Limitless & Sucker Punch: Two reviews

Two films

LIMITLESS: (Two & a half stars out of Five) The premise of director Neil Burger's pseudo-thriller Limitless is reminiscent of the idea behind the book "Flowers for Algernon" (Adapted into film as Charlie, starring Cliff Robertson). That book was the story of a simple man who was turned into a genius by a medical experiment. This film gives us the story of a lazy, irresponsible slacker who is given a pill which allows him to become "a perfect version of himself".

Actually, the film is based on an inaccurate scientific myth. The long accepted fallicy is that we only use between 10-20 percent of our total brain capacity. This is not true. We only use 10-20 percent at any given time, but we do use all of our brain.

Bradley Cooper (The A-Team; the Hangover) plays unmotivated Eddie Morra, who has no job and has been trying to write a book for years but has not written a word yet. He is out of money and his successful girlfriend Lindy (Abbie Cornish) dumps him. The landlord wants the rent. His publishers want to know when he is going to produce that book because they gave him an advance (which Eddie already spent.)

Eddie coincidentally runs into his former brother-in-law who has some special pills that allows Eddie to access his full brain power and have 100% recollection of every fact he's ever heard since he was a child, and the ability to 'file' them in a more accessible way. Eddie loves this new super power, because it allows him to finish his book in hours. He goes back for more pills. When his old brother-in-law is killed by persons unknown, Eddie snatches the whole stash of magic pills, and begins downing them like cough drops.

The new perfect version of Eddie becomes a successful Wall Street investor. He is suddenly popular with people who once shunned him, and he wins Lindy back. His amazing skills also bring him to the attention of a millionaire named (are you ready for this?) Carl Von Loon. (Robert De Niro.) Von Loon recruits Eddie's help for the biggest corporate merger in history. Eddie also becomes a martial arts master due to 'muscle memory' and having watched Bruce Lee movies. (His kung-fu fight scene is taken almost exactly from Old Boy.)

Eddie is in trouble with the loan shark he once borrowed money from, and the guy wants more than cash. He gets a taste of Eddie's pills and now he likes being smart. The small-time thug wants the pills so he can start his own criminal empire. Eddie tries to evade him but the crook is relentless.

Eddie begins to have black-outs and loses time. His brain just can't handle the speed at which it's working and he finds hours of his life missing. He considers quitting but he can't give up the power. Also, he learns that other people who tried to quit the drug have died. So what will Eddie do when he runs out?

The film poses several interesting questions about the nature of the human mind and what constitutes intelligence but it doesn't really answer them. Eddie's improved memory makes him a success but he still makes some stupid mistakes. "You didn't earn these powers" Von Loon tells Eddie, giving a bit of a moral to the story. Eddie never really explores the full extent of his abilities, becoming satisfied with being a Wall Street wizard (a total change from his former artistic slant) and not experimenting with any out-of-the-box thinking. Most of the film plays out like a typical thriller, not utilizing it's premise enough. The film also introduces a subplot about a murder which is soon forgotten and never resolved.

Bradley Cooper is a strange choice to play a super-genius. Certainly he seems like the type to play slacker Eddie but who would have thought he could pull off Perfect Eddie. Surprisingly, he manages to do just that. Cooper may have more potential then he's shown us in the past.

And then we come to De Niro as Von Loon. The once-great De Niro sleepwalks through yet another role. He plays a caricature of Robert De Niro, using the usual De Niro mannerisms, and the patented De Niro sneer. You can't actually say he acts in the film, accept to say that he acts like Robert De Niro. (Oh brother! does anyone remember when De Niro was the mark of quality in films? Is this the same guy from Taxi Driver, Godfather 2, the Deer Hunter and Raging Bull?)

There are some good ideas in here and its a shame that the film focuses on the standard business-as-usual material instead of giving us a look into the mind of someone who truly thinks differently than the rest of the world. This isn't a bad film, just a missed opportunity.

SUCKER PUNCH: (One & a Half stars out of Five)

The strange contradiction in director Zack Snyder's new film Sucker Punch, is that it masquerades as an example of feminist empowerment when, it actuality, it is a geeky adolescent male fantasy about sexy teenage girls in skimpy outfits performing fantastic stunts and doing lots of violence against everything from serpents to samurai.

This is the first film that Snyder (Watchmen, the 300) has made which is not a remake or comic Book adaptation. A self-proclaimed geek, his first attempt at writing an original script has comic book sensibilities, combined with an antic video game style. It looks great but it's a muddled mess of illogic.

The film starts with a girl known as Babydoll (a pouty, purse-lipped Emily Browning) losing her mother and almost being raped by her despicable step-father. When the step dad tries to rape Babydoll's sister, Babydoll fights back with unfortunate results. Dirty dad then has her committed against her will to an institution for girls. To Babydoll's dismay, the nasty owners of the place, (Carla Gugino, Oscar Isaac) have turned it into a brothel where the pretty young girls are forced to dance sexy dances for high-rolling clients (One of whom is played by Jon Hamm.) Babydoll meets four fellow female castoffs, each of which is a walking cliche. Tough girl Rocket (Jena Malone), streetwise Blondie (Vanessa Hudgens), loyal Amber (Jamie Chung) and nice-girl Sweet Pea (Abbie Cornish again). Every time one of the girls starts to dance, Snyder cuts the film to an alternate reality where the girls are warriors.

The otherworldy action sequences are meant to be a vague 'is-it-real-or-isn't-it?' scenario, such as in the wonderful Pan's Labyrinth, which gave us a layer of unreality that underscored and ran parallel to the the more mundane reality of the main plot. It was left to the viewer to decide what the reality was. This film is not done so artfully. Are the girls in Sucker Punchreally being whisked away to perform super-skilled, action missions for a mysterious wise man (Scott Glenn) who tells them that if they succeed in gathering the objects he sends them to collect, they will be free? Or is this all in Babydoll's mind, as a way of dealing with her horrible situation?

The problem with the fantasy world adventures in Sucker Punchis that they do not add to or parallel Babydoll's real situation. They're just a random series of vido-game styled action sequences, set in a bunch of different, bizarre landscapes. All that happens in these weird worlds is a lot of shooting, fighting and various types of mindless violence that seems to have no point. The action is a digression from the "real" world plot, which does not get a lot of screen time, but it should have, since that's where the emotion of the film lies. Sadly, Snyder isn't interested in emotion. He's interested in explosions!

The five teen heroines are meant to be an empowering 'girl-power' gang. However, everything in the film is geared toward young male viewers. The action in this film is not geared toward the Twilight audience. Also, the girls wear revealing little outfits with short skirts (Which are very reminiscent of the uniforms in the popular Sailor Moon anime series, which actually is aimed at young girls), and they perform as young exotic dancers for men. This is a fantasy for teenage boys, not female empowerment for girls.

On the positive side, Zack Snyder is one of the most visually engaging directors out there. The film is full of great FX shots and highly imaginative backgrounds. Snyder has a unique visual style. He's like an action-obsessed version of Terry Gilliam. He's a better action director than he is a writer, because his first script fails to live up to its potential. It never nears the artistry of Pan's Labyrinth or the intellectual puzzles of the mind bending/reality bending Inception. If you shut off the thinking part of your brain and just enjoy the chaos, Sucker Punch might be a fun day at the movies. If you're asking for anything more, then you're going to feel like a sucker!

More by this Author


Comments 10 comments

Paradise7 profile image

Paradise7 5 years ago from Upstate New York

I'd still almost want to see "Limitless". "Sucker Punch" is definitely off the list, even to rent.

Thanks for two good, well-thought-out reivews.


Robwrite profile image

Robwrite 5 years ago from Bay Ridge Brooklyn NY Author

"Limitless" isn't a terrible film. It has its moments. I just felt cheated because it could have done so much more. And DeNiro's continued freefall into self-parody saddens me.

Thanks for reading.


Paradise7 profile image

Paradise7 5 years ago from Upstate New York

You're welcome, Robwrite. I know what you mean about DeNiro. but, y'know, he WAS great! I think the last great one he did was that meet-the-in-laws thing, I forgot the name of it, but he was HILARIOUS!


arak1547 profile image

arak1547 5 years ago from Akron

Thoughtful reviews. I've seen Limitless so far just because my better half didn't want to see the other one. I really liked it and found it very motivational. Just imagine the possibilities! It makes me want to apply myself more and experiment with mind-bending drugs! (Okay, maybe not so much the mind-bending drugs thing) But, I do think the concept is applicable in today's culture of disposable mentality and having cars park themselves because we don't want to deal with it. I think I'd rather use the 20% of my brain (park the car myself) and use it to its fullest extent.


Cogerson profile image

Cogerson 5 years ago from Virginia

Great reviews Rob....I will have to check out Limitless, based on the box office results so far, I think we will be seeing more Bradley Cooper movies where he is the star....I agree 100% about Deniro....in the mid 1980s he was the Spencer Tracy of our times.....the last 25 years I think he has been in one great movie ....GoodFellas...and even then his part is a supporting one......As for Sucker Punch....I will wait for the DVD release...I loved 300 strongly disliked The Watchman....sounds like Sucker Punch is closer to the Watchman....thanks for sharing your reviews


Robwrite profile image

Robwrite 5 years ago from Bay Ridge Brooklyn NY Author

Hi arak,

I saw 'Limitless' as a cautionary fable about performance enhancing drugs, until the end when they tried to make it uplifting. (that's another problem I had with the film. The end didn't fit with the rest of the movie.) The movie wasn't awful, it just fell short of its potential. (Much like the character before the drugs.)

Thanks for reading.

Hi cogerson;

Bradley Cooper seems to be a rising star, and he did carry the film, so I expect to see a lot more of him.

I hate seeing De Niro in his "show me the paycheck" stage of his career, where he'll appear in anything (not act in it. Just appear in it) for the money. Sigh, he was so great once. One of the all-time greats. Sadly, he's not doing his legend any favors with the career path he's chosen in the last 10 or 15 years.

Peace,

Rob


Multiman 5 years ago

Thanks now I dont feel so bad that I didn't see Sucker Punch.


Robwrite profile image

Robwrite 5 years ago from Bay Ridge Brooklyn NY Author

You're not missing anything, multiman.


Cogerson profile image

Cogerson 5 years ago from Virginia

Being a man with 6 kids... whenever I get to the theater it is usually to watch a computer animated movie....so I finally go the chance to see Sucker Punch and thought I would revisit your review. I agree with your review....great visuals during the dance dream sequences...and I really liked Scott Glenn's character.....but other than that...I do not think there was a single character that I cared about....even Babydoll...my son and I have been arguing for days now about how Babydoll's sister died....my son says the stepfather killed her....I think Babydoll fired the gun and accidently killed her via a bullet or the light falling on her head....what do you think? Anyway I have now seen the movie 3 months later and agree with your final line.... Sucker Punch might be a fun day at the movies. If you're asking for anything more, then you're going to feel like a sucker!


Robwrite profile image

Robwrite 5 years ago from Bay Ridge Brooklyn NY Author

Hi Cogerson; I think that Babydoll was actually a killer, either accidentally or on purpose. I think it would make her character more interesting if she was. The twist ending (that I didn't want to give away) doesn't explain things but it does sort of nullify the rest of the film.

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working