Where Do Our Human Rights Come From?

During his inaugural address, President Kennedy said, "The rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God."
During his inaugural address, President Kennedy said, "The rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God."

Do our rights come from the Constitution? The Constitution with its Bill of Rights mentions many freedoms like the First Amendment freedoms (religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition) as well as other freedoms that are stated in the form of protections (like no cruel and unusual punishment). But it’s one thing to say that the Constitution mentions such rights; it’s quite another to say that the Constitution is the source of those rights. So, do we get our rights from the Constitution?

The short answer is “yes” and “no.” Some of our rights come from the Constitution while others do not. This essay is devoted to helping you to better make the distinction between the two.

Human Rights Granted by the Constitution

What rights are given to us by the Constitution? It is those rights that define our relationship to the government. Rights such as the right to petition the government, no double jeopardy, and warrants being issued on the basis of “probable cause” come from the Constitution and define how we are related to the government. These rights are a means to an end, that end being greater protection from arbitrary governmental power.

What about the right to vote? It may surprise you to know that the Constitution does not guarantee you a right to vote. What it does say is that right to vote cannot be abridged on the basis of race or former servitude (15th Amendment), gender (19th Amendment), or those eighteen years of age or older (26th Amendment). These amendments do not grant the right to vote. Rather, they assume that the right to vote exits and that that right cannot be taken away under the conditions specified in the amendment.

Human Rights Not Granted by the Constitution

That brings me to the second type of right. Some rights do not emanate from the Constitution. Such rights are outside the orbit of the Constitution and are sometimes referred to as natural rights.

The Constitution does not say that you have a right to practice your religion, speak publicly, own a firearm, or write and publish a book. What it does say is that Congress cannot prohibit or abridge those freedoms. Now, in order for the Constitution to place a prohibition on Congress, we can assume that you are in possession of those rights that Congress cannot obstruct. Historically, our founders have said that such rights are “unalienable” which implies that these rights cannot be taken from the citizen. If they came from the Constitution or from government, they would not be “unalienable.”

But, what is the source of these “unalienable rights”? In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson said that these unalienable rights are “endowed by their Creator.” So these rights do come from authority, but not human authority. They are the bestowments of Divine authority. The role that the government plays with regard to these rights is to “secure” them.
This is one reason why the ACLU’s interpretation of the separation of church and state is a perversion of American ideals. Neither the government nor the people in their collective capacity are the source of our most basic rights. Rather they are the deliverances of our Creator. Consider these quotes which reflect this basic understanding of the source of our rights:

  • The rights of the colonists as Christians...may be best understood by reading and carefully studying the institution of the great Law Giver and Head of the Christian Church, which are to be found clearly written and promulgated in the New Testament. ~ Samuel Adams
  • And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are a Gift of God? ~ Thomas Jefferson
  • Freedom is not a gift bestowed upon us by other men, but a right that belongs to us by the laws of God. ~ Benjamin Franklin
  • Our government rests upon religion. It is from that source that we derive our reverence for truth and justice, for equality and liberty, and for the rights of mankind. Unless the people believe in these principles they cannot believe in our government. ~ Alexander Hamilton
  • Natural liberty is a gift of the beneficent Creator, to the whole human race; and that civil liberty is founded in that; and cannot be wrested from any people, without the most manifest violation of injustice. ~ Calvin Coolidge
  • The rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God. ~ John F. Kennedy
  • History comes and goes, but principles endure and ensure future generations to defend liberty - not a gift of government, but a blessing from our Creator. ~ Ronald Reagan

From these quotes, we can make the reasonable inference that our Constitution is predicated upon a belief in God. As the liberal justice William O. Douglas once remarked “We are a religious people whose institutions presuppose a Supreme Being “ (Zorach v. Clauson [1952]). Atheistic views like those advanced by the ACLU undermine this first principle and would have our freedoms predicated upon the benevolence of the government.

But how do we know that such rights are a grant of the Creator? We can reasonably assume that men and women are granted those rights that make it possible to conduct themselves morally and responsibly. Since the American government came about within the context of Christianity, we can look to the Bible for guidance as to what freedoms would be those that are grounded in a transcendent morality and those that are the whims of people. Finally, it goes without saying that no one has a right to do what is immoral. No one has a right to kill an unborn child or to engage in homosexual behavior.

In short, our most cherished liberties—including the freedom to write and publish this paper—are recognized by the Constitution, but they are not the product of it. Such freedoms are the deliverances of our Creator; a gift from God.

More by this Author


Comments 13 comments

Bibowen profile image

Bibowen 4 years ago Author

The Constitution doesn't address reproductive rights. God gave man the command to multiply and subdue the earth. No government has no voice in this matter.


Paul 4 years ago

so what if the gov. said that a women could only have one baby,would the consitution hold up? Or would the world court rule?


Bibowen profile image

Bibowen 5 years ago Author

Thank you Pintoman and best wishes on hubpages...


Pintoman profile image

Pintoman 5 years ago

Excellent article and I agree, My Esoteric didn't offer any counter quotes that actually countered.

Although Jefferson was a Deist, he considered himself a Christian, just one that saw Christianity in a pure form, though I would say he was indeed a Deist.


My Esoteric profile image

My Esoteric 5 years ago from Keystone Heights, FL

No doubt the battle of quotes could go on forever but I do intend to read more of your hubs for you write very well and understanably. I didn't pursue any further discussion beyond the counter-quotes I offered because I have probably written 10,000 words on the subject so far, only to touch the surface of the real answer, and will be writing 100,000 more, as I am sure you have and will be. Ironically, I started writing hubs to express my religious views, quite different from yours I am sure, and I have yet to get to that as I have been so engrossed in learning and writing about American Constitional and economic history; so much so that I just saw an ad for a Masters in American History and Government that piqued my interest.


Bibowen profile image

Bibowen 5 years ago Author

My Esoteric,

Thank you for your thoughtful comments. I'm surprised that you gave me several quotes of the founding fathers, yet you offered no refutation of the quotes I supplied. They speak for themselves. And I have to say that when it comes to producing the most quotes for my thesis versus against my thesis, I'm going to win that contest.

Second, I have stated in my earlier hub "Tempest in a Treaty" I think the Treaty of Tripoli is probably the best prima facie evidence for the thesis that America is a secular nation, yet the overwhelming evidence leads us to reject such a thesis. I would invite you to read that hub and then we can discuss it.

Third, the freedom of religion and the right to keep and bear arms are a part of the guarantees afforded us under the Constitution and they are certainly compatible with America being a Christian nation. The freedom of religion goes without saying.

As for the right to keep and bear arms, the Bible is replete with men arming to defend what belongs to them and to protect their families. With the exception of a few pacifist groups, Christianity has always been compatible with the idea of waging war and defending one's life, liberty, and property. In fact, the man that put that concept on the map in western civilization was John Locke, a professing Christian who wrote a book defending what he called the "reasonableness of Christianity."


My Esoteric profile image

My Esoteric 5 years ago from Keystone Heights, FL

Good Hub Bibowen but, I would offer these counter-quotes

- “The government of the United States is not in any sense founded upon the Christian religion” - John Adams, POTUS # 2

- The Form of Government, which you admire, when its Principles are pure is admirable, indeed, it is productive of every Thing, which is great and excellent among Men. But its Principles are as easily destroyed, as human Nature is corrupted. Such a Government is only to be supported by pure Religion or Austere Morals. Public Virtue cannot exist in a Nation without private [virtue], and public Virtue is the only Foundation of Republics. There must be a positive Passion for the public good, the public Interest, Honour, Power and Glory, established in the Minds of the People, or there can be no Republican Government, nor any real Liberty: and this public Passion must be Superiour to all private Passions. Men must be ready, they must pride themselves, and be happy to sacrifice their private Pleasures, Passions and Interests, nay, their private Friendships and dearest Connections, when they stand in Competition with the Rights of Society.

John Adams to Mercy Warren - 16 Apr. 1776Warren-Adams Letters 1:222--23

Note - John Adams was probably one of the most devout Christians of our founding fathers

- "No man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burdened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer, on account of his religious opinions or belief; but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of religion, and that the same shall in no wise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil capacities."

From 1779 Virginia Bill of Religious Freedom authored by Thomas Jefferson, POTUS #3

- "Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burned, tortured, fined and imprisoned. What has been the effect of this coercion? To make one half the world fools and the other half hypocrites; to support roguery and error all over the earth... Our sister states of Pennsylvania and New York, however, have long subsisted without any establishment at all. The experiment was new and doubtful when they made it. It has answered beyond conception. They flourish infinitely. Religion is well supported; of various kinds, indeed, but all good enough; all sufficient to preserve peace and order: or if a sect arises, whose tenets would subvert morals, good sense has fair play, and reasons and laughs it out of doors, without suffering the state to be troubled with it. They do not hang more malefactors than we do. They are not more disturbed with religious dissensions. On the contrary, their harmony is unparalleled, and can be ascribed to nothing but their unbounded tolerance, because there is no other circumstance in which they differ from every nation on earth. They have made the happy discovery, that the way to silence religious disputes, is to take no notice of them. Let us too give this experiment fair play, and get rid, while we may, of those tyrannical laws."

From Thomas Jefferson's 1787 Notes on the State of Virginia

Note - Thomas Jefferson was a Deist, not a Christian

Also, the "unalienable" rights referred to in the Declaration tals about the Rights to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness (which mainly delt with enjoyment of property). Nowhere in those Rights do you see anything about firearms and practice your religion; the former of which was created by man for the sole purpose of killing other men with the idea of enslaving the remainder. Religion is also a manmade creation, even though the Creator may not be. The Creator can exist while religion may not by the simple artifact that the Creator never revealed itself to Man. Consequently, neither the right to practice your religion nor bear firearms could be considered "unalienable" within the scope of Life (antithical to firearms), Liberty (which includes speech), and the Pursuit of Happiness.


wba108@yahoo.com profile image

wba108@yahoo.com 5 years ago from upstate, NY

I wish I had said this! You spoke with power, excellent hub!


onegoodwoman profile image

onegoodwoman 6 years ago from A small southern town

It is really simple..........

were we humans before the Constitution or not?

Our USofA Constitution merly PROMISES to uphold our human rights, as given to us by our Creator.


Bibowen profile image

Bibowen 6 years ago Author

Thank you, Ms. Dee. Glad it helped.


Ms Dee profile image

Ms Dee 6 years ago from Texas, USA

Excellent hub on the source of our freedom...our Creator! And the freedom to live out our morality is what our constitution protects. Well explained :)


Bibowen profile image

Bibowen 6 years ago Author

Mytipen,

The point I was making was not on whether you should legislate on morality or not. Rather, I was saying that immoral behaviors should never be protected by law or by a constitution. Another way of saying it is that "there is never a right to do the wrong thing." It's one thing to not legislate morality (as you stated); it's quite another to pass a law to protect a behavior that is immoral. Thanks for stopping by.


mytipen profile image

mytipen 6 years ago from Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A

Yes, our basic freedoms come from God or nature but who are we to legislate on behalf of God or nature, which is what we'll be doing if we make laws targetting morality. We can only make laws to control our relationships with one another and not our relationships with our God. If we can't legislate on things like, say, the air we breath, or the color of our eyes, or the way the sun rises and sets, or when the seasons come and go, I don't believe we should legislate on other people's morals. That should be between such people and their God.

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working