jump to last post 1-3 of 3 discussions (13 posts)

How will the definition of family evolve and change in the future?

  1. gmwilliams profile image85
    gmwilliamsposted 3 years ago

    http://s1.hubimg.com/u/8290024.jpg
    Will the definition of family include non-related people who care and respect each other? Will families remain small as the improvements in contraceptive technologies and an increase in social networks is making large families a virtual dinosaur and unnecessary?   What is YOUR opinion on this?
    http://s1.hubimg.com/u/8290036_f248.jpg

  2. 0
    mbuggiehposted 3 years ago

    Social and cultural conceptions of family have changed many times over the centuries. Our current conception, the "nuclear family" (father, mother, and 2-3 biological children) emerged in the 1950s as part of a larger Cold War era civil defense effort to maximize the number of American people who would survive an atomic (read NUCLEAR) bomb attack. Prior to that families were multi-generational groups that included not only parents and children, but what we would today call "extended" family and distant relatives.

    1. 0
      Brenda Durhamposted 3 years ago in reply to this

      Eh....while I see your view.......
      I was a '50's baby,  but preceded by 9 siblings!    And many of our friends' families were that large or larger.   And I'm pretty sure none of us were deliberate results of any plan to populate the world after a nuclear attack!   So unless we were just uniquely fruitful, I think the cold war analogy is off a bit.........


      but yeah I think gmwilliams' questions can be answered with a yes.   
      Sadly.
      And I think he left out the holocaust of abortion that's been diminishing family trees for over 40 years......

    2. gmwilliams profile image85
      gmwilliamsposted 3 years ago in reply to this

      Yes, the family has undergone various evolutions and changes. It was multigeneration blood-related families, then it was strictly one generation nuclear families.  In the future,the definition of family will include both blood-related and non-blood related family members.  The latter applies especially as blood-related families become smaller. 

      As blood-related families become smaller, non-blood related families will become larger.  However, there are STILL THOSE who staunchly insist that the definition of family only includes blood relatives in a nuclear family setting, sometimes not considering extended and/or distant blood-relatives as family. There is a level of clannishness and insularity existing within such people.

      With the increased rise in small families, people are including friends as family. The small family has resulted in more globalization and a universalisitic attitude as far as family.  The strict definition as family to mean only  immediate blood-related immediate family members is becoming outcome, except among a dwindling percentage of the population.   The average person has evolved beyond such narrow definitions of family.

      1. VinitaAmrit profile image85
        VinitaAmritposted 3 years ago in reply to this

        Do you feel that - It is better to have huge families (including both blood-related and non-blood related family members) than an individual nuclear family?

        1. gmwilliams profile image85
          gmwilliamsposted 3 years ago in reply to this

          A resounding no.  A small sized family with blood and non-blood related members is better.  At least, this family unit will be more cohesive and people will ALWAYS  be in contact with each other.

          1. VinitaAmrit profile image85
            VinitaAmritposted 3 years ago in reply to this

            Cheers!

            1. gmwilliams profile image85
              gmwilliamsposted 3 years ago in reply to this

              Right on, quality over quantity.  The more the quantity, the less the quality.

              1. 0
                mbuggiehposted 3 years ago in reply to this

                While I agree that kinship makes a family, I don't agree that the kinship group needs to be very small to be of high-quality...wink

                The large and extended family/kinship group is, as anthropologists have demonstrated, a powerful cultural force.

      2. 0
        mbuggiehposted 3 years ago in reply to this

        Family is the close kinship---in deeply anthropological/sociological definition of the term "kinship", that we make and not that we are necessarily born into. Biology and genetics do not make a family. Kinship does.

        1. gmwilliams profile image85
          gmwilliamsposted 3 years ago in reply to this

          +1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 in agreement.

          1. 0
            mbuggiehposted 3 years ago in reply to this

            smile

  3. gmwilliams profile image85
    gmwilliamsposted 3 years ago

    In the future, the family is definitely going beyond blood boundaries, that's for sure.  Also, the family may evolve from nuclear status to communal status.  People are going to evolve beyond their particular insularity and have a more communal and global approach to the definition of family.  Family is already extending beyond blood ties to include other people into the circle.  Circles of friends are considered family and some are EVEN CLOSER than blood family.
    http://s4.hubimg.com/u/8308643_f248.jpg
    http://s3.hubimg.com/u/8308650.jpg
    For many people, FRIENDS are FAMILY.

 
working