What is a fundamental question? According to the dictionary, 'fundamental' means basic, or essential.
I need to determine the fundamental question involved in an assignment in order to write an argumentative paper. (it involves three separate statements) The only thing I can come up with is: Are these statements right? (which, obviously, they aren't because they all derive from separate belief systems)
So, what are some examples of a Fundamental Question? (I ought to be able to figure it out from examples, lol) Thanks!
what's the topic of your argumentative paper?
Topic - Monetary policy
Questions: Should we have a central bank?
Topic - public schools
Question: Should schools be socialized and paid for my government, or should they be privatized?
Topic - drug usage in the US
Question: Should drugs be legal?
so the fundamental question directly relates to the topic of the paper? I can get that...thanks!
What's the topic you're writing about?
-- ps, there might be more than one "fundamental question". That's the important part.
This is what's known as "framing the debate". If you get to start the debate, you get to ask the fundamental question, and thus frame the debate.
For example, with the topic of "public schools" you could make a million different "fundamental questions".
1) are they working
2) US vs Others
3) private vs. Public
4) the privatization of public schools
5) drugs in public schools
6) students rights IN public schools
7) free speech in public schools.
This is how you frame the debate.
I have 3 'statement' from bin Laden about why the Taliban attacked America. Discuss the DCT and CR - is one statement better than the others and why. (in a nutshell. lol)
so, it sounds like the fundamental question is what I'm responding to, what my thesis statement needs to address. (she said to make the thesis a summary of the problem & the solution) Is it okay to have a thesis more than a sentence? As in, a complete paragraph?
First off, I'm not familiar with "DCT" and "CR"... what do those mean?
A thesis basically means "What are you going to argue For/Agaist".
Topic: Birth Control
Framing Questions: "Should women be allowed to have abortions?"
Thesis: "Women have the right to abortions". (or whatever you WANT to argue).
So, your situation:
Topic: "the 9/11 attacks"
Question: "Why did they attack us"
Thesis: "They attacked us because we've been over there killing their children and women for about a century. It's called blowback."
--- You can probably see a connection between these debates and the HubPages forums. People get onto HubPages, start a forum with a "topic", then the person writes out a summary of the argument (the question), and then everyone on the forum demands their "Thesis" be heard.
Most of the people on HubPages are liberals, so their theses are usually liberal-style "government can help the poor"; a few are conservatives, so their theses are generally "quit hating america and stealing my money!"; and then people like me are libertarian/anarchists whose theses are "let me have my freedom". ----
I think this is what your teacher is asking.
This is for college right? What is the name of the class it's for?
Intro to Philosophy.
Divine Command Theory & Cultural Relativism (DCT, CR)
I do fine when I know what I'm talking about, lol, but when it's taking a step back I'm kinda lost. lol
I have noticed that, with the HP Forums. I've jumped in a few times. lol Guess I should have stuck around a little more. lol
Divine command theory?! Cultural Relativism?!
I don't know much about those things. It sounds like you might not know much either. A quick google search should solve things.
DCT = creationism. Which, at best, can't be proved, and thus is NOT a theory. I know I'm going to piss off a few religious types, but don't get me wrong! A scientific theory is nothing more than "an explanation that has yet to be disproven".
Creationism, "DCT", is NOT a theory because it CAN'T be disproven. No matter HOW much evidence you stack against it, the creationist can simply say "nuh-uh! GOD did it!!!!"
Here's wikipedia on CR:
Your question is to look at What Bin Laden said, and then to analyze it through the lenses of DCT and CR.
Shouldn't be too hard.
"He believes in God (DCT), and thus our infringements into his culture led him to kill people for the greater good (CR)."
Something like that. I dunno.
That is very good. So the existence/non-existence of God could be deemed a scientific theory.
And the fundemental religious question:
Does God exist?
(hope you don't think I was being rude - I just didn't know where to go from his post )
you're right, it COULD be a theory, but now go about gathering evidence for it! (good luck).
The theory of god has not a single shred of evidence supporting it, and thus it is just as plausible as me saying that "invisible, massless chickens do a dance every 10,000 millennia that shape the laws of physics."
Both have equal validity.
Without being Pragmatic, or Religious ... The Fundamental Question, is the Question of "Being" ...
For all Questions emanate from within Being ... the dead and non existent do not pose Questions.
And The Fundamenrtal Questions in Being are the Questions relating The Truth and the Purpose of Being ...
Two things Define the Existential Reality, these are Matter and Idea ...
After you have decided to follow one of the two modes ... of Reason or Belief, the next two Questions are the Defining of Matter and Idea ...
In Islamic Cognition, Matter and Idea Constitute the Reality, in Living Human Awareness ... the Sense of Being ...
Well, these are some of the Fundamental Questions ... hope these are helpful towards writing the referred Paper.
Do I exist?
What is reality?
Does truth exist, or is it merely perspective?
If truth does exist, are there any absolute truths?
Can God, if God as defined by Christianity is an omnipotent being, build a wall God cannot jump?
Do I exist?
One of the ancient Greeks successfully answered this one, but darned if I can remember which one.
By what and whose specifications do you or I exist?
And the most fundamental question of all…
Does Snooki snore?
yes, but the noise comes out from "the other" end....
by Mark Knowles7 years ago
Gardner Osagie vs Mark Knowles (consultations allowed)Osagie proposes:"Biblical theory better describes how human life came to be as opposed to Evolutionary theory." Knowles is prepared to refute this and...
by Peter Freeman6 years ago
I'm not a big fan of getting into controversial discussions in the forums. I prefer to read than write here, but this has been bothering me for a long time. There are some deep questions that I want to ask. When I talk...
by schoolgirlforreal6 years ago
Well,I hear alot of these forums end up in insults etcMy question to you iswhy not move to a communist country? there is no worship allowed there like China- they don't allow the Bible without extreme punishment- at...
by Wendy Iturrizaga6 years ago
Hello, HubMobsters, welcome to a new month and a new exiting HubMob weekly topic. This time after a difficult Diabetes Awareness week we are going to jump to lighter topics and we are going to be writing...
by Rafini6 years ago
I'm a beginning Philosophy student, and the in-class circles of discussion are not helping me to learn what I'm supposed to be learning! Just what am I supposed to be getting out of this class?? lolWe began...
by Chasuk4 years ago
In the future, you take a "time safari" to Jesus' time, you witness his crucifixion, and you are an eyewitness of his decaying, non-resurrected corpse.Would you remain a Christian?
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.