Deep Space 9; The Best Trek

To Start

When Deep Space Nine first aired, because it was Star Trek, I gave it a look.
It didn't engage me. I watched it with half an eye for the first season considering
it next to a cartoon, then ceased.

Recently I received a full set of Season 1 - 7.
I began my viewing at Season Four with the arrival of Worf.
I figured Klingons will make it palatable.


I soon became a fanatic.

At the conclusion of the 7th season, I was hyped. It had been the best Trek, possibly the best sci-fi series I had ever seen.

I needed to comprehend how it had slipped beneath my radar when it first aired.


A Quick Skim

Star Trek, TOS...
I watched every episode, I memorised lines. I adored Spock, but trusted Kirk as Captain. I found Bones more than a bit racist, and loved Uhuru. I felt Sulu should have had more to do, but loved the show.

In Reflection...
The sets were cheesy, the cheapness is apparent to older and more jaundiced eyes. Some of the scripts needed serious reworking, more focus, for much of what we find important today was skimmed as if it wasn't.

IN TOTAL

The concepts, the Universe, the character interplay, was like nothing we had known. It was a fantastic idea and sadly, the Producers didn't get it.

Star Trek, The Next Generation

We knew the drill, we were hungry for Trek, and with all the money thrown at it, with the large cast and the interesting connotations, we were far more willing to accept whatever happened.

On Reflection

So much more could have been done, and the almost ambivalent attitude made it so bland. Although certain characters and events might jump out at us, it was not iconic as TOS.

IN TOTAL

They had the money, they had the fans, they had everything, and the show could have been more than it was.

Which brings me to DS9

gaffes

Before I begin a seaon by season review, focusing on the 'shift' from
any episodic television presentation to excellent six hour movies,
a few general detractions.

Firstly, American idioms.

Why do the writers persist in putting American idioms in the mouths of non-Terrans?
If one is not an American, certain of the phrases require a universal translator.

Yes, I know it is an American show made in America staring mostly Americans.
But once one is imagining some kind of humanoid from some other planet, maybe,
just maybe, they could take a listen to a language other than American English.

With squads of writers, why hadn't any of them noticed that the slang used by
many of the characters, (take out the Ferangi) is California circa 1990?

(Take a listen to Firefly if you need an audio aid)

Secondly, it's a bit too easy to change appearances; make Sisko into a Klingon
or Kira into a Cardassian. This ease virtually shouts;

"Don't we got a great make-up team?"

We, sitting home, know that there's a guy named Michael Dorn who has a
forehead not unlike Uncle George's. But we know he's playing a Klingon
who has a forehead like that.

Sure, maybe it was fun for the cast to dress up as Klingons as if they were
going to a Con; but it really cheapens the whole production.

Thirdly, the Holosuites go a little too far.
Let us not forget if they are a room five meters by five meters, although
they might look like the view from the Grand Canyon, if you walk five
meters you hit the wall.

There are a number of other bits and pieces, which totally detract from
the quality, but these gaffes are rather glaring.

The Positives

The term 'story arc' is used by writers to infer that there is an overriding continual story being told. There may be a few side plots, a few one shot characters, but the story is told in consecutive sequences.

In the first few seasons this obvious idea was not so obvious. There were two part or three part episodes but they were 'completed' and followed/proceeded by the 45 minute complete in itself no particular sequence episodes.

If one is flying aimlessly in a space ship unaware of where they are going or what they will meet anything is okay. This week a character can fall hopelessly in love at minute 7 and never see the beloved after minute 42 and thus ends the potpourri of emotions, attitudes, action.

If one is stuck on a space station seeing the same people every time they enter a corridor it doesn't make any sense to have disjointed episodes.

Once the writers figured this out, one could not miss an episode, and they matched so perfectly one to another as if they were shot as one continuous action.

This is where DS-9 excelled and it seems that any subsequent Trek or any sci-fi made after 1999 should hold to this grid.

It is far more engaging. If one cares about a character, it does matter whether or not this happens or that doesn't happen.

Call it a Space Opera if you want, fine, but Soap Operas have loyal followers for
decades not seasons.

And there is a very real market for a weekly Space Opera which is character
centric moral tales. Which is what DS-9 happened to be.

Conclusion

TOS, that is Star Trek, suffered because those who produced it didn't see the potential, the importance. As early as 1970, when it was in syndication, the viewer ship was enormous. This should have activated a few brain cells and had it brought back.

Hire a team of sci-fi writers who were Trekkers (or Trekkies) who could elaborate and connect and recognise the impact.

ST: TNG; that is Star Trek, the Next Generation could have been all that. It had money thrown at it, a virtually captive audience and the reality that people were more interested in the characters than in the whizbang tech.

DS-9; Deep Space 9 realised, by the 3rd season, that a story arc was vital and that the 'one offs' were not what caught the viewers. Yes, there could have been some improvements, but it was certainly the best Trek.

It had interesting characters, plots, tech, and mixed them usefully.

The Next Trek?

What one has to get is that it is the characters who catch the eye, not just the clever plot.
One has to select actors who are in for the long haul, who can bring an excitement to the character. There has to be deep back stories and personalities; this makes the viewer care.

The plots have to make sense, be connected; for this is a weekly show. The characters are
to have memories of past plots, not start walking through a situation saying lines.

What detracts from the new Star Trek universe is the abandonment of 'canon' the make it up as you go along style. Many people have problems with the two new male stars; they don't have that chemistry nor excitement that existed between Kirk and Spock.

One wonders what comes next.

More by this Author


Comments

No comments yet.

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working