imagine the absence of "self-cure phenomenon" in helminthes parasitism in parasitology.
It is certain that parasitologist know the importance of self-cure phenomenon in parasitism as it seems to be a natural process by which some hosts reduce a parasitic burden. There are various theories of self-cure, which include immunological based theory, and non-immunological based. Anyone interested in the theories can search for it or consult appropriate test books.
My interest here is that as a student of parasitology I had to wonder what would be the fate of the host, in this case ruminant, in the absence of self-cure to parasitic infections like Heamonchus contortus , trichostrongylus axei among other parasites especially those that would be found in cases of mixed infections. Studies by experts in parasitology showed that self-cure can be partial or complete. By partial here, I mean a situation where only the already existing adult worm is eliminated while the larvae, which some authorities believe initiates the self-cure, establishes a new infection. By complete here, I mean a situation where both the larvae and adults are eliminated.
The interesting thing about self-cure is that if an ingested larva or an arrested larva, like some authorities believe, initiates the phenomenon, then it means that the following can be suggested:
1) The host wants to get rid of the parasitic burden or, at least, maintain it at a level that the host can handle via the host’s immune response.
2) The parasite may want to give way and free the predilection site so that a new generation of its kind can establish.
3) Since parasitism is part of nature. That is some organisms were created to be parasites, then self-cure can be a natural means by which nature uses to maintain a balanced host-parasite relationship so that both organisms can continue to co-exist without one overwhelming the other.
It has also been shown that self-cure is not specific as Heamonchus larvae can eliminate Trichostrongylus adult. Therefore, apart from epizootiology, if we can imagine what the situation would be in the absence of self-cure, it is certain that a host will have very little chance of survival and the parasite will most likely be in danger of going to extinct, especially if it is a host specific parasite. I think that is why parasitologist would say “a dead host is not of benefit to a parasite.” That is the interest of the parasite is not to kill the host but to take advantage of the host for its continual survival and self-cure is one of the means to make sure equilibrium is maintained in some host-parasite relationship in the natural struggle for survival by all species.
More by this Author
There are reasons why man may fall short of the glory of God as a result of disobedience. The hub points out ten reasons why man may disobey God either knowingly or unknowingly.
Gynecologist and immunologist have been trying to understand the immunological aspect of pregnancy. This is because of the need of finding a good explanation to why an embryo/fetus, considered an allograft, should...
Work outline Topic I Dedication ...
No comments yet.