study of human consciousness is no longer the dualist theory of Descartes, yes?

              1. Cagsil profile image83
                Cagsilposted 4 years ago in reply to this

                I don't know Descartes, so I'm not sure exactly what you're asking.

                I do have an understanding about Duality. I wouldn't know if it matches or is similar to Descartes' understanding. I'm not a student of philosophy and haven't ever been.

                If you're looking for a "soul", then it would be comparative to the human psyche. Otherwise, it doesn't exist.

                The Human Psyche would be the metaphysical explanation, which could be derived as a "soul" or "spirit". Just remember, "soul" and "spirit" are mysticism based ideologies. Both words describe a person's actions.

                Physical and Metaphysical are the duality of humankind.

                1. ptosis profile image80
                  ptosisposted 4 years ago in reply to this

                  Decarte's theory of dualism is that the mind & body are separate which is familiar to most folks. Now, it's no longer thought of a mind/body dualism, the mind/body is to be thought as one. But dualism is so ingrained in our thinking it is a hard habit to break.

                  "no scientific theory for the one thing that we really know very well: our consciousness, our awareness of being us, ourselves."[1]

                  "Epiphenomenalism is the view that one's actions are not caused by one's thoughts: that we are really just passive spectators under the illusion that we control our own behaviour." [2]

                  "We feel our consciousness is located at one point (brain perhaps), but do we know that it is really centralised, and does it need such a locality ? "[3]

                  Is a skin cell on my big toe self-aware about being part of a foot? Are cancer cells 'rebels' that run rampant out-of-control?

                  And this is why I'm into zombies so much:

                  "A philosophical zombie is a molecule by molecule duplicate of a sentient creature, a normal human-being, for example, but who differs from that creature in lacking any phenomenal consciousness. For me, as I lie on the beach, happily drinking some wine and watching the waves, I undergo a variety of visual, olfactory, and gustatory experiences. But my zombie twin experiences nothing at all. He has no phenomenal consciousness. Since my twin is an exact physical duplicate of me, his inner psychological states will be functionally isomorphic with my own (assuming he is located in an identical environment). Whatever physical stimulus is applied, he will process the stimulus in the same way as I do, and produce exactly the same behavioral responses. Indeed, on the assumption that non-phenomenal psychological states are functional states (that is, states definable in terms of their role or function in mediating between stimuli and behavior), my zombie twin has just the same beliefs, thoughts, and desires as I do. He differs from me only with respect to experience." [4]

                  "the term "mental retardation" is not used; as such, Chicago Public Schools uses "cognitive impairment (mild, moderate, severe)"[5]

                  Maybe we are too stupid to ask the right questions, that this life is akin to a butterfly's pupa stage and when we 'die' , heaven is greater self-awareness & true free will?

                  I don't know. Just know that there is no definition for what consciousness is if drop the dualism of "Descartes [who] was merely indicating that the "feeling" of thought is proof that he exists" [6]
                  Can a zombie be self aware? Guided by Parasites: Toxoplasma Modified Humans @ http://tobiastenney.com/2010/06/toxoplasma/


                  Further reading: "Consciousness and Its Implication" by Daniel Robinson

                  1. Cagsil profile image83
                    Cagsilposted 4 years ago in reply to this


                    I'm of the fact that duality exists even on the small unit we can measure in the Universe.

                    Is that smallest unit conscious?

                    Is the Earth conscious?

                    Is the Universe conscious?

                    If all three are conscious on some level whether it's recognized by a "self" type of awareness or not, is something that isn't known at this time. Or can we recognize conscious actions?

                    I'm pretty sure that this discussion will more than likely now move onto you telling me about the brain, how it works and that perception is nothing more than illusion.

                    Secondly, I relate Duality more further than the human body and mind, and even if you wanted to, called it one? Then you still would not be able to eliminate duality, because "Ego vs Conscience" these two are part of duality as I understand it both reside inside one person, which cannot be eliminated. Neither of them can be eliminated, both of them need applied action and understanding, to properly balance them out.

                    I also attach duality to "cause" and "effect" which is something else you cannot presently do away with. It still remains the foundation for our knowledge. If you want to eliminate that, then eliminate all knowledge and dismiss it as if it has no meaning. Good luck with that.

  3. f_hruz profile image76
    f_hruzposted 4 years ago

    Consciousness is nothing more than a higher developed form of awareness  ... a soul is a religious and metaphysical idea which does not exist in the real world!

  4. Cagsil profile image83
    Cagsilposted 4 years ago

    Sorry, but I'm of the understand that any "intuition" or "gut instinct" wouldn't be another brain, but just another function of our subconsciousness attempting to break through to the conscious mind.

    1. f_hruz profile image76
      f_hruzposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      It's interesting to read about some of the misconceptions how to apply ones cognitive capacity to develop an intelligent thought structure where learning how to advance ones intellect becomes the central tool to work with ones mental processes

      1. Cagsil profile image83
        Cagsilposted 4 years ago in reply to this

        Are you talking to me?

        Or are you replying to the thread itself?

        1. f_hruz profile image76
          f_hruzposted 4 years ago in reply to this

          You can take a shot at it either way ... smile

  5. Tusitala Tom profile image88
    Tusitala Tomposted 4 years ago

    My observation has been that we can penetrate our physical body with our concentrated attention.  Not many people realize this.  It does take a sustained concentrative course such as a ten-day Vipassana Meditation course to make one aware of this.  However, once experienced, we begin to realize that we are neither our brains or our bodies and that our 'mind' is extant right throughout our whole physicality.   More than that, it surrounds it.   Exactly where its periphery is a mystery, though I have my personal views on this. 

    It we endevour to find a 'centre' to our being, perhaps within the brain, it cannot be found.  In some ways our body, though it feels very real to us, is a sort of illusion, for the subatomic particles which make it up are arising (seemingly out of nowhere, but obviously from another dimension beyond our ken) and passing away at an incredible speed.  You could say that the man who steps into the shower actually has anoter body when he steps out of it. 

    There appear to be no change, for the patterns which the arising particles take change very, very slowly.  However, they do change.   We age as they do so.

    1. ptosis profile image80
      ptosisposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      wow, thank you. If I could vote this as best answer - I would. 

      BTW I thought it took 6 weeks to completely change our body's cells (on average) Brain=super slow / skin=much faster.

  6. grand old lady profile image89
    grand old ladyposted 4 years ago

    At the risk of sounding like the dumbest contributor to this thread, I would like to note -- now I know why when I watch House on TV, and there is a struggle over a brain problem there is a counterargument over a gut problem.

    For what that's worth...

    1. ptosis profile image80
      ptosisposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      Never watched House - except for the horror movie