The eye ain't so complex

  1. Evan G Rogers profile image82
    Evan G Rogersposted 5 years ago

    Hey all,

    I know that this forum will quickly degrade into a "Creationist vs. Evolution" debate. All apologies.

    One of the key arguments against evolution -- which is a fact of nature -- is that the eye is so complex that it could never have evolved "by chance".

    But I wanted to show a few videos I've found of Richard Dawkins illustrating how natural selection could easily develop a "complicated" eyeball.

    This one is pretty good to see initially. … re=related

    Followed by a more explanatory: … re=related

    I like how the second video highlights that the eye has actually evolved from "nothing" in at least two different systems.